|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
ObaMania (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 05:22 PM Original message |
So how would one smack down a jerk who says EXXON paid more taxes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmax (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 05:23 PM Response to Original message |
1. You must be talking to my |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trashcanistanista (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 06:19 PM Response to Reply #1 |
10. Where is this coming from? I heard a similar thing at |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
erpowers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 06:36 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Misrepresentation by NBC's Today Show |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wtmusic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
2. The back of one's hand works pretty well nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 05:29 PM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Failing that, an open palm is pretty effective |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
3. What, $10 Billion in profit isn't enough? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geek_sabre (619 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 08:22 PM Response to Reply #3 |
18. They're also the largest corporation in the history of the world |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NMDemDist2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
4. I'd call that a fair trade for the roads, streets, pipelines etc we provide |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
5. Remind them that Exxon paid more in executive compensation than in drilling for more oil |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ObaMania (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 05:40 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Awesome responses all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 05:40 PM Response to Original message |
8. NO ONE would be in business if they paid more taxes than they profited. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
many a good man (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 06:45 PM Response to Reply #8 |
16. Sure. Businesses are taxed 110% of revenue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
renie408 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 05:49 PM Response to Original message |
9. Since the 11.6 BILLION was a QUARTERLY profit, that would mean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Swamp Rat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
11. Tell him to prove it as well as demonstrate how he and his community specifically benefit from Exxon |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 06:22 PM Response to Original message |
12. Bullshit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dreamer Tatum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 11:57 PM Response to Reply #12 |
25. I'm sure they'd be happy to show you the cancelled check. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-07-08 12:08 AM Response to Reply #25 |
28. They may "pay" it, but do they count how much they get back in subsidies... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dreamer Tatum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-07-08 12:10 AM Response to Reply #28 |
29. See post #27 nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Crabby Appleton (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 06:29 PM Response to Original message |
13. From Exxon's 2008 2nd quarter 10-Q SEC filing, page 20-21 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
librechik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 06:32 PM Response to Original message |
14. MAKE THEM PROVE THAT ASSERTION |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rage for Order (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 08:27 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. Uh, see post # 13, directly above your post n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndependentThinker1 (2 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
17. Sorry, but i think he might have a point :/ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AllieB (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 08:26 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. So you think they pay too much in taxes? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DireStrike (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 09:38 PM Response to Reply #17 |
23. Must be something wrong with that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dreamer Tatum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 11:55 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Good God, is EBITDA really that foreign a term? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-07-08 12:15 AM Response to Reply #17 |
31. "$9.5 billion in sales taxes" and "over $12 billion in what it called 'other taxes.'" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bullwinkle428 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 08:29 PM Response to Original message |
21. Yep - heard the same things from a fundie neocon wingnut on a board |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 08:32 PM Response to Original message |
22. They are lucky that they're not being nationalized right now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Aug-06-08 11:58 PM Response to Original message |
26. What about the subsidies they get? Don't those offset their taxes? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dreamer Tatum (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-07-08 12:02 AM Response to Original message |
27. HERE IS THE APPROPRIATE RESPONSE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Aug-07-08 12:12 AM Response to Reply #27 |
30. Nice use of tax jargon and "dipshit" Well done! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC