Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RAW STORY HAS IT! WHAT MCSAME COVERED UP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:26 AM
Original message
RAW STORY HAS IT! WHAT MCSAME COVERED UP
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Whistleblower_breaks_15year_silence_to_allege_0911.html

Whistleblower breaks 15-year silence to allege McCain hid wife's drug abuseNick Juliano
Published: Thursday September 11, 2008


Cindy McCain's addiction to prescription painkillers emerged into public view 14 years ago with a well-orchestrated PR campaign designed to preserve her husband's political future.

Aside from a lengthy contemporary investigation from Phoenix's alternative weekly and occasional mentions since then, the addiction back-story -- including ample questions about what John McCain knew, when he knew it and questions over whether he was complicit in the cover-up -- has gone largely untold. Until now.

Tom Gosinski, a former employee of the medical-aid charity Cindy McCain used as personal supplier of Percocet and Vicodin, is speaking out publicly for the first time.

On Wednesday, Gosinski sat down with RAW STORY and other outlets to tell his story and distribute copies of his personal journal from his time with the American Voluntary Medical Team in the last half of 1992, where he voiced ever more acute concerns and frustrations over McCain's drug use and its impact on her mood and job performance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
YEM Donating Member (553 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. 5 hours ago called
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
114. The good news is ...
Obama is still facing a demented old geezer and a hockey mom. Let's face it, do we really want that to change?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
2. ehh n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPNotForMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sigh.
I hope this is the last time this is posted. No one cared the first 5 times this morning.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
353. Raw Story always seems to "have the story"
as soon as someone there reads it in the NYT or the WaPo :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. Ok fine. But how are you sure it will go further?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
32. Guess we have to wait for it. A video link was pulled last night from WaPo.
I suspect tomorrow. And I suspect that information not @ raw, but just a guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:39 AM
Original message
I hope you are correct.
The mainstream news media whether print or broadcast has been a cowardly exercise in the last several years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #32
315. Actually, would 'the People' want a drug addict First Lady?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Highway61 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:33 AM
Response to Reply #315
384. They have an alcoholic President now
Remember...everyone would like to have a beer with good ole George
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
84. who's sure of anything?
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #84
89. My point would be I'm sure of nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #89
103. Sometimes you just have to act
without surety. Action puts possibilities in motion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
186. Sounds like Three Days of the Condor..."How do you know they'll print it?" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #186
191. Only interesting if part of an overall narrative about abuse of power. Not sure how
much if that is out there for McCain, but can be talked about in context of "two Americas" where the rich skate and the poor serve time.

Or maybe better is to use the opportunity to talk about "more of the same"...abuse of power by GOP and Bush has been RAMPANT AND OBVIOUS over the last eight years. We can tie McCain to that again.

Or we can talk about Palin abuse of power and talk about the ticket being above the law...trooper gate, son avoiding jail by going to Iraq, firing Librarian, etc.

But this topic needs help from the left and from the press...it won't get legs on its own even though it should.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #191
310. If McCain's campaign manager wants to claim the election
is about the personalities, then this wrecks his argument.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. Okay, now you can go away for a month.
You wasted our time hyping a bullshit nothing of a decade-old story based on the word of a disgruntled former employee who was involved in litigation with the McCains.

EPIC FAIL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #5
24. Employees become disgruntled for a reason
The details of this will show up the McCants for the hypocrites they are.

Grampy's tendency to cover up embarassments of his own once again he has bad judgment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:39 AM
Original message
You can go away for a month for being so mean
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 10:39 AM by merh
there you go - how's it feel - to you the story isn't important but it may be to others. You can ignore it - use hide a thread.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fluffdaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #5
213. Unbelievable. And to think I woke up looking for this......... BIG STORY
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Th1onein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 07:58 PM
Response to Reply #5
299. There is no sense in being rude to Lonestarnot.
Asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tektonik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #299
356. neither was there a need to spam the forum with bullshit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Th1onein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #356
377. I've read all of her posts and she did NOT spam the forum.
You know, I'm getting sick of DUers treating each other like shit. Why are we so hard on each other? We're supposed to be the good guys.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tektonik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #377
382. Yeah she didn't spam, that's why her threads were locked
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Th1onein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #382
385. Same old people.....
Same old people, same old game. Trolling the board, looking to start shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
6. that was posted early this morning in gdp. Is this it, really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geek tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. We got punk'd. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. i'm glad i didn't get excited over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #12
22. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
leeroysphitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #22
101. Oh My! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #12
105. No kidding.
I've seen this movie before. Sure, if it were Obama covering up Michelle's addiction it would be non-stop coverage on every network and the election would be over. But this is a total non-starter since it involves a Repub.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. it appears so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #6
40. There may be may more! You just have to wait.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #40
98. I'm ready.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eowyn_of_rohan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #40
99. you strongly implied it had to do with the Keating 5
???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #40
140. There's more nothing where
that nothing came from!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 04:23 PM
Response to Reply #40
258. I don't think your credibility is strong right now
Really? Wait? Again?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #258
266. Wolf! Wolf! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:58 AM
Response to Reply #40
358. Is there more?
Unless you are certain that WaPo has proof of obstruction of justice this story will go no where.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #40
364. There has to be more or this story wont pop
its old news unless theres more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueInPhilly Donating Member (341 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
7. I am underwhelmed N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
8. OMG!!! Cindy was addicted to painkillers 15 years ago??? That's HUGH!!!!
...and, being her husband, he helped keep it quiet.

Gee, I don't know how the Republican Party will ever recover from this.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sasha031 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
11. it's an old story
can it get any legs, will people care?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #11
107. They would if it involved the Obamas. The CorpRAT media would make sure of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
13. aaaahhhh
Nothing here, We now embrace unwed teenage mothers and drug addicts. Thought everybody knew the new family values.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
14. Sorry, a 15 year old story pushed by a disgruntled ex-employee want' change anything
and won't bear mentioning on the teevee at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crabby Appleton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #14
235. Correct. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
15. You must have a really low threshold for giddiness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
161. She once found sprinkles in her ice cream.
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 12:09 PM by Codeine
Nearly had a coronary from HAPPY GIDDY DANCING! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
16. Epic Fail
Honestly, this little drama should end with a little forced time out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #16
81. I agree. Lonestarnot, you may be well meaning but this is nutting.
Take a break until you get your perspective back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fluffdaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
210. I agree with you. A little forced time out is in order.
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 01:46 PM by Fluffdaddy
Ok maybe not. But damn this is lame
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
17. yeah, ok...
this is going to get buried, swept under the rug, spun away

by tomorrow mccain will be on top of his WHAAAAAAAAambulance and whining about it...

the only way a "scandal" will hurt mccain, is if he's caught ON TAPE in bed with Palin and an underage male hooker - even then it's ify
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
18. What guy wouldn't try cover this up for his wife?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
19. thank you, lonestarnot. now tell us what the cold pickles meant. :)
i don't think most here know how damaging this is to McCain.
It's a witness and a Diary!

and this story will not go away if the net keeps up the talk about it - msm will have to cover it.

woot! thankyou!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #19
51. The MSM may have to cover it, but it's not a deal breaker for McCain
by any means.

There is nothing new about this story except the charges that McCain knew and covered it up. A lot of people, not even politicians, react that way when a family member is an addict.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #51
59. he was protecting his career, not his wife. the piece of shit.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zazen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #51
116. didn't he also use political position for personal vendetta against whistleblower?
that's a little more than "keeping the family secret."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #116
194. Yes that is the real story. McCain used his poltical position to
get his wife off the hook, to destroy a man's career in the desire keep his own political career intact and without taint. The truth can be hidden with money and political power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WheelWalker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #51
131. If he obstructed justice by interfering with the DEA or state inter-agency narcotics
teams; and/or if he was actually complicit in enabling or facilitating criminal activity by use of his office and position, that will be new news that can't be ignored. I just say there had better be evidence, and admissible evidence at that. I'm withholding judgment till I hear the reset of the story come out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #19
52. Delete - dupe
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 10:41 AM by gateley


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
20. Yes, and...
...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
21. Tell us about the story speculating that McCain has Alzheimer's.
Now that is a story!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #21
129. Another poster named Lucky13 claimed that they called THEIR media sources..
yesterday and both confirmed that there was an "Alzheimers" story in the works. Who knows if it's true, or if we're being Rathered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cottonseed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #129
239. This is what I was expecting.
So, I'd say there's 2 crappy stories out their now. I mean C'mon, I heard a lot of, "it's about McCain and drugs". Give me a break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tallison Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #239
295. I heard McCain and Aricept
Someone's gotta check the guy's prescription records.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
23. What is this supposed to do to the McCain
campaign? Her drug use is already known. She looked high at the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #23
44. Try this article, question: Did McCain tamper with DEA to protect his career?
http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=8147
There are lots of unanswered questions, but the basic contours of the story are clear. John McCain used his position as a Senator to help his wife abuse illegal drugs and avoid being searched by customs, and somehow his wife managed to avoid any charges by the DEA or the state (which has mandatory minimums in cases like this) on drug charges despite ample evidence. Did the DEA or the state not file charges against her because of political pressure? Did they keep this on the Federal level to avoid mandatory minimums for Cindy McCain because of political pressure from McCain? Did John McCain and/or his Senate staff tamper with a criminal investigation of his wife and her conspiracy to fraudulently obtain illegal drugs?

Whether illegal or not, and an investigation by Congress should happen, this is clearly a massive and overreaching case of both corruption on a personal sordid level and an abuse of power. And you might be seeing Gosinski on mainstream media soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mountainvue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #44
78. Thank you. Let's see how interesting and ugly
this story will get. After the last eight years, it's hard to have faith.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 01:02 AM
Response to Reply #44
359. Of course he did
But if there was any actual proof someone would have used it against him a long time ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
25. Gimme a break. Sorry, but this ain't gonna make a damn bit of difference.
People don't give a shit about a 15 yr old story.

Hell, they don't care about what happened LAST WEEK.

The 24/7 news cycle makes this incredibly OLD news and hardly worth anything.

Sad, but true. Sigh. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:32 AM
Original message
I buzzed it up - considering it a public service announcement for the younger voters. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
26. Ha! Where are all the giddy Happy Feet People
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 10:47 AM by ResetButton
who told me to STFU?:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #26
91. Shades of Al Capone's vault. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #91
94. Heh, yep. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
independentpiney Donating Member (966 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #91
134. Exactly! great analogy nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MzNov Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #26
224. Still right here. We don't bail out on our fellow DU'ers

the story isn't what I expected, but unlike you I wouldn't think of trashing another well-meaning Democrat.

Thanks lonestarnot. :hi:

Have a happy feet action anyway.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coventina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
27. ARE YOU KIDDING ME?!?!?!?
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 10:36 AM by Coventina
THIS is the "big deal?"

I am completely disgusted.

For this we were supposed to sign up for breaking news with the Washington Post?

You should really be ashamed of yourself.

You know, MOST VOTERS are going to at least partially empathize with McCain on this issue.

As another poster put it EPIC FAIL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eShirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
28. dupe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
29. K&R
This thread is a great weeding tool.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #29
34. You fucking bet. I see them!
:donut: :smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #34
95. Think about all the people the war on drugs ruined over the same
type of "CRIMES". Think of how much political mileage people like McCain have gotten from bragging about fighting America's "DRUG PROBLEM". Think about how McCain may have abused his power to protect a member of his own family from being held accountable for the very same "Crimes that he was bragging about and campaigning on, having helped put other people in jail for years for.

The president of the United states should be a man of strong character who is trustworthy, honest and honorable. Anything less sets a bad example in the eyes of the country and the entire planet.

"Happened a long time ago" So did Whitewater, but the GOP never quit raising hell about it.

A pattern of GOP abuse of power RE: the "war on drugs?" Here is just one example:

Ashcroft's nephew got probation after major pot bust

Although his arrest for growing 60 plants could have landed him in federal prison, Alex Ashcroft was tried in state court and avoided jail -- despite his uncle's crusade for tougher federal drug laws and mandatory prison sentences...MORE

http://archive.salon.com/politics/feature/2001/01/12/ashcroft_nephew/print.html

And then there's Rush...


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #29
145. Weeding what?
People with the ability the recognize bullshit when it's served to them as dinner?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #29
179. Ooooo, I loves me a good which hunt!
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 12:38 PM by NeedleCast
Great weeding tool to find people who understand the current political climate and why this will get zero traction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
akwapez Donating Member (342 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
30. Seriously? No offense, but this is the big story??? C'mon. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
31. I really did think the super hype would lead to a bigger deal than this one.
We all knew about Cindy's problem and knew her husband hushed things up.

Let's hope the Raw Story coverage gets it more broadly distributed.

But pushing a story like you did was really so very peculiar. Almost as though it was designed to discourage us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #31
41. Please don't do that again. Thanks n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nine Donating Member (472 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #31
54. I posted something similar
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=7026102&mesg_id=7027277

Maybe this will get some traction in the MSM, but the hype has practically guaranteed that it won't get any traction on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
33. lonestar NOT indeed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #33
43. That animaiton
kinda makes this whole charade a little bit worthwhile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fla nocount Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #33
65. That second post needs a spike on top. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #33
68. OH OWWW
That clip in your sigline is zOMG fucking brutal x(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #68
74. not a sig pic
it's just posted specially for this and another thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #74
100. Ok well whatever it is.. It's still brutal
:yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
35. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Really? FUCKING REALLY?!?!

All this hype and this is what you have? A captain obvious story about something that happened 15 years ago?

FFS...

I hope all the people you duped are felling stupid right now. They should be.

*PLUNK*

This is going to register about a .1 on the give-a-shit meter for the general public.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
36. Well, thanks -- but personally I think this is pretty disappointing. No smoking gun.
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 10:36 AM by gateley
Stories with lines like

" like the time Cindy was allegedly taken to the hospital "

aren't going to stop the presses.

He will be painted as a disgruntled employee, the same as he was portrayed before. Sigh.

Hopes dashed again. :(


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mike Daniels Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #36
80. The main source has as much credibility as Larry Sinclair
IOW...zip, nada, zero

Anything teased as much as this story was is obviously going to be BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 01:07 AM
Response to Reply #80
361. That's is unfair
The individual in this case maintained documents and was a witness to the events. He had every reason to be disgruntled and upset at what she did to the charity and it's workers. Stop trying to smear his character. This story is a non-issue since there never was and never will be proof of McCain's cover-up; but attacking the guy who fought Cindy for destroying the Charity is BS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imalittleteapot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
37. zzzzzzzzzz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pale Blue Dot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
38. Hyperbole is the BEST THING EVER!!!!
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 10:36 AM by Finnfan
An overwhelming "thank you" for bringing this epic story to our attention. I'm sure it will change mankind in profound ways for centuries to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #38
42. Carl Sagan just crawled out of his grave to factor this into his Cosmos series
and re-shoot them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
39. GD-P link with a bit more/different stuff on it. Did McCain Tamper w/DEA to protect his career?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #39
46. Thanks uppityperson! That is what I've been looking for!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #46
109. Lonestarnot, if the DUers don't think it's a story ...
it ain't gonna fly. This is arguably the most sympathetic audience on the net and if we can't get excited about the story it's old news. I understand you didn't have the details and were relying on someone's opinion you respect, but next time you might want to temper your enthusiasm. BTW, I hope you're right about this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krawhitham Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #109
250. DUers are fucking crazy
everything is a trap
fight back
NO DON'T fight back
Attack Palin
Don't attack Palin
Talk about the issues
Palin is the issue

More DUers think the Alzheimer story has more legs than this story where McSame tampered with the DEA to cover his ass

DUers are fucking crazy

one poll comes out and 50% think we are doomed, 20% think it is a RW trap, 15% thing we should fight back harder while another 15% think fighting back is what caused the dip in the poll

DUers are fucking crazy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #46
199. Thanks lonestar for directing us to this story. This new info let
lose by the whistle blower will be hitting the internet media of not the national media. This just goes to show that we are right about John McCain, that he is just as conniving as any other overly ambitious pol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #39
56. And this is why we will be hearing more!
"... this is clearly a massive and overreaching case of both corruption on a personal sordid level and an abuse of power. And you might be seeing Gosinski on mainstream media soon."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
independentpiney Donating Member (966 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #39
58. If any DEA come forward to back this up you have a story
Otherwise it's just the same old story that's told by the same old ex-employee everytime McCain comes up for re-election. Nobody fucking cares. If it can't even stay on the top of DU with constant re-posts, how is it possibly going to create some outrage in the general electorate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #39
64. This part of the story is more interesting, has shades of TROOPERGATE.
The abuse of power angle is the meaty one. Where the McSame's seem to have gone after Gosinski in a retaliatory manner.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #64
69. Absolutely!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #64
205. Sad to see so many disallusioned and jaded DUr's taking
this newer revelation with a grain of salt. Some of us had not known such detail of Cindy McCain's drug use and nothing of a coverup by her errant husband. Perhaps some of McCains supporters will have their eyes opened and have reservations about helping to put a conniving power player in the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #205
255. I had read that McCain tried to cover it up and the obstruction of justice was
a more important issue than her addiction.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie2 Donating Member (53 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 02:14 AM
Response to Reply #205
369. Common Knowledge -
At least I thought it was common knowledge. It seems to me I knew Cindy McCain was an admitted, recovered, prescription drug addict 15 years ago or so. I can't tell you where I first heard it, but I believe it was on tv (and I don't get cable, so it would have been broadcast tv). Anyway it isn't news. She isn't the candidate, and (apparently) she is off the drugs for some time now, so I don't know that this story is anything more than of the human interest variety.

Betty Ford had a drinking problem, did she not? How about any other first ladies? I'm not sure the husbands were judged about it one way or the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
45. Okay, so this doesn't exactly *help* McCain
The buildup was a bit much. I'll wait and see what else comes out of it. Thanks, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LondonReign2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
47. Jesus H Christ on a trailer hitch
THAT story got you excited?

Is that you Bev?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #47
106. You called?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #106
180. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyLover Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
48. That's it? WTF?
This has been known for ages. The average American doesn't give a hoot about things that happened 3 days ago, let alone 15 years. Moreover, as far as the average American sees it, Cindy paid her dues, her husband supported her and did what he did out of love and this guy is a disgruntled employee with an ax to grind against a POW and his wife who is both a recovering drug addict and stroke survivor. All in all, this does nothing to even any playing field.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #48
252. don't forget about her sprained wrist and pink arm cast
the poor poor thing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dems_rightnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
49. Oh man, this sucks
That's all? For 80 threads in caps?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tazkcmo Donating Member (668 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
50. Super Old n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
53. Is the implication that Cindy is still using?
Otherwise, the fact that she was addicted 15 years ago isn't exactly earth shattering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #53
62. But wouldn't you say that if john used his power and influence
that THAT is the real story here? Not necessarily Cindy's drug use.
John McCain another bully.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #62
208. It isn't obvious to some here that McCain has used underhanded
and perhaps illegal tactics to cover up this whole affair for the sake of his piddling political career. Have we become such a cynical nation that the truth has to be hidden for fear it won't be taken seriously?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #53
67. No, the implication is Mccain tampered with the DEA about it.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=7027477&mesg_id=7027477

http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=8147
Did McCain Tamper with the Drug Enforcement Agency to Protect His Career?

There are lots of unanswered questions, but the basic contours of the story are clear. John McCain used his position as a Senator to help his wife abuse illegal drugs and avoid being searched by customs, and somehow his wife managed to avoid any charges by the DEA or the state (which has mandatory minimums in cases like this) on drug charges despite ample evidence. Did the DEA or the state not file charges against her because of political pressure? Did they keep this on the Federal level to avoid mandatory minimums for Cindy McCain because of political pressure from McCain? Did John McCain and/or his Senate staff tamper with a criminal investigation of his wife and her conspiracy to fraudulently obtain illegal drugs?

Whether illegal or not, and an investigation by Congress should happen, this is clearly a massive and overreaching case of both corruption on a personal sordid level and an abuse of power. And you might be seeing Gosinski on mainstream media soon.

We need an investigation into what happened here. What did McCain know about the investigation of his wife and did he use his power as a Senator to help her abuse drugs or avoid prosecution? When he was one of a hundred Senators, it was of minor importance. And now? Well it would be nice to know if the next President is engaged in behavior more characteristic of an influence peddling mob boss than an upright politician.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #67
71. And there you have it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fluffdaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #71
206. That's the BIG STORY....Lame..Lame lame lame lame..........LAMEST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #67
87. So we have two candidates on the Republican ticket who have a history
of abusing their position of authority? Hmmmmmmmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadrasT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
55. Guys? Looks like WaPo started to "break" it and then wiped it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #55
57. If the story is so old and no big deal
Then why wipe it?
ay:wtf:

More crap swept under the rug that needs to see the light of day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whatchamacallit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #57
60. Maybe they thought better of it because it's old and no big deal n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #55
73. Maybe man~ana in honor of 9/11.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
61. This just in: Betty Ford addicted to pills and booze.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dems_rightnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #61
135. Impeach Jerry!
Bring him back to life and impeach him NOW.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
63. Whaaah Whaaaaaaaah


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
66. Lonestarnot -- is there more to the story that we're not getting?
The WaPo article disappearance is odd, and the comments that are still there indicate that was indeed the subject.

Is there something more than this guy's statement and diary? I'm disappointed by this as it stands now, but maybe your sources are aware of something truly deadly that hasn't been revealed yet?

Thanks! :hi:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #66
70. There is more, about Mccain tampering with DEA, etc. (helping lonestarnot out)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #70
82. It also shows that McCain enabled Cindy with a diplomatic passport. Also, they
way he took her out of the hospital didn't seem so much on the up and up. More to cover his embarrassment than to help her?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #70
85. Thanks --
but I'm asking, essentially, if there is more than "implication" or "whether illegal or not, it should be investigated" types of things.

I'm wondering if there is DEA documentation, for example, or other PROOF of these allegations. Otherwise, I don't think it'll be the knock-down we were hoping for.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #66
79. Yes there will be more. I don't know why RAW chose to break it today.
I cannot be more clear about the implications than some of the information on this thread. Go back on it and ignore the troll posts. Waiting and watching. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onefreespiritedchick Donating Member (846 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #79
122. Sorry to have been harsh...
Thanks for heads up, we know you had the best of intentions and still hoping this story will somehow have legs. Just wishing it had been more. :argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
72. I love you Lonestarnot, but I really hope that there is more to the story than this
First, if this was meant to be shocking and they wanted media attention for it, they wouldn't have released it on 9-11. Second, I hate to agree with everybody here, but this is a 15 year old scandal, and the repuke spin machine will spin this into the ground. If people aren't more upset at his ties to the Keating 5, they aren't going to be upset about this. Maybe they would have cared before Palin, but now Palin has taken over the campaign. I figured that he had covered for his wife, and have figured that since I first heard about the story several months ago.

Please tell me there is more. I believed in you, and I defended you, but unless there is more to it I don't see this as a giddy dance moment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
75. AAUGH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dreamer Tatum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
76. Wow, is it several years ago already?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #76
97. Didn't stop the pukes from digging up the past
when they went after the Clinton's. Not only did they dig shit up they made shit up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #97
362. How well did that work for the Republicans?
70 million dollars of our money wasted and Clinton left office with rather impressive favorability ratings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 01:34 AM
Response to Reply #362
365. Didn't say that it worked or not... I said that it didn't stop them from doing it.
But the difference IS.. the repiglithugs were on a witch hunt and made shit up = LIED (as is their M.O.) and ruined a lot of innocent lives along the way.

The McLameass story is different that is to say.. It's True. Pay ATTENTION!!!

McLameass used his power/influence to shield his wife's addiction to illegally gotten prescription drugs to save his own Lame Ass. An all too common repiglithug Mode of Operandi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
77. Pfffffffffttttttttttttttttttt
That's the sound this stinky fart of a story is making in on the happy giddy dancefloor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
83. released on 9/11? accident? no. it will die a quick death. something
will bump it off the headlines tomorrow and it will be lost over the weekend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Runcible Spoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
86. yawn. nobody will care.
what a letdown. It's like going home with someone really hot and then they pass out! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
88. Looks like I was right all along.
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 11:03 AM by Codeine
No story. Non-event. No impact. Bullshit windup.

EPIC FAIL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
90. The story is John McCain's covering up his involvement in the coverup.
It's not the crime, it's the coverup that took down Nixon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #90
96. Not two+ decades later it won't.
This is less than a story, and the whole board looks stupid for the fucking hype generated. I got told off for not buying into this by many people; turns out the cynics were right, again.

EPIC FAIL!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alfredo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #96
193. No, it is just another piece of evidence that he is unfit to be president.
Every lie, every deceitful act reported, builds up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
92. And this prompted your friggin' giddy dance?
good god, get a grip.

if this is all it takes to make you dance, then here's another one, nixon lied. OH MY GOD!!! TIME TO DANCE!!!

I knew from the start this was all colossal bullshit.

:banghead:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #92
115. But now we're concern trolls
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 11:23 AM by Codeine
for having the sense to see it's nothing.

Seriously, this fucking wild goose chase generated so much traffic it put the board into Defcon 3 or whatever and wound everybody up for nothing. How many threads did she start with her ALL CAPS HYPERBOLE!!!!???

This is THE LAWYERS SAVING THE WORLD? This is the game-changer?

I don't fucking think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #115
124. this kind of rhetoric BS on the part of lonestarnot should get him or her banned..
it's nothing but roomer mongering and the internet equivalent of yelling fire in a theater.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobalt1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
93. Frankly, even here this story isn't much
How do you think this will play to the general public? BIG YAWN at most, if they even see the story at all. I doubt people will even see it though.

What major media would even bother with it? It might make a couple of online websites, but won't come close to TV news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onefreespiritedchick Donating Member (846 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
102. I want this tory on the WaPo, NYTimes, and other major media outlets
However, it looks like it was scrubbed from the Washington Post. Not sure if the MSM thinks this has legs or not, esp happening 15 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onefreespiritedchick Donating Member (846 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #102
104. I hate to say, but I'm disappointed, as I really wanted something
of catastrophic proportions to hit the press.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
108. YES! THE LAWYERS!!!! THEY'VE SAVED THE FUCKING WORLD!!!

Little giddy dance little giddy dance!

This is all over the news!

Obama will get a 5 point bump out of this one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RufusTFirefly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
110. Comet Kohoutek is coming!!!!
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 11:29 AM by RufusTFirefly
Sorry, folks, but if McCain can callously discard his first wife after her accident and call his present wife a c*nt in public with little or no impact on the trajectory of his candidacy, this story isn't going to do a thing to halt his momentum, especially since a huge number of Americans appear to believe that "sticking up for your family" trumps "obeying the law."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
111. I feel sorry for Cindy. I can see why being married to McLame
would make anybody use. You'd want to be numb 24/7. She still looks like she is. BUT I would LOVE to see McCain go down for this. What concerns me is that WaPo removed it. Will they ever put it back up or did they get the major slapdown?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marlakay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #111
173. You reap what you sow...
I would feel sorry for her if she was an innocent wife deserted by her husband who fooled around and so started taking drugs to cope.

But this is a woman who stole someone elses husband then paid for his first public office in congress...

So I don't feel too sorry for her. She made her bed and now has to lie in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Hope Mobile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 09:02 AM
Response to Reply #173
379. I agree with that sentiment exactly
but there's no way he can be pleasant to wake up to :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ullad Donating Member (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
112. Cindy McCain talked about her painkiller prescription addiction on a recent talk show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lawclerk99 Donating Member (4 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
113. Issues
Lets stop attacking people and start talking issues so our side can win. Who wouldn vote for bo after hearing how different our vision is for the economy, war, etc. no one cares if Cindy McCain is a druggie or not. Talk issues!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobalt1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
117. A quick scan of the major online news sites...
Nada, Nothing.

This story is boring even here amongst us. It's not even on the radar for national coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #117
138. Exactly. This is less than a non-story.
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 12:04 PM by Codeine
It's Negative Story. It's the Black Hole of stories; it actually sucks the story out of any issue that gets too close to it. It drains the surrounding environment of all story until nothing is left but a vast empty expanse of

EPIC FAIL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cobalt1999 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #138
254. LOL at the Black Hole of a story.
Maybe that's what came out of that super-collider.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
118. This one goes on the shelf right beside the sure thing that was...
...Karl Rove's grand jury indictment.

Thanks for nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
119. why do we jump all over whisleblower?
especially someone who was being illegally used by Cindy McCain to obtain drugs in his name and could have faced charges for that? HEllo?

Clearly he wasn't being vindictive, since he approached the DEA with a "what if" scenario and did not go public with the info.

I think it's horrible the way we intimidate people who come forward with things; his journal clearly shows someone who was concerned for the lives of the entire family. It's called ethics.

Maybe this story will go nowhere but I think it is a total shame to condemn this man and write him off as an angry ex-employee. His career was ruined by them a long time ago -- AFTER he expressed concern about his own complicity in illegal drug procurement.

The war on drugs? oh, right. That's just for show and just for the poor people. We throw them in jail.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #119
125. Because there was no whistle to blow, that's why. this is old news
and does absolutely nothing to push the ball forward.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #119
127. we're not writing him off as a disgruntled ex employee
its how the mccain team will characterize him and its what the public will probably think since they won't have anything more to cause them to think otherwise -- 15 year old story and all that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #127
136. Was it already known that McGramps covered it up through his office?
I didn't know that. For some reason, I thought this all happened before they were married or something. Oh, well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #136
200. no, it seems like that is the new part to the story nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #119
195. It's known as kill the messenger. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #119
202. We've learned NOT to jump...
...at a single-sourced story.

If this is real, big-time media won't touch it without independent confirmation. So far, it's a pleasing story, but no more than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #202
219. I hear what you are saying
but I also see a conditioned response to the Dems being chastised constantly as attacking for political reasons.

If this were Obama, what would be happening right now?

OUTRAGE. he would probably lose over this.

And it doesn't appear to be single-sourced, if the DEA was indeed involved.

I have no stake in following up on this story; but I do have a stake in equality and the law. I object strongly to the cowering position we have been put in at the feet of the GOP while they lie, cheat and steal their way through our country.

illegal activity occurred. People who didn't have influence would have been in jail for this.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
120. OMFG! THIS IS HUGH!!!1`1!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #120
121. OMG! Is that a real sign in a grocery store????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PeaceNikki Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #121
123. Yes, I added the "FAIL" tag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #123
126. Do you have any idea where the sign was? I'm in NY, Jewish and
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #120
288. Lol
Hehe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:43 AM
Response to Original message
128. And since this flaccid piece of drivel has yet to be locked I will now
be officially blocking lonestarnot, just based on this contrived over reaction piece of colossal bullshit that tied up DU for absolutely no good fucking reason.

good riddance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #128
130. Frankly I think the story that came out yesterday and was ignored here is bigger..
that it appears that McShame covered for Heather Wilson's office in the Abramoff investigation.

Agree with everything else you said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #130
137. Did McSame ever meet a cover up he didn't like?
What a piece of work he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #130
230. how on earth did I miss that?
I was here almost all day yesterday. How did he "cover" for her office--redirect the investigation, or...?

If there's a link (I can never get the search function to work) I'd sure appreciate it. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #230
267. You missed it because
somebody was spamming the board with stupid hints and hype about THIS bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
132. ...And?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sheets of Easter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
133. Ha-ha! DU hates you!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #133
291. Never Ever presume to speak for me
or for the whole of DU.

I am but one of many here that LOVE lonestarnot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So There
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
139. Wasn't this supposed to be on Good Morning America?
I mean, after it was supposed to break at The Washington Post yesterday, of course?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
141. Just a couple of things to recall while we wait.
and "the DEA probe was completely secret; none of it was public record." and "Maricopa County attorney Richard Romley, a political ally of McCain, and asked him to investigate Gosinski for extortion."


Also a pug Rick Romley. I can remember how scared everyone was here when he was elected.

"Although the federal investigative materials were not public, the county investigative materials were. Romley launched an investigation, and one of the first things his people did, naturally, was ask the feds to turn over their investigative materials."


The whistleblower is and was at the time a pug.

"at the time, defense lawyers told New Times that if Cindy McCain had been a poor minority and not married to a U.S. senator, she likely would have been locked up."

"And only a handful of people remember the details of Cindy McCain's 1994 "outing" for drug addiction and drug pilfering, and the work of the McCain machine to protect her."

"But both of Cindy McCain's staged, teary drug-addiction confessions have been vintage John McCain. His MO is this: Get the story out -- even if it's a negative story. Get it out first, with the spin you want, with the details you want and without the details you don't want."

"McCain did it with the Keating Five, and with the story of the failure of his first marriage (Cindy is his second wife). So what you recall after the humble, honest interview, is not that McCain did favors for savings and loan failure Charlie Keating, or that he cheated on his wife, but instead what an upfront, righteous guy he is."

"Candor is the McCain trademark, but what the journalists who slobber over the senator fail to realize is that the candor is premeditated and polished. John McCain shoots from the hip -- but only after carefully rehearsing the battle plan, to be sure he won't get shot himself."

"This is the story of a time that strategy backfired, and yet the McCain machine still managed to contain the damage." And just how did he do that I wonder? And the story looms like a Vietcong over a POW. POW Batman!


http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/10/18/drugs/






Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corkhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #141
142. wait for what?
in a real world, this may have been real news, but my disappointment on this "revelation" was that I know that newsworthy or not, the corporate media will give McSame a pass on this, just like they have all election season. The net result is that it will be a non story.

That of course would not be the case if we were talking about Michelle Obama instead of Cindy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #142
143. If you seriously think this is nothing more than a peek at this issue you
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 12:03 PM by lonestarnot
need to blow your nose, have a look at what the focus of America is really on today (it is 9/11 nimrod and we do have a cat 3 hurricane about to blow TX off the map), and then fall-in or get the fuck out! edit for :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #141
165. "whistleblower is and was at the time a pug"
Okay, but he was also someone who mccain fired, which is what the public will have drilled into his head.

I checked out gosinski on open secrets and i couldn't find any record of him giving a dime to any candidate since 1992. If he had been throwing money at McCain and/or other repubs in the past, then we'd have a comeback to attacks on his credibility. But he seems like a small fry otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyFingerPop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
144. THIS IS NOT A FAIL...
In a sane world, this story would be all over the news.

Unfortunately, perhaps we do not live in a sane world.

You all know that if this were about Obama, this fucking thing would be growing hair, teeth, legs and eyeballs...and would be talked about 24/7 on the MSM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #144
162. ...
You all know that if this were about Obama, this fucking thing would be growing hair, teeth, legs and eyeballs...and would be talked about 24/7 on the MSM.

Absolutely. But it's not about Obama, it's about McCain, and therefore will be dutifully ignored. Liberal media my left nut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftyFingerPop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #162
167. ABUSE OF POWER, CAN MCCAIN BE TRUSTED?
ABUSE OF POWER, CAN MCCAIN BE TRUSTED?
ABUSE OF POWER, CAN MCCAIN BE TRUSTED?
ABUSE OF POWER, CAN MCCAIN BE TRUSTED?
ABUSE OF POWER, CAN MCCAIN BE TRUSTED?
ABUSE OF POWER, CAN MCCAIN BE TRUSTED?

See how it works?
WE make it a story.
WE tell everyone we know.
WE email news organizations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #167
177. I would love to see it happen.
But it won't. You know as well as I do, we could each write 1000 letters to each media outlet. "Lipstick on a pig" non-issues are FAR more important to our dear media. Any attempt by Democrats to make an issue of this will be written off as abusing a former addict who has apologized and made amends. How DARE we?!?! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #162
169. Well technically its about Cindy McCain
and though I despise her, I'm kind of got the mindset that unless ones spouse has committed a serious crime agaisnt others (fatal DWI anyone?) its kind of out of bounds to attack the spouse or children of candidates.
Think about this..Obama has acknowledged using drugs..and its pretty much a non-issue now. But it was with Clinton.
Pushing this story will only gain SYMPATHY for Cindy McCain as it is NOT her qualifications we are voting on..besides its fifteen years old. To think that people got all riled up about this..A waste of time and effort.
Pushing this story also smacks of RW smear tactics..we shouldn't touch this with a ten foot pole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trotsky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #169
178. You are correct again, sue.
Pushing this story will only gain SYMPATHY for Cindy McCain as it is NOT her qualifications we are voting on..besides its fifteen years old. To think that people got all riled up about this..A waste of time and effort.

Bing freaking O.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #169
298. actually, no.
It's about the fact that McCain and his office worked to get Cindy a Diplomatic Passport and covered up all of the shenanigans...

So you see, it's now about John as well as Cindy...

:)

As far as sympathy goes... do you have any idea how CRUELLY she treated this Gosinski fellow who worshipped her?

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
146. Don't let the doubters and concern trolls get in your way!
"... this is clearly a massive and overreaching case of both corruption on a personal sordid level and an abuse of power. And you might be seeing Gosinski on mainstream media soon."

http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=8147

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #146
147. I'm thinking the media is going to play it like it's old news
So how will this sink him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #147
149. I really hate to quote dr phil
:puke:

BUT :/sigh:... I have to agree when he says, the best indicator of future behaviour is past behaviour... Or something along those lines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #147
151. I'm not!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notadmblnd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #151
158. I hope you're right
I really do, but I guess I've just grown so cynical in regards to MSM that I cant see it right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #146
148. what do you think Gosinski's motive is?
you think he's terrified that the McLiar just may become CiC and feels he has to do all he can to put a stop to it? That's the ony thing I can come up with, otherwise why wait all this time. Last desparate measure to save the country, I'd say.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #148
152. He apparently has cancer and nothing McSame can do to him now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #146
150. link to topic explaining why this is big...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #150
154. Thank you again uppityperson! and than you berni_mccoy!
Stay on it please! I have to go! Will check-in throughout the day! :hug: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal In Texas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #146
153. JHC...the video is worthless, the guy isn't miked.
Amateurs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
independentpiney Donating Member (966 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #146
155. Sorry,dance all you want but this is going nowhere
A 15 year old story based on the hearsay claims of an ex-employee doesn't make a clear case for anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sewsojm Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #155
163. I was expecting some Big,
but this is pretty Lame!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #155
166. And I've only started a small dance jig today. Saving my energy for tomorrow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #166
168. Tomorrow at which media outlet? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #166
170. Tomorrow like yesterday?
Or do you mean tomorrow like today on Good Morning America?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #170
174. Ugh no that would be the day before 9/11, not the day after!
:D Now get on your reverent knees and have some respect for those of us trying to fucking recover what left of America!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #174
175. Whatever.
This is the political equivalent showing up for a Metallica concert and seeing two guys playing air guitar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivemom Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #175
184. ROFL! Perfect analogy :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #184
192. And I guess no one here would be surprised at your stupidity either!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivemom Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #192
215. Sorry, your *BIG NEWS* was a total letdown.....
but that doesn't mean his analogy wasn't dead on. No need to be abusive.

No one hopes more than I do that this is McCain's undoing. There's got to be a lot more there that what is currently being reported though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #215
218. And with 4 posts on the board, I bet you're a real judge of character and news when you see it too?
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #218
222. Well for the record, your creds are in the shitter with some of us DU vets too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #222
241. It's ok Shadow, I can take the heat.
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 02:51 PM by lonestarnot
How bout you, you can't wait to withhold judgment until tomorrow after 9/11 either? You of all people w/o a McSame to smack down any drug convictions in your life. I am really surprised.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #241
244. Nope, no convictions
You are the one who was hyping particular timelines on when this would break like a Mr. Leopold made the mistake of doing once my friend. I gave him no slack and I can't afford you any either. Still love ya, but IMO you fucked up this time.
S
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #244
246. We shall see, what we shall see. Peace brother!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #246
247. That's why you upset me so much
I know it shouldn't bother me so much but maybe you should step back and realize how important this election is to some of us. Literally a case of life and death maybe. It is hard enough to find hope to hold on to. I just don't want to be sold any that isn't 100% pure. To use a drug analogy lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #247
275. I understand your pain, but I really don't believe this is over.
I am going to give it one more day!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foo_bar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:33 PM
Response to Reply #275
342. what happens in one day?
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 10:41 PM by foo_bar
Lawyers I think. That's all I can say for now! They're about to save the fucking world!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3952119 (Monday, in a ~500 post thread curiously lacking a single reference to "drugs") (incorrect link edited)

DCBob Tue Sep-09-08 12:03 AM
183. Ok. sorry. I am new here and not aware of your credibility.
It's about the lobbyist Iseman affair isn't it?

lonestarnot Tue Sep-09-08 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #183
188. I am really bad with names. :)

DCBob Tue Sep-09-08 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #188
193. Gotcha!

WooHoo!!

(same thread, same choose-your-own-adventure theme)

LonelyLRLiberal:

I assume it has to do with JOHN McCain, not his wife. Is that correct? Otherwise, it's no big deal, because her drug addiction is an old story.

lonestarnot:

18. MCSAME! ONLY!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3964070#3964123 (Wednesday, contradicting Thursday's rawstory story)

This just in! Goodmorning America! Tomorrow morning! <...>

Connie_Corleone Wed Sep-10-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
27. Maybe you shouldn't post anymore until there is ACTUAL news.

lonestarnot Wed Sep-10-08 04:43 PM
Maybe you will tune in to Goodmorning America?
:eyes:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3967297 (Wednesday, contradicting Thursday morning's actual events)

TODAY PEOPLE TODAY THE SHIT IS GOING TO HIT THE FAN!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3964070 (Wednesday, contradicting Wednesday)

I'd stake my reputation as an honest, hardworking, truthful person that this is going to blow your socks off

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3952119#3953873 (no comment)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onefreespiritedchick Donating Member (846 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 02:03 AM
Response to Reply #241
366. Well, you do have my apologies.
It made front page news. Not sure how many legs...if any this will have, but thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivemom Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #218
223. How many posts are required before I can start hyping people up with stories to nowhere?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #223
229. Better wait until you get to 45,000 like LSN
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 02:27 PM by shadowknows69
Of course that's a fairly easy number to reach if you post three or four threads a day full of BULLSHIT that would get most people banned from here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #229
243. Just remember you walked out there.
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tallison Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #223
303. Welcome to DU, progressivemom!
Really.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #146
156. Exactly!! Pay attention to the hyperbolic chum throwers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Just saying...

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #146
157. Don't you dare call me a concern troll
after your pitiful windup. You spammed the board with endless threads for your non-story and achieved nothing but fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #157
176. if you don't have the stomach for this, just stay away from these threads.
wtf?

you sound angry and bezerk about all this. why?

instant gratification generation?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #146
159. but then again,
you might NOT be seeing Gosinski on mainstream media at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deaniac21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #146
160. Is 24 business hours up yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:13 PM
Response to Reply #146
164. The thing about the internet is, posting a wish over and over and over...
...doesn't make it actually happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #164
171. Even if you use ALL CAPS??!!?!?! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #164
172. Wishing
Wishing a power mongering club weilding PalinMcMoose/McSame (as their tactics are the same, ie troopergate/cindydrugaddictgate paralells are dynamic) doesn't overtake the country, and drive us off the cliff in the straight talk express bus over the bridge to nowhere because of stupid people that can't see their nose (and in the case of PalinMcSame ticket I don't know how they could miss them) I guess you'll be watching that nose then? :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MilesColtrane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #172
190. I'm contacting my local TV station to tell them that I...
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 01:01 PM by MilesColtrane
...saw lonestarnot kill, marinate, barbeque, and devour a human baby.

Sure there's no physical evidence, or second witness, but why should those things matter?

Hey as long as questions have been raised, it's all good!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
181. Shiny object not so shiny. Is that other one still standing by the 48 hour bullshit on rove? get
them back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #181
182. hmmmmf. No idea. Get who back? for what? who? when? where? why?
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmileyRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
183. LOL
I didn't respond to a single one of the threads where you told us all about your bombshell. I thought it best to just wait and watch. Sure enough - it was exactly what I expected. Of course, I had the advantage of you showing me what you are about during my first month here.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #183
256. Well bully for you
Pretty proud of yourself and very cocksure aren'tcha.

During the first month? Works both ways or do you not realize that? D'oh:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmileyRose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 04:56 AM
Response to Reply #256
374. This is true
I'm sure it was clear from day one that I'm not all about sensationalism and perpetual outrage and more about balance and common sense. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
185. this is interesting too:
"Gosinski details a conversation with Jeri Johnson, Cindy McCain's aunt, regarding Cindy's nanny, Diane, in a July 28, 1992 entry.
Diane voice concerns regarding Cindy's use of drugs and the effect it is having on the kids. Diane told Jeri that Meghan recently told her to "fuck off" after trying to discipline her. She also told Jeri that she is concerned that Cindy is giving the kids drugs which unnecessarily sedate them. I hope that is not happening.
Concerns that Cindy McCain is unnecessarily drugging her children appear again in a July 31 entry -- "Cari (Cindy's adopted daughter) told the three that she fears Cindy gives the kids prescription drugs they do not need," Gosinski wrote. "
http://rawstory.com/news/2008/Whistleblower_breaks_15year_silence_to_allege_0911.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #185
201. And don't we have that same parallel with McMoose drugging the damn kids?
Fucking druggers eating it and feeding it to the kids. Nice White House material egh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #185
279. Holy CRAP How in the Hell did I miss that part
I gotta clean my glasses better. Oh My Fucking Gawd.

I know it's not really provable now but my goddess ghost, what kind of monster drugs a child to sedate them into obedience?... um never mind don't answer that, I already know. My grandfather did that to my mom when she was little and I know exactly what kind of evil monster he was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cottonseed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
187. I feel like 100 giddy dancers just kicked me in my cold pickles.
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 12:54 PM by cottonseed
x(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NeedleCast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
188. This Story Will Not Matter
It's been pointed out again and again...Republicans DO NOT CARE if their candidates are committing all sorts of crimes. They don't give a shit. I am more and more convinced the Republicans only vote Republican because they fear liberals and what we stand for.

Even if this story breaks how you think it will, there are zero members of the Republican base who will change who they're voting for because of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
189. 99.99% of the public has never heard of Raw Story......

If it ain't in the MSM, most voters won't know anything about it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #189
203. A larger percentage than that do. Don't put up nonsense statistics.
It makes you look like a Fox News journalist. Raw Story journalists are frequently interviewed on talk radio and to a lesser degree on TV on programs like Democracy Now and Keith Olbermann.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
196. Very Disappointed - A Non-Story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
197. PHOENIX NEWTIMES HAS IT! WHAT MCSAME COVERED UP. Oh wait, that was 1994
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no limit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
198. Not quite the washington post and not quite a campaign killer, is it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #198
204. And then tomorrow cometh! :)
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fluffdaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #204
211. More hints? Tomorrow story.McCain busted for underage drinking 55 years ago
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #211
216. And I would expect a different comment from you why?
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #198
217. It WAS on the WaPo - It Was pulled but the Headline still existed
- it lead to a blank page. There are 32 comments as of 5 mins ago regarding this non- existing article on WaPo here:

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/video/2008/09/10/VI2008091002883.html

Give Lonestarnot a break - her facts/hints were correct. WaPo thought it was big enough to publish but, for whatever reason, redacted. Hardly her fault is it?

If you Google Gosinski you will see the WaPo headline, with yesterday's date at the bottom of the page - it has been scrubbed clean and unfortunately wasn't up long enough to be cached..

http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&hl=en&rlz=1G1GGLQ_ENUS239&=&q=Tom+Gosinski%2C&btnG=Google+Search&aq=t

Lonestarnot was right - WaPo chickened out, after posting the article, for some reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #217
226. I appreciate your support, but they have hardly "chickened out."
We do not know exactly what their plan is, but I think from further background information that I have, it is just beginning!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #226
231. I'm glad to hear it - stay strong. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
207. This is *it*? What the hell? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
209. This story is a mere fly-speck, and not of adequate megatonnage to fell the monster that is the GOP.
There have been so many stories of celebrity addiction that the public is not only numb to them, but in many cases, the public views the addicted celeb as heroic.

Any sort of "cover-up" in this 15-year-old case would most likely be viewed by a fairly forgiving public as small potatoes.

Sorry, but this story will not resonate, and will barely register on the public's consciousness.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #209
212. And join the rest of the crew on this thread that miss the greater importance of the power cover up
that is McSame's GOP Grandstand! Dee dee fucking dee! Christ! I can't believe how lame everyone is today. Could also be like "red" pissants on the honey trail? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressivemom Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #212
220. I don't think anyone doubts there is a coverup going on here.
McCain is disgustingly dirty. However, unless other people come forward with concrete evidence, then this story is going exactly nowhere. This one guy has ZERO credibility. That's not being lame, that's being realistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 01:30 AM
Response to Reply #220
363. Why attack the victim here?
The guy has full credibility. He is the one that the whole investigation against Cindy launched.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elizfeelinggreat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #212
248. 15 year old story ...
I see why people think that's how and why this will be swept away ...

NOT repeated over and over by the media ... like

WHERE Obama was born,
or where he grew up,
or that 20 year old COMMUNITY ORGANIZING,
or what church his father or he attended
etc, etc, etc.

Sheesh, it is up to our side to pound on the hypocrisy because this speaks to McCain's
character and experience that the GOP and the media is always touting - YES, it does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #212
278. If everyone is poo-pooing it, . . .
you should at least consider that it's poo-poo worthy.

And I'm no red pissant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VOX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #212
336. "I can't believe how lame everyone is today" -- I read "lame" as "realistic."
Sorry, I'd love it if this story had some kind of potential mainstream-media traction, but I just don't think that it does. It might have flown in 1976, but in 2008?

In recent times, Americans have become far more forgiving about persons/families in the public eye who are wrestling with various addictions. If you can stand it, consider how easily Rush Limbaugh wriggled away from any major fallout pursuant to his drug bust.

If this story ever graduates up to the mainstream media, I can almost guarantee that the McCains will not be bitten very badly. Rather, it will probably all be framed as time of personal sadness transformed by hard lessons learned and an inner healing, etc..

Over the past 8 years, I've seen * get hit with some real legal and moral turds, but he and the RNC attorneys keep cleaning him up before business hours. If the press = justice to you, which it seems too, consider that *, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, etc. are all walking around free as birds, insead of being incarcerated for their criminal actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
214. Sorry to say, but it's unlikely that a 15-year old story will have much impact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #214
221. And thank Peter you will not have the last word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #214
225. The Repugs would make it do so. I remember seeing hundreds
if not thousands of 30+ year old clips of Kerry when he turned against the Vietnam war. They used it to brand him a 'coward, traitor, unpatriotic'. If they can go back 30+ years, we can go back 15! They sure as hell would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dukkha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
227. WOT
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kayell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
228. What a dud. Ooops, I mean WHAT A DUD, WHAT A HUGE DUD!!!!
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 02:25 PM by kayell
Story 15 years old.
Alleged.
A cover-up that many Americans might actually sympathize with.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #228
238. Husband like McSame, or McMoose, my poor dear I sympathize with you. Divorce him now while there is
still time! Life is so short! :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #238
264. You are foul. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #238
268. That was out of line.
You're being a serious fucking jerk now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:52 PM
Response to Reply #238
323. Pathetic. Just downright classless
I've tried to stick up for you as best I can given the circumstances. Search it out if you don't believe it. No more.

That statement was as pathetic as the bullshit "story" you've been trying to peddle as something "major".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #323
341. She gets nastier by the moment. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
232. This is it?
Unless the retelling of this event starts with "GOP presidential candidate, John McCain" and not "Cindy McCain's drug addiction" this will get no traction and only work to gain sympathy for the ticket.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
233. OK...so what...as much relevance as McCain being a POW
This crap is a waste of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
234. I think this is a big deal.
Abuse of power, covering up his wife's crime and then lying about it for 15 years. Pig.

Do you have any thoughts as to why the WaPo pulled the story from their Website? And do you know if they have other sources besides Gosinski?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
236. Neocons are drug addicts and perverts at higher rates than liberals
I hope she heals her addiction and even her dysfunctional life. She could use some sanity. Cuz the path they're coasting down leads t h. e. double hockey sticks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #236
237. And on a personal level, I don' t want a druggie in MY White House, nor do I want a justice
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 02:52 PM by lonestarnot
obstructionist, trampling on any more of my fucking rights as an American or with his finger on the red button! YES WE CAN! GOBAMA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #237
242. yep, enough quasi-recovered drug addicts, alcoholics, and alanon rejects in power
why we didn't learn from Reagan I don't know. I guess we are a nation of dysfunction and codependents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #242
245. I have no fucking ider!
:crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #237
269. A "druggie?'
Like Obama, who has admitted illegal drug use? Or John F. Kennedy, who is legendary for the breadth and depth of his painkiller usage? Or the Big Dawg, who also admitted (in a half-assed way) to a few visits with The Herb?

"Druggie" smacks of freeperism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 07:51 PM
Response to Reply #269
296. We are talking 1991 and in addition there are allegations of current abuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:07 PM
Response to Reply #296
301. Your reply doesn't even make sense.
Perhaps you were responding to another post? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #301
314. Read it again, made perfect sense to me. You were whining about
Clinton, Obama and someone else using drugs. The alleged drug use by Obama was when he was 17, there are not current allegations of Obama using drugs now! :eyes: There are for cindy mcdruggie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #314
316. I wasn't whining about anything,
you rude little person. I merely pointed out that your use of "druggie" was childish, and that there are drug users who have occupied the White House before. You conveniently ignore my Kennedy statement, for example. Was his continued and heavy use of painkillers enough to make him a "druggie?"

Besides, who cares if Cindy McCain is using painkillers? She's his wife, not the President or Veep. No traction. Your bombshell was a firecracker, and your protestations serve only to deepen your hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #316
320. Oh an next you will be alleging he stole and forged the fucking prescriptions. bwwwa hahahaha
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 08:54 PM by lonestarnot
And she would be with the piece of crap dangerous man in the White House. I do not want the trash there period. She might hawk the fucking furniture! As I said there a allegations of current drug abuse as in now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #320
325. You are pathetic, Lonestarnot.
Luckily your recent behavior has demonstrated this to a wide swath of people here at DU.

BTW, your characterization of people with addiction issues as "trash" is downright offensive. Many of us have family or friends who have suffered from prescription drug dependency at some time in their lives. They are not "trash."

Still dodging the Kennedy bit, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #325
326. Not dodging addressed "him" And ad hominem attacks are what's pathetic you fuckwad.
And will you please adopt cindy mcdruggie, she needs a good loving home. Pathetic indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 09:03 PM
Response to Reply #326
328. The ad hominem began
with your characterization of my post as "whining." Blame the lowered tone on your own bad self, as you let that genie out of the bottle, Ms. Breaking News.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
240. I haven't given up on ya yet.
There must be more to it or WaPo wouldn't have pulled it almost seconds after putting up.
Anyway, I won't pass judgment until I see all the facts. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
249. well... this confirms McCain would abuse his power
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 03:08 PM by fascisthunter
very untrustowrthy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
251. Is there any proof besides some guys journal????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #251
297. I would really like the answer to that million dollar question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vanbean Donating Member (957 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
253. It might have been news 15 years ago
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 03:35 PM by vanbean
but you need to keep in mind the fact that many new voters were in pre-school or kindergarten when that story hit. Obviously Cindy McCain's drug abuse is not the issue it's John McCain's possible cover up that it. I was in High School back then and as most teenager (then) I had no idea about anything political so this is a new story to me as well (although I heard the stories about her drug use)

Also let me say, (and I am sure many of you will get pissy) that this is the reason so many people leave DU from time to time because of the stupid attack on one another. And we wonder why the Repubs find it easy to say we aren't united.

Lonestarnot I have seen your post before and I believe you that there is more to the story;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
257. LOL! Is that it?!
I'm amused by the number of people who got their hopes up over this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Papa Boule Donating Member (363 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
259. I think an apology is in order.
Bottom line... for the last few days, a category 5 shitstorm was stirred up over a zephyr. A zephyr that wouldn't blow Jim Cantore's hat off even if he greased his head with butter and stood on a stepladder. People, especially right wingers, aren't going to turn against McCain for this. Whatever he may have done, they'll see it as chivalry, protecting his wife and family.

I'm sure to you it seemed like a game changer, that you believed it was, and I'm willing to cut you slack for that.

What I'm not willing to cut slack for is the rumors that you allowed this shitstorm to spawn. Rumors that McCain beat Cindy, or that he has Alzheimer's, rumors that needlessly spread and buzzed while you played coy and tight-lipped about this non-story.

The reason such rumors started was your insistence this story was a major game changer. People quite naturally speculated about what kind of story really could be a game changer. You dropped hints prescription drugs were involved, and that it directly involved "McSame."

Since it was supposed to be a real game changer, and directly involved McCain, that 14-year-old, done-to-death story about Cindy McCain using drugs was a non-starter and not even considered. Instead, people went with rumors like Alzheimer's and other things.

You could have at least put the brakes on that rampant speculation. But you didn't. You let it go on. And you giddily kept on posting and posting with bouncy and laughing smilies, keeping shit stirred up. And as a result a lot of us, myself included, repeated some of the speculation, and today we have a lot of egg on our faces. And we said negative things about people, things that were, as far as we know, just not true. And that was wrong. And I apologize for repeating the things I repeated.

And now I think an apology from you is in order. No more hints, no more dances, no more bouncing smilies. An apology. It's time for you to end it, apologize, and let's all move on.

And by the way, to everyone here, I'm really tired of the lore that high post counts give posters credibility and gravitas. That belief is why this crap went on as long as it did.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fluffdaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #259
261. apologies aren't in some people, You see 45K posts and you think credibility.
Not always true
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samuraiguppy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #261
270. ha I see 45k posts
and I think--WTF--doesn't this person have a LIFE?

because as much fun as this place is--it is not a substitute for friends, family, fun....

so to me--having an outrageous number of posts does not necessarily equal street creed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #270
272. And you have racked up 350+ posts in less than 2 weeks. lol
And, that's "cred", not "creed".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samuraiguppy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:50 PM
Response to Reply #272
277. yeah--well right now
I don't have a life except the election--and I admit it. I was recently laid off from my job. i am angry and I am working to help take back this country.

And the election is the most important thing in my life right now. But once it is over--this board will definitely take a back seat to other things.

(even though it is fun)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #277
285. I've been under employed for two years. But that doesn't translate
into trashing someone because I'm bored.

Although, I've done stranger things while bored. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annarbor Donating Member (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:05 PM
Response to Reply #272
280. I've been here six-years and can't crack 400!!! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #280
281. Well, at least you can rule out a mouthy problem.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annarbor Donating Member (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #281
282. :) Yes, I can...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #282
284. I hope we can meet in the Lounge sometime and that you'll share
your secret. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annarbor Donating Member (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #284
290. Will do! And I'll add your name to my very short buddy list :)
I haven't had time to add more than three names and I don't think that I've been over to the Lounge more than twice. I'll make sure to take the time and stop by.

Ann Arbor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tallison Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #280
312. Yep - took two years off DU
as life happened, and election fever brought me back last week.

Nice to see it as strong as ever
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 04:56 PM
Response to Reply #259
262. I regret involving myself in those rumors as well...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #259
263. Why an apology?
She got what she wanted. Every one of her threads, reagardless of the topic or content, got huge attention.

Or did you think this was actually about a news story?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #263
265. She's saving face
She didn't know what the story was, only that whoever her source was said it was going to be "big", and she was not excited about the story itself, but rather, the fact that she had a heads up on it.

Now that it turns out to be nothing, she has to save face by saying more is coming or that we just don't get it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #265
276. surprised at you too!
But not offended. Maybe I should be. snort :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #276
292. You've been had
Whoever your source was, he/she hyped it up, giving you a false impression of just how big the story was. You, in turn, did the same thing. Understandable, but unfortunate.

Your source burned you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #292
293. And personal knowledge means nothing to you either I suppose.
The source burned no one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #293
294. This is a nothing story
It hasn't even been mentioned in the crawl at the bottom of the mainstream media. It's not the game changer you thought it would be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 07:59 PM
Response to Reply #294
300. And lynyrd_skynyrd is undue meddling in the justice system by a corrupt office holder ok with you
then?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #300
302. Utterly irrelevant
This is not about the validity of the story, it's about your making it seem like it would have been devastating to the McCain campaign. This is about you and your multiple threads hyping the story up, not about the story itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #302
305. Thank you!
This is not about a story, it's about the unchecked ego of a certain poster who spammed the boards with bullshit for two days over nothing. Nothing at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #302
311. Not that I really give a flying fuck about your criticism, but don't you need to learn
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 08:33 PM by lonestarnot
to stick to topic. Your 2nd comment is irrelevant to your first, that I, in response, inquired upon. So not worth discussing with you further. The referenced hype was not even about Raw's story but WaPo, which has yet to be released. And if you look at the boards, the conversation diverted from McMoose to McSame as it should be. hmmmmmf!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #302
317. Or maybe it's really about you forgetting you're on an internet forum
and checking your brain at the door.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #317
332. I didn't fall for it
In fact I didn't even respond to any of the threads. I even started a thread about how I found it amusing that so many here were getting their hopes up.

But up their hopes did go. I'm just observing the situation as it is. A poster started multiple threads over a period of days hyping up a story she did not know the details of and it turns out said story was not so spectacular. Now the poster is, naturally, in denial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #332
334. A poster started multiple threads about a story she was excited about
and now you're blaming her for the expectations of other people?

lol

What is the matter with us that we can't take in one person's posts without investing everything in them? That's just silliness.

And because LSN is not taking responsibility for the overreactions of other posters, you say she's in DENIAL?

That's more silliness.

The value of DU for those of us who hunt down facts are the facts, not the posts. That means, it's at very least as much our responsibility to think and check well as it is to just whine about the posts of others. And I'd be careful about making this an unsafe place for people to float ideas or hunches.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #334
335. I'm all in favor of DUer hunting down facts
My problem is with OPs who could check facts before they post and with DUers who automatically and unconditionally accept things that are posted as DU as true without making any effort to check them out (or sometimes without engaging in any analytical thought that might lead them to question the claim).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #335
340. It's a two-way street, for sure. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mudesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 09:57 PM
Response to Reply #334
338. Exhibits A,B,C,D,E
And this is not all of them.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=3965706&mesg_id=3965706

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=3967297&mesg_id=3967297

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=3964236&mesg_id=3964236

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=3964070&mesg_id=3964070


This last one is particularly bad
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=3973874&mesg_id=3973874


How can you possibly expect people to not have high expectations from all of that? The fact that the mods continued to lock them shows where they stand on "blame". Why continue to post something when you know it's going to be locked? Posting one thread is a hunch. Posting several is SPAM.

And if you haven't noticed, she is in denial, still claiming that this story has legs, to give it one more day, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:36 PM
Response to Reply #263
271. Exactly.
She fed her DU celebrity. Loads of people "vouched" for her. She is now rapidly being martyred for the "piling on" she's receiving. This had ten times more to do with LSN building her name and profile than it ever did with any imagined news story.

Gutless mods just let it slide while yanking threads that take her to task.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #263
273. So, should LSN apologize for controlling your keyboard through the intertubes?
"I'm sorry that you clicked on my thread and paid attention. I hope I'm never responsible for your abdication of responsibility again."

:wtf:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:10 PM
Response to Reply #273
283. LOL That's SO IT
"but.. but.. but.. lonestarnot MADE me click it. She reached through those intertubes and forced my finger to click my mouse over and over again. It was awful" :cry:

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #283
286. "You MADE me love you. I didn't wanna do it."
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 06:19 PM by sfexpat2000
:rofl:

See lovely Liza in my #287 below. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #273
307. It is pretty funny, "you got my hopes up so apologize to me".
wtf indeed. No personal responsibility for reacting to an anonymous poster's posts. Yup. Hitting some here (not meaning you, you just get to read my rant) upside with a clue-by-four. You didn't have to read, or hope, or reply.

sigh
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #307
344. Lets talk about personal responsibility
And how LSN played this like it was a game changer, teased it out for several days, was downright rude to people who challenged her, and then flipped it all away with shrug.

So yeah, a lot of people feel used.

And LSN takes what responsibility for that? OH. I see, it's OUR fault for being suckers.

You know what, you're right. It's my fault for getting sucked in to a fantasy. Will not happen again. Thanks for the burn, and the learn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 02:04 AM
Response to Reply #344
367. The fact of the matter IS....
That lonestarnot was privy to a story that she knew was coming and we didn't. She teased up, tantalized and yes titillated us. Personally I like a little tease keeps the excitement level up:evilgrin: but I digress..

She was right and the story did make the front page of the WaPo. I'm thinkin' any lesson she may have learned from this is to not say a damn word next time she's privy to a story before it it comes out.
Again it's the naysayers and people that take themselves too seriously and that don't let up for a fucking second that screw up some of the best things around here. Tighten those thumb-screws more, more, more.

And "several days"? Please what was it a day and a half MAYBE two. Get a grip or better yet, get a watch with a matching calendar.

At least you learned a lesson out of it so all was not a waste.

Lessons = Priceless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #259
289. I feel let down like you do
I wish the rumors were shot down - oh well :(

I'm extraordinarily disappointed at this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:16 PM
Response to Reply #259
304. An apology for you getting your hopes up for something?
You bit. You got excited. Take responsibility for yourself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #304
330. There's a lot of truth to what you say
I agree - we have a bad habit here at DU of taking things like this and running with it before we have our facts straight. It's probably our optimism that we'll somehow get a break since we usually end up getting all the bad breaks in election cycles.

But at the same time, this thing was sold as something more than it was. A quick Google search shows that this information has been out for ages - with the same "source" peddling the story to anyone who will throw cash at him. Post after post of exaggerated claims, whipping people into a frenzy, naysayers shouted down at every opportunity. When you taunt a dog with a piece of meat, putting right out in front of them and then snatching it away and moving it back, rinse and repeat, don't be surprised when the do gets pissed and scratches the piss out of you or take a bite out of your finger. A moderator even said in one of the posts, before locking it, that they were locking the thread but feel free to post when there actually is something to post about. I think that says it all.

There's plenty of blame to go around and it all fits fairly across us all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TorchTheWitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 03:30 AM
Response to Reply #259
373. very well said
I agree completely... an apology is in order. And I especially agree with you about the high post count giving credibility (and a low one being grounds for assuming someone is a troll). As far as I'm concerned a high post count means nothing more than preferring to give your own opinion as opposed to listening to others coupled with having a whole lot of free time. In my book the better posters are those that use what free time they have to write thoughtful, well reasoned, well researched informative posts, and I don't care one wit how long they've been here, whether or not they have a donation star or how many thousands of posts they have.

Welcome to DU. :)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 04:53 PM
Response to Original message
260. Pathetic. Absolutely pathetic.
Enjoy your fifteen minutes of anonymous message board fame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #260
287.  . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoRabbit Donating Member (554 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
274. Comedy Central is now covering it... no really...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
306. She's used drugs... SO??????
this will NOT sink a presidential campaign
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cwydro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
308. I think it is so fucking hilarious so many
people fell for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #308
309. And jumped on us cynics
with both foot as they did so. Fucking P.T. Barnum Day around here sometimes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tektonik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
313. You're a joke, you should probably stop posting until after the election
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:47 PM
Response to Reply #313
318. Civility, folks. It's that simple!
LOL!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tektonik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #318
321. angry rage smash
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 09:02 PM
Response to Reply #313
327. You're kidding right? This as another "24 BUSINESS HOURS" fiasco
She's probably basking in the glow of her newfound "fame" - good and bad. I used to have a lot of respect for Lonestar, but I've really lost most of it after this debacle. It turned into circus and the flames kept getting fanned as it built. Partially because of us for taking it at face value and part of it on her for turning it from a sideshow (which is bad enough) to a full blown three-ring circus.

Maybe the source oversold this thing and blew smoke up her ass, but she should have known better than to present it like it was going to be the magic answer to winning this election, especially when a cursory Google search would have shown that this is all old news - this guy has been peddling this shit for cash for years, each time saying he was releasing NEW, NEVER BEFORE SEEN evidence or information.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmeraldCityGrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:48 PM
Response to Original message
319. I thought this story was common knowledge and the
Obama campaign was once again taking the high road.

Someone needs to get a sample of that bleached rag on her head
and test it for narcotics.

Sounds like a job for Code Pink.:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #319
324. John McBomb's part in this isn't common knowledge.
And before you prescribe, can we see your license?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
322. please let it go people, it was a big thing i know for some of you but sometimes
things just don't work out.

Tomorrow is another day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 02:33 AM
Response to Reply #322
371. It certainly is!
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
329. The real sadness here is the way you treated people who asked
or doubted. You teased the truth, and sometimes crapped on people who challenged you.

What an unpalatable experience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #329
331. Yes she did,
and she continues to do so. Evidently the moderators allow certain people here privileges unavailable to the average poster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #331
346. Don't rag on the moderators
for this, Codeine.

I share your feelings about lonestar right now, but the mods did what they could with a crazy situation. Threads were popping up all over the place, and they were distracting. I'm sure that they received a bunch of complaints from a lot of people who couldn't be bothered to care about the promises.

And to be honest, I think that the result is that most posters won't take lonestar seriously, and all these threads served to do was damage her credibility. It's not the "I heard that there is big news" that did it, but the plethora of "RAH RAH GIDDY DANCE RAH!" posts that followed. In tens and tens of threads.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #346
347. You speak wisdom, Dorian Gray.
The tone of the day has gotten out of hand and I allowed myself to be caught up in it. Mea culpa. :blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dorian Gray Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:58 PM
Response to Reply #347
349. If it makes you feel better
I'm still shaking my head over all of this.

But it was a good distractions from the drudgery of the work day and the sorrows of all the 9-11 memorials.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #329
333. Agreed. It was a constant tease with no information - for a story that is common knowledge
Common knowledge for 15 years. It's a non-starter and a quick glance at Google confirms that its a recycled piece that has never grown any legs. Sure, it shows McCain for what we know he is and it should be out there, but there's a reason why it has never caught on - the source is about as reliable as Jason Leopold and his "24 Business Hours".

I started out intrigued, but it grew increasingly apparent that we were getting jerked around. I'm not sure if it was a fun game or the source might have been blowing smoke, but it could have been handled a hell of a lot better. And her "source" needs to find a new line of work because this definitely isn't breaking news or a bombshell - its a long dead story that has little potential to be anything other than a tiny distraction that only fills our hunger for dirt on McCain - not the people that need to be reached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bkkyosemite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #329
339. Well I'm still waiting until tomorrow but it seems they would not want to release it then because
of Ike heading for TX tomorrow. Then maybe it will be released Monday but the hurricane may have caused devestation (hope not) and it will still be big news 24/7 next week. Maybe the next week this important information will come out. But the storm will cancel it out on TV I'm afraid.

Lone I think you know more to this story and I still believe it is something people should be upset about but with so much going on I'm afraid it may fall by the way side. Unless it is really big really really big.

NOW the big story would be if it were true that McCain was on Aricept and the MSM took it on. Now that is a very big deal. Can't be President if mentally incapacitated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zomby Woof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 09:54 PM
Response to Original message
337. Raw Story?
lol





lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
343. The OP sounded about twelve years old from the start.
I don't see why so many were surprised at the outcome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:56 PM
Response to Reply #343
348. We weren't surprised,
at least not the naysayers; mostly we are pissed at the way we were treated when we expressed doubt about the "bombshell story" about to break. LSN should be made to feel as uncomfortable as we were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #348
350. fair enough. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brettdale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
345. rawstory?
This wont even get one line in one newspaper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
351. So Folks, When do the Apologies Start? WaPo Article 5 Pages!!!!
Edited on Thu Sep-11-08 11:49 PM by jannyk
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/11/AR2008091103928.html

Are you all big enough to retract your nasty comments and apologize to Lonestarnot.

Without her and others such as kpete, deepmodemmom, plaidadder etc., etc.. We'd all be as uninformed as fucking Freepers!!!


Personally, I think they are worth their weight in Gold (or Oil).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Codeine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #351
352. This is nothing.
It will have no impact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tektonik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #351
355. Apologize after getting a garbage story?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_in_LA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:55 AM
Response to Reply #351
357. snip from article
"It's not just about her addiction, it's what she did to cover up her addiction and the lives of other people that she ruined, or put at jeopardy at least," Gosinski said in an interview this week.

Cindy and John McCain declined repeated requests to be interviewed for this article. The McCain campaign also declined to comment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CampLo Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 02:29 AM
Response to Reply #351
370. just read that washingtonpost article
who in the world would side with that extorting rat Gosinski? Thanks for wasting my whole week lonestarnot. The only way to balance out the disappointment of the majority of DU if it came out that McCain kills hookers. EPIC FAIL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #370
378. No, he doesn't seem to have been an extorter...
...since he had already talked to the DEA before his lawsuit.

But he is a lone voice, so far, and his story won't fly without independent confirmation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #351
383. In all honesty, is that story a "game changer"?
If not, then you are missing the point as to why people are disappointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rufus dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 12:40 AM
Response to Original message
354. thanks
By the way the alternative weekly - New Times - rocks that is the only paper in Phx that ever took on the Repubs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bassthumb Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 01:07 AM
Response to Original message
360. Lonestarnot
Political blogger’s everywhere are laughing at you. You act like you broke a story yet you gave no specifics. How can you break a news story when you told us nothing? Please tell us… what is the game changer? Is it out there? Should we still be waiting for the story that will change the election? As far as DU goes Teaser had the only find!!!

I know your minions will be here shortly to defend you. But unless you have more to give, the DU faithful will see them for what they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 02:10 AM
Response to Reply #360
368. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
CampLo Donating Member (56 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 02:47 AM
Response to Reply #368
372. fail again
Why do you keep disparaging people with low post counts? Your attention whoring antics and unwarranted hype for this dud of a story has brought quite a few excited newcomers to this website, seeing as your original thread has close to 30,000 views, and the lurkers are not the only ones angry and disgruntled, seeing as quite a few long time posters are voicing the same opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fluffdaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
375. OK E-NUFF. We all give LSN a well Deserved Flogging.. Time to move on
Edited on Fri Sep-12-08 07:19 AM by Fluffdaddy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
376. You're good - very, very good!
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
380. Some times I find that a repeated story helps with understanding
the impact of the issues. This time it is understanding that John McCain might be involved in manipulating the DEA. I'm grateful for the people who do this. Thanks lonestarnot. And to all the ones on this site who are so brilliant that this type of repeat does you in-take it easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Belle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
381. This is old news...
It's hardly a "STOP THE PRESSES" big news item. It does nothing to John McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC