Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palm Beach County now has found too many ballots...instead of missing 3500.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 08:28 PM
Original message
Palm Beach County now has found too many ballots...instead of missing 3500.
This is really scary stuff in the same county that gave us the butterfly ballots and George W. Bush.

They now have the optical scan machines, and at first they tried to blame it on them. But no one really seemed to fall for it.

First they were missing 3500, then they found about a 1000. Now they found more than they were supposed to have.

In Palm Beach County it goes from missing ballots to too many ballots

There is a video there as well.

After a cumbersome resorting and recounting of ballots from the Aug. 26 election, investigators produced two new troubling findings Friday.

First, auditors have discovered electronic evidence that 110 ballots from voters at a Delray Beach precinct weren't included in election night results. Those votes also weren't included in totals from a recount. Second, auditors verified that there are 139 more paper ballots on hand at elections offices than the number of ballots reported cast on election night. The combination of the findings means there could be 249 more ballots than were counted on election night - though that estimate could change before an audit is finalized this weekend.

"We are no longer short ballots, we have more ballots," said County Commissioner Mary McCarty, a member of the county's elections canvassing board.


This is very bad, as there is a local judge's election which is separated by less than 100 votes.

Confusion and incompetence in Palm Beach County...who's got the ballots?

Once more, anxious eyes are riveted on Palm Beach County, home of the most chronically inept ballot-counting process in the annals of modern democracy. The latest farce began with a countywide election held on Aug. 26. Ironically, it was the same day that Palm Beach voters decisively dumped their perpetually befuddled elections supervisor, Dr. Arthur Anderson. (Anderson had replaced Theresa LePore, designer of the infamous butterfly ballot that threw the 2000 presidential race into chaos.)

This time, the disputed contest was between challenger William Abramson and Palm Beach County Judge Richard Wennet. Abramson initially won by a laser-thin margin of 17 votes, but a weekend recount put Wennet ahead by 60 votes.

One little problem: 3,478 ballots had disappeared between the election and the retabulation.


Now we are down to 249 more ballots than we should have. Bad situation.

One Palm Beach reporter theorizes that there is a common thread that links the two elections supervisors, LePore and Anderson.

The flaw that links LePore, Anderson

There they were, working around the clock last weekend to recount votes in Palm Beach County, and - as in 2000 - no one had set up a mechanism to track the recount. Back then, the supervisor was Theresa LePore. Now, it's Arthur Anderson. Eight years later, though, one thing has not changed. The supervisor's "information technology" officer, the guy running the machinery of vote-counting in Palm Beach County, is Jeff Darter.

I've heard complaints about Mr. Darter since the 2000 election. Palm Beach County got its two-week recount done two hours late, and Republican Secretary of State Katherine Harris famously wouldn't bend the deadline for the Democratic-heavy county.

Ms. Harris complained, correctly, that the results were incomprehensible. That's because no one at the elections office thought to create a simple Excel spreadsheet to track the results in an orderly fashion. In the final hours of the frantic run toward the 5 p.m. Sunday deadline, county employees - not Mr. Darter - hastily fashioned a spreadsheet and input the numbers that Ms. Harris found unfathomable.

Eight years later, Jeff Darter still is in charge of "information technology." And the county canvassing board is still tracking votes without so much as a laptop computer.


To top things off here, the icing on the cake....there is still no way to get a manual recount in close elections







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Florida does it wrong.
Florida provides that the Governor and two members of the Cabinet selected by the Governor shall be on the Florida Canvassing Commission.

This is not appropriate. One member of the Canvassing Commission should not be appointed by the Governor and should be a member of the opposing party.


Florida provides that the supervisor of elections; a county court judge, who shall act as chair; and the chair of the board of county commissioners shall be on the county canvassing board.

That is not appropriate. Again, at least one member of the board should be of the opposing party.

-----

Indiana gets this right mostly.

Indiana requires that the County Clerk (an elected official) is automatically a member of the County Election Board. The Democratic and Republican Party each appoint a member to the board.

-----

Without both parties represented on election boards it restricts access and accountability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Would Spain take it back if we gave green stamps?
How about Cuba? Would Cuba like Florida? The Floridians would get healthcare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I doubt they would want us.
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Even if we include the hotels?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 09:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. Unbelievable -- or, at least I wish it was...
This does not instill confidence in our systems. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. Is there any chance whatsoever that Florida will change its NO-RECOUNT law before Nov 4?
You know, in response to massive demonstrations by Democrats demanding an actual recount process. Or is that out of the question?

Also, what are the chances that this type of vote-counting "anomaly" is going to have a negative effect on Obama's vote totals in Florida?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:17 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I sort of doubt it. The GOP is in control here so completely.
Kurt Browning seems alarmed by it. But set me straight here...wasn't it part of the election bill in which the early primary bill was included? I am trying to find that out.

I heard there were some very bad things in that bill, not just the early primary. Trouble is the vote for it was almost 100%.

There was a post by the Sierra Club (?) I think that told the bad stuff in part.

Do you know if it was part of that bill?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-12-08 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
8. The new law starting now is really what should worry us. Not good.
http://news-press.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080912/NEWS0107/809120362

"Advocacy groups predicted this week that thousands, mostly the poor and minorities, will be denied the right to vote through no fault of their own under a new Florida voter registration law.

Secretary of State Kurt Browning, Florida's top elections official, disputed the claims, contending recent changes in the law and procedures make it "much more voter-friendly."

The state's "no-match, no-vote" law requires elections officials to verify applicants' driver license numbers, state identification card or the last four digits of their Social Security numbers by using government databases.

Lee County Supervisor of Elections Sharon Harrington said the new law will allow more residents the right to vote. Under previous laws, if a voter's information couldn't be verified through state databases, the voter would be considered unregistered.

But under the new law, she said, if there's no local match, the information will be sent to a state database. If an error is spotted under the person's identification, it will be changed and cleared. If there's still no match, the person will get a letter and will have until the election to fix the information. If there's still a problem on Election Day, they will get a provisional ballot and will have two days after the election to fix the problem."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. This shit reminds me of the old joke about the black man who went to register to vote and was
asked to read a book written in Chinese. The voter registrar almost fell out of his chair when the man said "yes, I can read that."

"It says No black people are going to be voting in Florida (Alabama, North Carolina, Louisiana, blah blah) this year."

Much More Voter-Friendly. Absolutely disgusting.

Sounds like it's going to take a massive voter RE-REGISTRATION drive to fix that problem. Then, of course, there will be delays due to computer malfunctions, overwhelming numbers of new voters registering, etc. etc.

I just wonder if the Obama organizers in the poor and minority communities could just begin to focus exclusively on this. Or am I being naive?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 12:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. The joke is funny, but the situation is sad.
The joke made me laugh. But the rest is sad.

I hope someone is working on this, but the FL GOP is not known for being very cooperative.

I feel though that Obama will have to bypass many of the FL party leaders and do a lot through his campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stevepol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. The FL GOP is known for being totally corrupt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JBear Donating Member (318 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
12. I just want to know...
why they can't count? I received a fantastic education in Florida's public schools (at least in Math and Science). How hard is it to go one, two, three.....

:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 08:44 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Well yeah, but freepers count one.. two .. many
Edited on Sat Sep-13-08 08:45 AM by Fumesucker
Let's face it, counting votes in a fair sized county is hard when you have to take your shoes off to count past ten.

These folks make Jethro Bodine look like a brain surgeon.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZ Criminal JD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Freepers are not in charge in Palm Beach County
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 10:23 AM
Response to Original message
14. Why are we having difficulty getting people to talk so we can start
prosecuting and put an end to all this? Our democracy has been breached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
15. Really, you need to get a foreign government, preferably Scandinavian,
Edited on Sat Sep-13-08 03:47 PM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
with arbitrary, plenipotentiary powers, to set up a whole "turnkey" election system for you, and to supervise its conduct, from start to finish, nation-wide. Trouble is, after all the harm the wrong wing has done to you, I fear you'd choose a Communist government. Not that it wouldn't be an improvement!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 04:26 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. What's the old saying "all politics is local"? From that evolved the local control issues that allow
Edited on Sat Sep-13-08 04:28 PM by bertman
this type of problem to flourish.

Everybody wants to hold on to their power in their jurisdiction so we can't get our National Government to set up and finance a national election system that might eliminate a lot of this local control and cronyism.

On the other hand, it might be just as bad, considering what happened with the U.S. Attorneys under Gonzales and Mukasey.

it's going to be a long, hard, vicious battle to reform our election processes in the U.S.

Wasn't it Jimmy Carter who said that our system miserably fails the test of election fairness that we impose upon other nations all over the world.

edited for clarity. I hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-14-08 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Empowering local government is lethal. They're empire-builders
Edited on Sun Sep-14-08 11:26 AM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
by nature, like all politicos. They're prone to have their hand in the till in various development schemes, so you don't want those tills to get too big.

The main purpose of our successive, wrong-wing Governments in decentralising taxation (flat taxes) and government in the UK, is to prevent the residents in richer areas being required to subsidise the public facilities in poorer areas. It has affected even the National Health Service in the UK - to the extent of the phrase "post-code lottery" being coined. Sometimes, it can mean a matter of life and death.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crimsonblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-13-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
16. looks likes Florida is gearing up
to fuck us over once again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal_rxstudent Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-14-08 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
19. Unfortunately....
this is not surprising. This issue is one that enrages me!!! I fear that this type of shit will hand the presidency over to the crypt-keeper...same as what happened in 2000. We haven't changed at all...and so many Floridians don't even know that this is going on (or they simply don't care). It is truly disheartening. If the McSame gets in, this country is going to hell in a handbasket! How many stolen elections will we have to suffer through before people start to wake up? As a Floridian...I'm embarrassed and worried that we will be seeing more parallels to 2000. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onethatcares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-14-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
21. Arthur Anderson, is that the same accounting firm
that worked the Enron deal? Ever check out their Wikipedia entry? Unfuckingbelievable that that firm would be hired to audit an election of all things.

The shit never stops, never, ever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC