Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

President Bush on balancing the budget

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 01:18 PM
Original message
President Bush on balancing the budget
THEN: "Many of you have talked about the need to pay down our national debt. I listened, and I agree. (Applause.) We owe it to our children and grandchildren to act now, and I hope you will join me to pay down $2 trillion in debt during the next 10 years. (Applause.) At the end of those 10 years, we will have paid down all the debt that is available to retire. (Applause.) That is more debt, repaid more quickly than has ever been repaid by any nation at any time in history." (Applause.) 27 Feb 2001

NOW: "First, we must balance the federal budget. (Applause.) We can do so without raising taxes. (Applause.) What we need to do is impose spending discipline in Washington, D.C. We set a goal of cutting the deficit in half by 2009, and met that goal three years ahead of schedule. (Applause.) Now let us take the next step. In the coming weeks, I will submit a budget that eliminates the federal deficit within the next five years." 23 Jan 2007

Even though this new plan is much less ambitious, even its easier goal is sacrificed to continued tax cuts:

"In committing his Administration to a balanced budget by 2012, the President seems to be acknowledging that deficits matter. This is progress. But there are reasons to believe that the President's newfound interest in fiscal discipline is more cosmetic than real.

First, his budget is likely to achieve balance in 2012 only on paper — by leaving out key costs such as the cost of continuing relief from the Alternative Minimum Tax and by assuming unrealistically deep and unspecified cuts in domestic discretionary programs in years after 2008.

Second, and more important, the true test of the President's commitment to fiscal responsibility is whether he is willing to put all parts of the budget on the table — including both popular programs and taxes — to meet the nation's serious long-term budget challenges. Yet the President continues to insist that Congress permanently extend all of his tax cuts, which will cost about $300 billion a year and provide an average tax break of more than $150,000 a year to people with incomes of over $1 million."

http://www.cbpp.org/1-23-07bud-stmt.htm

I guess the M$M could report that the President is full of sh*t, but that wouldn't be "news" would it?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. I like the part about paying down $2 trillion in 10 years.
Out of $87 trillion, that is mere pittance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. you must be including social security obligations in that
of the 5.6 trillion dollars of Federal debt in 2001 only 3.17 trillion was held by the public. 2.45 trillion was in various trust funds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC