Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Bush Covered up Musharraf Ties with Qaeda, Khan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 04:05 PM
Original message
Bush Covered up Musharraf Ties with Qaeda, Khan
http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp?idnews=43605

Analysis by Gareth Porter*

WASHINGTON, Aug 19 (IPS) - Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf's resignation Monday brings to an end an extraordinarily close relationship between Musharraf and the George W. Bush administration, in which Musharraf was lavished with political and economic benefits from the United States despite policies that were in sharp conflict with U.S. security interests.

It is well known that Bush repeatedly praised Musharraf as the most loyal ally of the United States against terrorism, even though the Pakistani military was deeply compromised by its relationship with the Taliban and Pakistani Islamic militants.

What has not been reported is that the Bush administration covered up the Musharraf regime's involvement in the activities of the A. Q. Khan nuclear technology export programme and its deals with al Qaeda's Pakistani tribal allies.

The problem faced by the Bush administration when it came into office was that the Pakistani military, over which Musharraf presided, was the real terrorist nexus with the Taliban and al Qaeda. As Bruce Riedel, National Security Council (NSC) senior director for South Asia in the Bill Clinton administration, who stayed on the NSC staff under the Bush administration, observed in an interview with this writer last September, al Qaeda "was a creation of the jihadist culture of the Pakistani army".

If there was a state sponsor of al Qaeda, Riedel said, it was the Pakistani military, acting through its Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) Directorate.

Vice President Dick Cheney and the neoconservative-dominated Bush Pentagon were aware of the intimate relationship between Musharraf's regime and both the Taliban and al Qaeda. But al Qaeda was not a high priority for the Bush administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. another link
http://smirkingchimp.com/news/16565

<snip>

After 9/11, the White House created the political myth that Musharraf, faced with a clear choice, had "joined the free world in fighting the terrorists". But as Asia expert Selig S. Harrison has pointed out, on Sep. 19, 2001, just six days after he had supposedly agreed to U.S. demands for cooperation against the Taliban regime and al Qaeda, Musharraf gave a televised speech in Urdu in which he declared, "We are trying our best to come out of this critical situation without any damage to Afghanistan and the Taliban."

*****

In July 2007, a National Intelligence Estimate concluded that al Qaeda's new "safe haven" was in Pakistan's tribal areas and that the terrorist organisation had reconstituted its "homeland attack capability" there. That estimate ended the fiction that the Musharraf regime was firmly committed to combating al Qaeda in Pakistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
2. Musharraf and AQ Khan have been working with BFEE since the 80s. Of course, Bush and
Cheney knew. So does Bill Clinton. That's why BCCI's outstanding matters were deep-sixed throughout the 90s, leading directly to Bush2, 9-11, and this Iraq war. The fascist agenda is on the express track now and has been for the last 8yrs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluesmail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. This is important and crucial information.
BLM's right. They're all connected. (Triangulated). Lots of triangulation. Wish I had something new to post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. And why posts like this get so few eyeballs. Too many Dems are good at CLAIMING they're engaged
Edited on Thu Aug-21-08 09:10 AM by blm
truthseekers concerned about their nation's fragile democracy, but when the rubber hits the road with the REAL threats highlighted, they are nowhere to be seen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
5. "al Qaeda was not a high priority for the Bush administration."
Gee, ya think??!

Preventing the 911 attacks was not a high priority for the Bush administration.

Rebuilding New Orleans (or any other American city, town, street, bridge...)is not a high priority for the Bush administration.

Dead uniformed soldiers is not a high priority for the Bush administration.

True support for our uniformed Americans, such as clean hospitals, proper body armor and equipment, food, water, shelter, is not a high priority for the Bush administration.

Americans are not a high priority for the Bush administration.








Power, money...and oil. There's the bUsh regime's trifecta.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I don't think the world community is NOT a hugh priority for the Bush regime
either, unless they can profit off someone's else's land and resources and do not care how many people they kill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-21-08 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. Is there any doubt it's going to be a lavish retirement? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC