Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Army Official Who Revealed Deplorable Conditions At Veterans Treatment Facility Is Forced To Resign

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 09:49 AM
Original message
Army Official Who Revealed Deplorable Conditions At Veterans Treatment Facility Is Forced To Resign
http://thinkprogress.org/2008/08/20/fort-sill-firing/

Army Official Who Revealed Deplorable Conditions At Veterans Treatment Facility Is Forced To Resign»


On Monday, the USA Today reported that barracks for wounded soldiers returning from Iraq and Afghanistan at the Army’s Fort Sill are infested with mold. In addition, soldiers living in the units said that “their complaints about mold and other problems” have been ignored for months and that they were told to keep quiet about the problems:

Twenty soldiers, who spoke to USA Today early last week, said their complaints about mold and other problems went unheeded for months. They also said they had been ordered not speak about the conditions at Fort Sill.

The base commander, Maj. Gen. Peter Vangjel, said in response to inquiries about the ongoing problems, “We’re going in and we’re going to take care of this for these guys.” In a later Associated Press report, Vangjel acknowledged that soldiers who knew about the mold were ordered to “remain silent,” but added that suggestions that the complaints were ignored are “simply not true.”

But now the Army appears to have retaliated against the Army social services official, Chuck Roeder, who first reported the poor conditions at Fort Sill — and their neglect — to the media. USA Today reports that Roeder has been forced out of his job:

An Army social services coordinator…who told USA Today about poor conditions at Fort Sill’s unit for wounded soldiers has been forced out of his job, the employee and base officials said Tuesday.

Soldiers meeting with Army Secretary Pete Geren…on Tuesday said Chuck Roeder, 54, was a strong advocate for their problems and should not have been forced to leave. <…>

Roeder, a retired soldier, said he was told to resign or he would be fired.

An executive officer at Fort Sill said Roeder’s departure is “purely coincidental.”

The episode at Fort Sill is reminiscent of the handling of the deplorable conditions at Walter Reed uncovered by the Washington Post last year. In the aftermath of the Post’s report, CQ Today revealed that Walter Reed’s problems were long-known to officials in the Army and Congress, the Army accused the media of propagating “misinformation,” and the Pentagon tried to quiet criticisms by blocking the congressional testimony of the former Walter Reed Chief.

Noting that Fort Sill is the second Army installation in recent months to have such problems with barracks for returning soldiers, VetVoice writes, “this is pathetic.”

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Purely coincidental my ass.
Good gracious, can't they use that massive budget to keep the soldiers safe and healthy once they're home convalescing?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Frustratedlady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. It's always refreshing to see articles witnessing how this administration
supports the troops! Yes, Sir! Bush shows us how it's done! Yes, Sir!

Besides, those returning soldiers are damaged goods. No good to this administration from here on out. Move on. Nothing to see here!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southern_belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
3. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
4. there is the Mukasey version of accountability PLUS there's this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
6. How utterly non-surprising.
I try hard not to hate anyone, but these fuckers make it hard not to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. It's like the Soviet Union where you could lose your high ranking job for delivering bad news.
You wouldn't want to deliver the kind of news that angers Stalin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. Why am I not surprised in the least??
Chickenshit scumbags....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadrasT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. Once again
the bastards are lying to us, they know that we know they are lying to us... and they just don't give a rat's butt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC