Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Family is filing water drinking contest civil suit. Read it here:

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 03:51 PM
Original message
Family is filing water drinking contest civil suit. Read it here:
I still feel the radio station deserves everything that comes it way!

( link to lawsuit is posted to the right of the story)

http://www.kcra.com/news/10842107/detail.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. in this case, I think the radio station should get sued and then
settle out of court for a big settlement rather than embarrass themselves.

When you own a company you must learn to CYA.

1. Their attorneys should be consulted about all their stupid contests just to cover any dangers.
2. Things they aren't aware of being dangerous should be investigated.
For instance googling the statement "Can drinking too much water be dangerous" will get you a whole lot of links that tell you that yes...it is.


In this case they failed miserably to cover their ass and now a person is dead.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
galadrium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
2. How is the radio station at fault?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. They knew this could result in death and it did.
They had received a warning from a nurse that this could result in death. They also cited a case where it result in death. The DJ's did not protect her from death. Instead they only relied upon their own protection in teh liability waiver. That will be quickly tossed. FRankly they should be charged with manslaughter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. How about for continually telling the woman to continue despite medical
experts calling the station and explaining the risks?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jilln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Then presumably the woman heard those warnings too.
Not saying the station doesn't have some fault here, but pretty much anything we do can result in death. The woman could have stopped drinking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ET Awful Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #15
21. How do you know she heard the warnings?
She wasn't necessarily listening to the radio station the entire time, she was to check in periodically via phone, etc. with the station.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jilln Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. I said "presumably"
Maybe she didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Well, if they offered a game of Russian Roulette with a loaded gun would they be
liable if someone died? How about a contest to see who can push someone off a twenty story building? Seems to me if an individual did this it would be considered murder or at least accessory to murder, why should a corporation or radio station be exempt?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. with Russian Roulette you have a chance...
this lady was doomed from the minute she started drinking with a will to win...

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. Huh.
So she was the only one participating in the contest?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-26-07 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #20
22. no...but once she decided she was going to drink
Edited on Fri Jan-26-07 08:26 AM by ProdigalJunkMail
whatever it took to win...she was doomed. It seems the other players had the sense to get out before the electrolyte balance in their systems reached the critical point (not that you would easily know that)...but she kept going.

And I know the comparisson is flawed, but with Russian Roulette you DO have a chance that the chamber will never come up with the bullet. Here, you drink for long enough, you are going to die.

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. If you heard the tape of the contest you would know why
A nurse called in saying what they were doing was dangerous. The DJs laughed at her.

The decedent was complaining of a headache (that was the first sign her brain was swelling). The DJ said (to the effect of) "Your body is 98% water. If you have too much you'll just throw it up." Well, that is completely untrue on a number of levels.

Generally I do agree if one does something dangerous one is solely responsible for hurting yourself. However, they lied about the danger, encouraged her to participate and discouraged her from getting help. They did this to make money - sell advertising. If you hurt someone while trying to make money then you are liable for the damages you cause.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleedingheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I had not heard the part about the nurse calling in to warn them
that adds reckless endangerment to this and someone could sit in prison too...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tandot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
12. The DJ knew she could die and was totally fine with it:
Edited on Thu Jan-25-07 04:18 PM by tandot
http://www.kcra.com/news/10775448/detail.html

<snip>

The audio clips include a warning from a listener that the contest was dangerous.

Listener: "I want to say that those people drinking all that water can get sick and die from water intoxication."

DJ: "Yeah, we're aware of that."

DJ: "Yeah, they signed releases so, we're not responsible, it's OK. (laughter) If they get to the point where they have to throw up, then they're going to throw up and then they're out of the contest before they die, so that's good, right?"

<snip>

----------------

I say sue the hell out of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wizard777 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's manslaughter as far as I'm concerned. n't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
9. I saw where they want to close the station down
I feel bad for the people who had nothing to do with it and are going to lose their jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrangeCountyDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. She Didn't Win The Contest?
I think they should offer the family a Wii, and see if that makes up for the loss. It's the least they could do.

:-)

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. No, she took second
2 tix to the Justin Timberlake concert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OrangeCountyDemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. My Guess
I'm guessing that this has cost the station a whole lot more than a crate full of Wii's, and a stack of free J.T. tickets.

Hope they got their money's worth, because they're about to face some significant legal expenses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. If this happened on a college campus as a fraternity hazing ritual
not only the fraternity but the college might be sued because they allowed it to happen at a chartered fraternity. That's why colleges have anti-hazing rules.

No reason this radio station shouldn't get the book thrown at it. It's sad for the innocent people who will lose their jobs, but they will have to find others. I think this whole operation is going down. And the DJ who was stupid enough to assume that people always throw up water before they die of ingesting too much of it should never work in the business again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Youu are 100% correct
That radio station will be out of business shortly. They are going to pay big time and someone may be heading for prison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. Actually it did happen in a frat hazing here in NorCal & the DJ's referenced that on air, jokingly.
It was a widely publicized case. Matthew Carrington was a 21 yr old who died in 2005 of water intoxication resulting from a frat hazing ritual. There were criminal convictions, including involuntary manslaughter. The family also sued the fraternity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
19. It was clearly negligent
though I'm not sure whether the attorneys will get punitive damages for an intentional tort.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC