Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rawstory has story Iran Attack Planned For Last 6 yrs --- LINK

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 02:21 PM
Original message
Rawstory has story Iran Attack Planned For Last 6 yrs --- LINK
http://www.rawstory.com/news/2007/Iran_The_Road_to_Confrontation_0123.html

After reading this story, there should be no doubt that they are getting ready 'to do Iran.'

The Larry Franklin passing of classified information to AIPAC officials, Michael Ledeen's role, and the creation of an Iranian Directorate at the Pentagon, all add up as this well written article sets out.

We will be lucky if we are still commiserating over Iraq next year this time, and not heavily involved in an armed conflict with Iran and Syria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Brilliant republican plan
How do we take people's minds off our fuckup in Iraq? Bomb Iran of course. And the right wing hate machine will crank up loud and clear, the cheerleading led by those who have never done anything in service to our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. 'bout as brilliant as pukes get. Dee dee dee.
Edited on Thu Jan-25-07 02:26 PM by lonestarnot
war for war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Does it say what they plan to use instead of soldiers?
Since they don't have any?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yes, Bush himself said so...
"Human-animal hybrids" :rofl:

I laugh to hide my sadness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Not Just a Last Resort, by WashPost's Wm. Arkin
CONPLAN 8022-02 is the operative plan

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/14/AR2005051400071_pf.html

Nukes, not 'human-animal hybrids'. BTW, this is anything but funnybusiness.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I think he's trying to make himself impeachment-proof
Impeaching a president while a hot shooting war is on?

He'll send 21,500 more troops to Iraq as soon as the Democrats take power just to make the Democrats look impotent, set the stage for the next two years and the 2008 elections.

And now, with impeachment winds turning from a breeze into a gale, he'll start a war with Iran just to keep himself in office.

<sigh> I watched "Clear and Present Danger" a couple of weeks ago. Twice (it was on Showtime). We need a Jack Ryan to save us from that evil president and his evil aids and advisors.

The part where the President confronts Ryan and tells him that the public won't accept another conspiracy that goes all the way to the top, that they won't believe it, and that Ryan should just take his chit and go home, just seems so appropriate now.

Well, at least I'm out of the blast range of a nuclear attack on Minneapolis, St. Paul, or the Mall of America, and I'm shielded from radiation by hills.

Fuck, this sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. The ABM will knock the warhead off course
and land in someone's back yard. Hey Mabel, I think it's coming this way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. Indeed, this is not a laughing matter because these people are so incompetent...
and delusional they may very well do this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. Hey, they crossed a man with an ape and got George.
Think of the possibilities.

What has gotten into me today. Oh, right, my pc is giving me grief and I'm full of bitterness and hate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Nukes. Investigate CONPLAN 8022 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Atlantic Monthly's "Will Iran Be Next ?" already wargamed it and it was a failure
Will Iran Be Next?
Soldiers, spies, and diplomats conduct a classic Pentagon war game—with sobering results

by James Fallows
http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200412/fallows

It doesn't get much clearer than this. They already knew Iraq would be a fiasco, according to A World Transformed by Daddy Bush and Brent Scowcroft:

http://www.snopes.com/politics/quotes/gulfwar.asp

and the Powell Doctrine was totally ignored:

Powell Doctrine, short version--

"Essentially, the Doctrine expresses that military action should be used only as a last resort and only if there is a clear risk to national security by the intended target; the force, when used, should be overwhelming and disproportionate to the force used by the enemy; there must be strong support for the campaign by the general public; and there must be a clear exit strategy from the conflict in which the military is engaged."
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/extra/teachers/lessonplans/iraq/powelldoctrine_short.html

Congress' failure was allowing the AUMF resolution language with '...as he (Bush) determines...' language. This was unconstitutional and also a violation of the War Powers Resolution which required 'clear' (read truthful) 'situations' and 'circumstances' be presented to Congress before troops would be put into harm's way.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
9.  A Joint Operation With Israel is Most Likely....
THis is being watched very carefully because we sold the Israelis 'bunkerbusting' bombs about a year ago. The Israelis are famous for taking US weapons systems and modifying them. (They used to buy our fighters, strip them of the protective skin to make them fly faster).

There is no doubt that if the US attacked Iran, one guaranteed response would be a retaliatory attack on Israel. So you have to guess that Israel will be in on the front end since the US will not be able to protect them after the deed is done. Besides, many reports say Israel is the force behind the attack pushing the US.

Congress needs to get to the bottom of this and fast. Bush is saying one thing and doing another, just like he always has done since taking office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftchick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. there is an awful ot of Democratic support
for whatever the hell Israel wants to do rather than what is in the US interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
14. Divine Strake related DU posting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PATRICK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
15. It is worse than this post hints
Edited on Fri Jan-26-07 08:40 AM by PATRICK
All this evidence is not new.

The march to the inevitable war is highly visible over "there" and and has been talked about over here for all these years without penetrating the fantastic lull that presumes there is some procedure, some "if", some drama, that must unfold before we even get worried about it. Desultory debate on the practicality of the criminal madness mostly seeps in at the corners even on DU. War protests still mean the last war against the entr'acte while the band plays on. The first crime, as per usual Rovish impunity, serves as a distraction away from its primary role as beachhead.

The Israelis fill their media with it. Inevitable. Soon. So too the Iranians and everyone else in that region. But our media spotlight our national consciousness is not so focused and thus not so aroused. No drama in the UN. No big MSM drumroll or collusion. Why bother? The phony war, like pre-blitz Paris or pre-shock-and-awe Baghdad, finds Americans picking away at untouched and obstinate nutball chickenhawk commanders over other things. Cronies and MSM have fled the scene. The dull show, barely interested in concealing itself even in the transparent fraud of last time, goes through the motions.

To some, this quiet signals the collapse of the war plan, so many heads replaced with smaller ones, so much intensity focused on reinforcements to Iraq. But the incompetent Chickenhawk in Chief and his Grey Eminence Chickenhawk still have the simple capability of ordering the pieces into action.

And they will. The Libby lawsuit. The debacles in Congress. The turning of the people. The disastrous consequences of the war. Reason itself(to idiots and the desperate what does THAT mean?), Nothing deters until some physical removal or draining of that capacity goes on.

All that Will Pitt said seems correct until one notices the war against Iran is unchecked and nothing yet has physically happened to change one single thing on the ground in the ME. If it all collapses suddenly, few in America will appreciate how close we were at this moment, how inevitable an AVOIDABLE slaughter was. If it doesn't none will know how everyone seemed to know this except the news starved parochial American public- made into and treated like the morons that the elite actually are.

All our arguments against the war and its results are the very reasons that keep Bush going. This is the typical reverse, criminal thinking of many RW perps since this nation began. can we please put them where they belong BEFORE more needless victims? Can we win one simple "NO" before they pull the trigger with our hijacked nation? Can we deny the lust of the A-bomb bullies and bury them along with the warheads in the dustbins of madness?

Bush can't go it alone with the decimated cronies he has if Cheney and his pirate crew vanish from the scene. The rapid appointment of Petraeus has done nothing except help and give the impression that control over the next war is completely unchallenged. The ships must be drawn back. There is NO immediate and conceivable threat that they need to address, no diplomatic effort or pressure they are sincerely part of. it is only for immediate war and everyone in the ME knows it. Pressure must be brought to bear somehow on Israel to withdraw from their grand collusion with the "plan". The MSM should be slapped along side its collective small head with a vengeance to wake them up. The same work done for minimum wage and the "splurge" has to immediately focus on the war work in progress.

Right now it is even a sorrier charade than last time, the nation drugged, in a mist of lies and distractions and the most incapacitating powerlessness regarding the future falling fast upon us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:53 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC