Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WP: Cheney Iraq assertions "so far beyond the known universe of fact ...simply without foundation."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 11:26 AM
Original message
WP: Cheney Iraq assertions "so far beyond the known universe of fact ...simply without foundation."
Edited on Tue Sep-16-08 11:28 AM by BurtWorm
Dick Armey believes Cheney deliberately lied to him, apparently out of desperation, to get him to vote for the Iraq War Resolution. (A little too late, Dickie, but thanks anyway. :eyes: )


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/15/AR2008091503064_pf.html

Cheney Linked Hussein to Al-Qaeda, Ex-GOP House Leader Says in Book

Tuesday, September 16, 2008; A19

A GOP congressional leader who was wavering on giving President Bush the authority to wage war in late 2002 said Vice President Cheney misled him by saying that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein had direct personal ties to al-Qaeda terrorists and was making rapid progress toward a suitcase nuclear weapon, according to a new book by Washington Post investigative reporter Barton Gellman.

Cheney's assertions, described by former House majority leader Richard K. Armey (Tex.), came in a highly classified one-on-one briefing in Room H-208, the vice president's hideaway office in the Capitol. The threat Cheney described went far beyond public statements that have been criticized for relying on "cherry-picked" intelligence of unknown reliability. There was no intelligence to support the vice president's private assertions, Gellman reports, and they "crossed so far beyond the known universe of fact that they were simply without foundation."

Armey had spoken out against the coming war, and his opposition gave cover to Democrats who feared the political costs of appearing to be weak. Armey reversed his position after Cheney told him, he said, that the threat from Iraq was actually " more imminent than we want to portray to the public at large."

Cheney said, according to Armey, that Iraq's "ability to miniaturize weapons of mass destruction, particularly nuclear," had been "substantially refined since the first Gulf War," and would soon result in "packages that could be moved even by ground personnel." Cheney linked that threat to Hussein's alleged ties to al-Qaeda, Armey said, explaining that "we now know they have the ability to develop these weapons in a very portable fashion, and they have a delivery system in their relationship with organizations such as al-Qaeda."

"Did Dick Cheney . . . purposely tell me things he knew to be untrue?" Armey said. "I seriously feel that may be the case. . . . Had I known or believed then what I believe now, I would have publicly opposed <the war> resolution right to the bitter end, and I believe I might have stopped it from happening."

-- Jeff Leen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The Blue Flower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. This is SO hard to believe!
Did Armey include the story about falling off the turnip truck at an advanced age?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. More more more republicon LIES. This need to be a Dem campaign meme
This time the lies -- once again -- are from VP Dickie 'Five Military Deferments' Cheney.

But all the republicon homelanders -- including their candidates -- lie, lie, lie all the time to Americans.

Drive the truth home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DS1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. Iraq? A suitcase nuke?
Without testing one the size of a truck first? Or, actually testing one and getting away with it in secret?

Fucking idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC