Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(LHC) Cosmic rays from deep space strike the earth every day (LHC)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 08:12 AM
Original message
(LHC) Cosmic rays from deep space strike the earth every day (LHC)
Edited on Wed Sep-10-08 08:45 AM by sudopod
with energies energies hundreds of millions of times greater than anything the LHC could ever dream of.

For example, protons can be accelerated up to 7x10^12 eV in the LHC.

Cosmic rays can have energies on the order of 10^20 eV.

*Sigh*

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_Rays
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LHC
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. but they don't go bananas underground, do they?
and who really knows what could happen with this experiment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 08:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Do you really think it matters that it's underground?
Really?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. I don't know, sudopod. Do you? Really?
You come off as arrogant re this issue, and need to remember that we all have our areas of interest and advanced study. Physics is not my forte. This experiment is disconcerting to me, and to many others. Even the NAtional Geographic states "It sounds scary, and it is", and that "One minor calamity has already happened: A magnet all but jumped out of its skin during a test in March 2007. Since then 24 magnets have been retrofitted to fix a design flaw. The people running the LHC aren't in a rush to talk about all the things that can go wrong, perhaps because the public has a way of worrying..."

Yeah, call me silly, but this experiment scares me, as the atomic and nuclear experiments scared people in the 1950s. Whether those were a smart idea or necessary is highly debatable. I feel the same way about this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Get. A. Grip. (shakes shoulders, slaps face).
don't feed into the climate of ignorance.

this is same type of argument that was used before the first test of the hydrogen bomb. Will it burn up all of the atmosphere? Will we all die in a flash?

guess what, we are still here. Have some faith for crying out loud.

:banghead:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. You say National Geographic is feeding into the climate of ignorance?
Oh, and Pardon me for not having unwavering faith in the experiments and games of men -er, mankind. Go slap your own face, genius.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. not going to get into a flame war with you. That's why there is blocking!
I don't associate with willfully ignorant people.

oh and your no doubt witty retort will go unread by me so your level of satisfaction will be blunted.

good day, you are now blocked.

boob.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. scary, dude
you start the flaming and insulting, and give inappropriate and irrelevant responses to reasonable comments. Glad to know you will not be bothering me anymore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #8
15. How much do you know?
Edited on Wed Sep-10-08 11:37 AM by sudopod
Before we get into a discussion about general relativity and quantum mechanics, how much do you know about the "threat?" I don't want to tell you things you already know.

Specifically, do you understand the basis behind the creation of black holes and strange matter?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. I am sure you know far more than I do about quantum mechanics, et al
I wrote before, this realm is not my forte. As far as getting into a discussion with you about this, I am afraid it would be one-sided. I know it is true that one fears that which they do not understand. Spending some time educating myself about this would undoubtedly help assuage those fears, and make me a better conversationalist on the topic, but I am not inclined to spend time on that in the next few days. What I do know from personal experience and observation is that experiments are by nature fraught with unknowns, not all problems can be fully or accurately anticipated, men can make mistakes, and bad things can happen. My instinct (or ignorance) tells me that there is potential for catastrophe with an experiment like this one. If that isnt the case then why, as the Nat'l Geographic article stated, are those involved with this project reluctant to talk about the things that could go wrong?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 12:23 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Because they aren't really "experts"
NG's fact checkers let everyone down on this one. It aggravates me that a publication as prestegious as National Geographic didn't do a simple google search to make sure the people they were interviewing were the least bit credible. The original article is here: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/09/080909-black-hole_2.html . I mean, "dark matter factory?" Srsly? They betray a fundamental lack of understanding of the terms they are throwing around. My guess is that this is at some sort of desperate cry for attention that the media picked up on account of its sensation value.

The two people mentioned in the article are:

Walter L. Wagner - http://www.coasttocoastam.com/guests/1515.html

A lawyer who claims to be a physicst, but whose only professional training is a physics minor to go along with his biology BS.

Luis Sancho is apparently a random internet kook. His website is here: http://www.unificationtheory.com/astrophysics/starandgalaxy.htm

The Bad Astronomer (Dr. Phil Plait) has a great synopsis of what went wrong here:

http://74.125.45.104/search?q=cache:3frbsSFdHBEJ:blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/03/29/no-the-lhc-wont-destroy-the-earth/+http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2008/03/29/no-the-lhc-wont-destroy-the-earth/&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us

Sorry for the long link, the blog entry seems to be returning a 500 error, but the article is still in the google cache.

I hope this has been helpful!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 12:51 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. thank you
It is surprising & disappointing that NG would mislead the public with this article. i am bookmarking your post and will check out the links. Thanks again for your thoughtful and informative response.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. I'm assuming incompetence, not malice; even NG screws up sometimes (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. No prob! ;) nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #8
24. You're Silly
Your underlying argument here is "I don't understand it so I'm afraid of it."

High school physical science class is about all the understanding of physics you need to know why this is not an issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. It's underground for a reason...
so those same cosmic rays don't disrupt any experiments :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
20. That's what I'm saying....
I don't like it. It's a risk, and no one knows what will happen, despite their confidence that it is safe. I know it's been done before, but on a much smaller scale. I am watching this closely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. No one knows that the ham sandwich in your lunchbox isn't made of antimatter.
Edited on Wed Sep-10-08 12:25 PM by sudopod
It may have not exploded yet due to the fact that your lack of recent observation has prevented its waveform from collapsing.

If you value the your life and that of the whole world, please don't open it and see.

It's better to be safe than sorry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. This is just a classic example of people
who can't take things at face value. It is what it is. I am not in any way religious, so don't even try to suggest that's my motivation either. It's just this fascination with why things are, and are not, that I don't have. I don't care. I don't need to know how mass, or matter got here. It just IS.

Regareless of what they find, or not find, it will never have ANY effect on me, in my lifetime, and possible never have any effect on anyone else, unless they are wrong about the safe factor, and they have spent 9 BILLION dollars to apease scientist looking for the higgs boson....


There are a LOT of scientist who object to this, so don't even pretend that everyone is OK with this.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. It's Thanks to Attitudes Like This
That some people still believe the earth is 6,000 years old.

And the science produced by paricle colliders has already had practical applications in many areas, including nuclear medicine. I think science that teaches us better ways to heal people is pretty important, don't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. I don't believe the earth is 6000 years old...
but I also don't believe that spending 9 BILLION dollars for this experiment is right. Hell, we can't even spend a DIME to find a way to stop the perils that face people on this planet, such as hurricanes, and tornados. Seems to me, if they can do this, they could surely put the heads of those 7000 scientist together and come up with something to extinguish both hurricanes, and tornados before they strike. But they don't want to do that....god forbid they actually do something that changes lives for the better, right here, right now. The US spent 535 MILLION dollars on this, as an observer. WTF? Do we really have that much cash to just throw around? I think not.

But you seem to have all of the answers, so apparently, no one elses opinion matters.

:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. So you're okay with spending money to do scientific research
on tornadoes and hurricanes but because you fail to understand the practical application of things like the LHC you don't want money spent on that?

Ehhhh, ok....

I don't have all the answers but I have a 9th grade understanding of physics and have done a moderate amount of reading on the LHC and understand why it's an important bit of research.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #23
30. Irony
Edited on Wed Sep-10-08 01:45 PM by sudopod
Typing up a forum post on a computer whose CPU is made up of transistors -- a fundamental electrical component governed by quantum mechanical phenomena that were unknown a century ago, but were discovered via physics -- using the world wide web, which is an invention of scientists at CERN, the European Center for Nuclear Research. LOL

TL;DR -- "I'm incurious and I get angry when people don't like it." -- You

Sound like anyone we know?

Also, I'm sure you can find self-proclaimed "scientists" who will say anything. There are plenty that deny global climate change, but guess what, that doesn't make them any less wrong. :p
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. No science allowed
I am hoping for the black hole ... no need to pay my Visa bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 09:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. LOL yes, if I turns out to be a black hole, that's fine too. I call it the grand reset. LOL nt
Edited on Wed Sep-10-08 09:34 AM by Javaman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mainegreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. Now wouldn't it be bitching if we could harness that in some useful way?
Like a cosmic ray lens allowing the astronauts to BBQ in space!

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. Ok then why haven't I got superpowers?
I can be super annoying, but that's it.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 08:30 AM
Response to Original message
6. bamp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
7. Thank you.
I keep thinking that all of the trepidation is just sarcasm, but then I realize that some are actually frightened by all this. I just don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
16. Clarification:
The thing is that nature's own bounty of super-fast nucleons don't collide with other things in places chock full of epic XBOX HUEG detectors, whereas the ones in the LHC will. We can only learn from them if we see what happens with ridiculious levels of detail.

^_^
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobalt1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
17. If anyone understands the least bit of physics, they laugh at the hysteria.
Edited on Wed Sep-10-08 12:10 PM by cobalt1999
If anyone is worried, they should endeavor to go out an learn a little bit of physics.

The fact that people are taking this thing as a serious threat shows how little science is being taught in our school systems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sudopod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. Preach it, brother.
Edited on Wed Sep-10-08 11:57 AM by sudopod
Also, informative link: http://www.badastronomy.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC