Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House blames mortgage bailout on Congress

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 02:36 PM
Original message
White House blames mortgage bailout on Congress
White House blames mortgage bailout on Congress
By Sam Youngman
Posted: 09/08/08 03:09 PM


The White House on Monday said the multibillion-dollar bailout of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could have been avoided if Congress had acted years ago when President Bush expressed concern about the way the two companies were set up.

The federal government seized control of the two companies over the weekend as a stopgap measure that could cost taxpayers as much as $200 billion.

White House press secretary Dana Perino said Monday that Bush has long warned Congress about the failure to act on the lending giants, and the federal government regrettably had to step in to “prevent further deterioration from affecting the broader economy, especially the availability of credit for home mortgages, consumer credit and business lending.”

“This is not a step that the administration was anxious to take,” Perino said. “And in fact, it is exactly the kind of event we've warned about and tried to prevent over the years. Remember that we have highlighted the systemic risk posed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac because of the very large role they play in housing markets, and because of their business practices.

more...

http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/white-house-blames-mortgage-bailout-on-congress-2008-09-08.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. Years ago? When Repukes controlled Congress?
lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
2. uh...uh
wow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. Iirc, there is a grain of truth to this. He didn't like the set up.
But the Republicans wouldn't cooperate and it wasn't a priority for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. he as in smirk-boy didn't like the set up - or cheney didn't like it? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. The Torture President, Smirk. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. Let's see proof of Bush expressing concern years ago

And wouldn't that be when the Repugs controlled both houses of Congress?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. Did anybody ask Perino for precise dates that Bush 'warned' about this. Seems to me the problem
developed as a direct result of 'de-regulation' and the belief that capitalism is best when free of government oversight. Both the doctrines of St. Ronnie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. So what did the Decider actually, you know, do about it?
One statement issued in a Friday news dump hardly qualifies as a warning. And since Bush didn't send anyone over to Capitol Hill to talk to his good pals Denny and Billy about scheduling legislation to address the burgeoning mortgage crisis, it's a pretty empty warning, at that. And didn't Bush extol the virtues of home ownership in his State of the Whatever speech more than once, and crow about his administration's record in minting new homeowners?

He prolly had his fingers crossed when he said it, though, so it shouldn't count against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
9. Nothing to do with Republican deregulation
Remember when they took a chainsaw to banking regs? How did that work out for us?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alsame Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. I think this whole mess is Bill Clinton's fault. In fact, I am
absolutely sure of it. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC