Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Goodling Report: How Aides Took Control of DOJ Hiring (Legal Times)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 07:40 PM
Original message
The Goodling Report: How Aides Took Control of DOJ Hiring (Legal Times)
Edited on Tue Aug-05-08 07:41 PM by kpete
The Goodling Report: How Aides Took Control of DOJ Hiring
Joe Palazzolo
Legal Times
August 5, 2008

................

The report places the blame for the political manipulation primarily on two top aides to then-Attorney General Alberto Gonzales: Monica Goodling, the White House liaison, and D. Kyle Sampson, Gonzales' chief of staff. Both have been accused of breaking federal civil service laws and DOJ policy in using politics to vet applicants for career jobs.

But the report does something else. It provides the most detailed account yet of the inner workings of the Justice Department during the period of January 2004 to April 2007, and it shows how the two young aides were assisted in their effort by more senior officials who either actively helped their cause -- or quietly acquiesced.

The effort ranged from placing what they called "good Americans" in everything from temporary Main Justice slots to career judgeships in the federal immigration courts. More than 480 lawyers interviewed for career and political positions were tested with queries like, "Tell us about your political philosophy."

What follows is the story -- based almost entirely on the report -- of how they gained power and how they used it.

POWER GRAB

Monica Goodling knew how to work the system.......


In January 2006, just three months after coming aboard Attorney General Gonzales' staff as counsel, Goodling started rewriting the rules on the way DOJ lawyers were hired.

...............................

oh my more at:
http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202423529642
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 07:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Subversion of justice: the hallmark of a ruthless wholly immoral totalitarian regime
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
belpejic Donating Member (431 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Badling
It's just stunning to me that a novice attorney with practically no experience who graduated from--let's be delicate--a law school not generally known for its excellence could have been making such important and incompetent decisions. I'm tempted to blame the executive branch, but it's really Congress who abdicated all oversight responsibility under the shining umbrella of Chimp love.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. come on -- it took a lot more than quiet acquiescence for green lawyers 3 years out of law school to
come up with this scheme on their own -- not just a few bad aipple / oopples / ayeples
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 10:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Note how blame is given by DoJ to the person with immunity!
While whitewashing Gonzo and not mentioning the White House!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Shumer's boy Mukasey really has turned that ship around--a Judge with integrity
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
4. Why is it, that no matter which GOP scandal is discovered...
...the GOP-controlled media will say the lowest-level employee involved is always ultimately responsible?

Why no one in an executive position is accountable for the department they are supposed to be responsible for?

Excuse my grammar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FKA MNChimpH8R Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-05-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
6. The Puke definition of meritocracy at work
Dullard, ideologically insane young woman with a diploma-mill law degree gets to remake the entire DOJ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-06-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. Thanks for posting this!
I'll have some more reading tonight.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC