Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"No Take-Home Swag: Stripping Bush and Cheney of Retirement Perks!" --Huff Post

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-08 09:11 AM
Original message
"No Take-Home Swag: Stripping Bush and Cheney of Retirement Perks!" --Huff Post
(It might be the only thing we have left that we can do since Impeachment/Investigation is "Off the Table." :shrug:

--------------------

No Take-Home Swag: Stripping Bush and Cheney of Retirement Perks
by Jackson Williams

Last summer, a USA Today-Gallup poll found 36% of Americans thought Congress should impeach George W. Bush. Even more wanted Dick Cheney's head. Despite fluctuating numbers for several years, no serious movement to forcibly remove them from office ever caught fire. The simple fact is that this administration effectively ran out the clock on impeachment at least a year ago. That option is long gone.

Yet the shoes just keep on dropping!

Ron Suskind's new book The Way Of The World shows conclusively that the White House ordered a fake, backdated letter to "prove" that Saddam Hussein had WMD and was connected to al Qaeda. First we're lied into war, then false evidence is contrived to fool us, and Suskind's proof comes from no less than former high-ranking CIA officials who are named and on tape. This news is simultaneously beyond the pale and not shocking at all, which is the odd place we find ourselves after seven and a half years.


Richard Nixon's paranoia led him to spy on his enemies and he ultimately resigned, the only president in history to do so. Only a pardon by his vice-presidential successor averted criminal indictment. The Bush/Cheney duo, however, is a completely different animal, making "Tricky Dick" come off as a mere piker.

Therefore, something must be done, but what? Filing charges after Bush leaves office is possible but problematic because the Constitution lacks any guidance. The Supreme Court, which forced W on us in the first place, ruled in 1982 that ex-presidents do have "damages immunity" for official, on-the-job acts. As for lying, Bush never testified under oath about anything, not even when he was interviewed by federal prosecutors investigating the leak of a covert CIA officer's name.

More importantly, mounting a criminal case could take years. It would freeze the country in the partisanship of the past when an Obama administration wants to move briskly into the future. We may be better off with Crawford, Texas in our rear-view mirror.

Still, there's a hell of a mess left behind, so here's a workable solution: no swag bag on their way out the door.

No post-presidential emolument of any kind. No lifetime salary (currently $200K annually), no multi-million dollar office budget to ante up every year, nothing to help build the Bush presidential library. Not a dime of taxpayer money, period, other than the necessary security detail.

This crowd is super wealthy; they won't end up on desolation row. But such a response will shout for the record -- officially and forever -- that in this country you can't walk away unscathed after such high office malfeasance.

After all, Nixon suffered greatly for his deeds in office. Bill Clinton endured impeachment over a non-criminal dalliance with an intern. Are Bush and Cheney destined to suffer zero indignity? Whistling arm-in-arm into the night as the camera fades, like the final scene from Casablanca? It sure seems that way, unless we insist on some sort of justice.

Congress sets salaries and retirement benefits. There were no presidential pensions until 1958, so they're hardly sacred. Nothing precludes withholding them as punishment, either, so any piece of legislation aimed at the current occupant would doubtless be constitutional. There's no precedent for it, but there's certainly precedent for considering it. There was chatter when Nixon left office in shame, and congressional Republicans floated the idea in the late 90's against Clinton.

Let's strip Bush and Cheney of our hard-earned tax dollars, without gloat or bloodlust, then quickly move on.

It's the least we can do. They've more than earned it.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jackson-williams/no-take-home-swag-strippi_b_118314.html?view=print
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-08 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Just let Dubya take the much-ballyhooed rug that Laura "designed"
out of the Oval Office. We'll never hear the end of it if he doesn't. He's going to want it for his heroic library's heroic facsimile of his heroic Oval Office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-08 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They need to be held accountable in some way...this might be all we have
left that we can do. But, it would be important to still have that option...even if it seems small.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-12-08 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
3. One piece of 'swag' they can have is an orange jumpsuit. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC