Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

John Edwards didn't "cheat."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 03:44 PM
Original message
John Edwards didn't "cheat."
He just had a wide stance on fidelity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jakem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. oh, my...
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. tap, tap, tap...
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. We should have known something was up when he paid $300 for a haircut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. that was after whatsername dumped him.
he need to pamper himself to restore some of his self esteem.

Besides, it was a *$400* haircut.

What in the HELL was he thinking? I'm no moralist. I don't care whether what he did was "wrong" or "right." But I do know it was totally STUPID.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. If that wide stance was indicated in his marriage vows,
which are usually public, and in the understanding of those vows, and the terms of "fidelity," between he and his wife, that would be correct.

Do you think that's the case?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I don't have the slightest idea.
Regardless of what his marriage vows stated, short of declaring an open marriage, his affair would constitute a "wide stance," que no?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Not unless his wife was in the loop. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
6. ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-08-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. why in the world would anyone lock this thread?
It breaks no DU rule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC