Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House approves offshore drilling in 236-189 vote.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:51 AM
Original message
House approves offshore drilling in 236-189 vote.
WASHINGTON - The US House approved an energy bill last night that would allow offshore drilling as close as 50 miles from the Atlantic and Pacific coasts, but a last-minute provision added at the insistence of Massachusetts members would prohibit oil and gas drilling around Georges Bank, saving New England's premier commercial fishing grounds from potential harm.

The legislation also promotes investments in renewable energy and energy efficiency, paid for by eliminating tax exemptions for oil companies and increasing their royalty payments, and it authorizes more funding for heating assistance for low-income people.

The House voted 236 to 189 for the package.

The Democratic majority's support for expanded ocean drilling reflects mounting political pressure from an electorate deeply concerned about the distressed economy and high gasoline prices. Democratic leaders had previously criticized Republican proposals to end a longtime ban on offshore drilling, saying new wells would take years to produce oil and gas and thus have no immediate impact on prices. But with the ban set to expire at the end of this month and the November elections approaching, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi shifted her stance, proposing legislation that would allow drilling as close as 100 miles from shore, and with a state's permission, as close as 50 miles from shore.

<snip>

http://www.boston.com/lifestyle/green/articles/2008/09/17/us_house_approves_offshore_drilling/

Ain't that just grand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. Ever try to tell people that they drive too much?
If you do you'll understand why there's the clamor for drilling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:05 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I understand that there's a clamoring for more drilling, but this
isn't going to make an appreciable difference to the American driver.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Addicts aren't exactly known for their rational thought process
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
25. There's your problem
If you didn't tell people that they were addicts, and belittle their needs and opinions, they might listen more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richardo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
29. It's not so much the lecturing as it is the dogmatic, intolerant attitude about driving
And the inability to understand that not everybody's circumstances allow them to reduce their driving any more than they already have.

But make no mistake - it's also the lecturing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. Any guarantee that the oil will be kept in the U.S.?
Any guarantee from the oil companies that the price of the gas will be $2 per gallon? I don't think so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
5. More evidence that we're living under the two party/same corporate master system of government
Gee, wasn't the issue of off-shore drilling the one that killed Gore in Florida? Yet the idiots on the Hill pass this sop to the RW and a giveaway to the corporate masters, and once again, ignore their liberal, progressive base.

I'm still hanging with this POS party why? Oh, yeah, Palin scares the shit out of me. Hmmm, makes you wonder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:16 AM
Response to Original message
6. Bush is going to veto it
GOP campaign issue over. Democrats can claim McCain was for drilling before he was against it. Democrsts voted for drilling, republicans voted against it. Americans aren't too bright to know what actually in the bill. All they will know is Democrats voted for it, the republicans voted against it, and Bush vetoed it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:20 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Yep. And then the ban will expire, and they'll be able to drill
as close as 3 miles from the coast. Aaarggh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WePurrsevere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #6
22. Clever of the Dems.. hopefully it will work. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Loge23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
7. More economic socialism
Is anyone really surprised by this?
More drilling means more money.
More money means more money - for anyone (Congress included) involved in this giveaway.
Economic socialism means more money for the wealthiest at the expense of the taxpayers.
AIG today, Mobil/Exxon tomorrow.
We are so f!&$ed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
9. Dammit. Do people realize how long it takes to get these up & running?
Years. Years spent just doing the damn design. Then construction & testing. If by some miracle no hurricane destroys the platform before it goes online, it's 5-10 years before they will be pumping anything out. Then you have refinery capacity (both actual limits and limits imposed by executives restricting supply).

This. Will. Do. Nothing. Fuck. Shit. Fuck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
taterguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. That's why we need to start doing it now
:sarcasm: sort of
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:55 AM
Response to Original message
11. Devils In The Details...
Here's the part of the bill the Democrats were able to get: authorizes more funding for heating assistance for low-income people....something that WILL bring some big help and relief to people this winter. Expect heating prices to be as big a bite this winter as fueling the car...and at least here's some relief for those who will be hurt the hardest.

Yes, I don't like the drill, drill, drill side of this, but this bill stands little chance of getting through the Senate...this was political posturing that was another bone to the blue dogs...those who voted against the bill are now open to attacks of "they voted against asistance to help our elderly keep warm this winter"...that's another hammer on a bunch of Repugnicans in the Mid West.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WePurrsevere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #11
21. Thank you for the details that explain why they passed this. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 06:59 AM
Response to Original message
12. Thanks again assholes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:04 AM
Response to Original message
13. Mary Landrieu was on with Rachel Maddow last night
She gave a good explanation of why they approved it, and it did make a bit of sense. She also said that she thinks that they won't drill, they have lots of drilling leases offshore already and they aren't drilling on them. The next President can reinstitute the driling ban.

I'm not sure I agree with her or not. But as somebody upthread posted, * is going to veto it because drilling would have to be at least 50 miles out. And the state would have to approve. So by the time this gets through the political channels, President Obama can reinstitute the ban.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. yep. rock and hard place.
the pukesters want the ban to expire so they can drill anywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #13
36. That was Louise Slaughter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. I could have sworn she said Mary Landrieu
hmmm. It was still interesting, and the senate would have to pass it too, which is probably at most 50-50.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Misskittycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #13
38. Actually, I believe it was Rep.Louise Slaughter, but I agree with you
that her explanation sounded quite reasonable. I was totally outraged about this so-called "cave-in" by the Dems until she explained that if some bill doesn't go through, then the decades-old ban that on offshore drilling that has been in effect will expire and -- at least technically -- all offshore drilling will be allowed.

By this bill, there are (a) some restrictions on the drilling; (b) Dems get significant alternative fuel and other stuff in the bill that wouldn't have passed otherwise; and (c) the oil companies don't really want to do new drilling, as is shown by the large number of oil leases they already have and have failed to exploit. It also takes off the table the ridiculous "drill, baby, drill" meme of the Republicans, and the corollary attack that Dems won't allow the supposedly wildly popular offshore drilling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
15. This is way past laughable.
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 07:07 AM by ThomWV
There is not one single off shore oil drilling rig available for lease anywhere on the face of the earth for the next 3 years. They are all lease and scheduled. You could not drill off shore today, or anytime in the several years if your life absolutely depended on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
16. As a famous American General said as he flew over the Amazon
jungle spraying a defoliant to destroy drug plants,"Fuck the environment!"

:dem:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
17. This is another case where the dem leadership failed. Yes, the public will
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 07:14 AM by EV_Ares
clamor to something like drilling but still, they know there is no immediate result of this for maybe 10 years if any.

The dems should have stuck to alternative solutions and compromising on something like this never gains them respect from the American public. Yes, there are times when a compromise is good but this is not one of them because there is not going to be any really result from the offshore drilling and only possible environmental damage. The only ones who gained out of this is the republicans who use it every day pointing out how now the dems have come around to them and are for offshore drilling.

I think there is where in actuality the public sees the dems as weak which is why they have no respect for them in most cases as they see them as caving as usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
18. All politics is local?
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 07:38 AM by Xap
I suspect there may be some members of Congress who do not want to go home before the election and explain to their constituents why they voted against offshore drilling when gas is around $4/gal. Polls show offshore drilling is popular in much of the country (that would be unaffected by spills or unsightliness.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jayfish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:38 AM
Response to Original message
19. Democrats Are Terrible Politicians.
Where were the commercials and/or talk show appearances tat pointed out that oil prices have dropped significantly w/o new drilling?

Jay
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:39 AM
Response to Original message
20. does this take the punch out of the "drill baby drill"-ers chants?
or will they continue to chant like the koolaid drinking cultists that they are?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:46 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. no. almost all repukes voted against this.
the assholes will still chant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
23. Will the drilling fetishists finally get it when prices don't go down?
Nah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cboy4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
26. Yay!
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 07:58 AM
Response to Original message
27. Hurricane Ike destroys oil platforms in Gulf of Mexico ("at least 10" .. Feds).
Hurricane Ike “appears to have destroyed a number of oil production platforms and damaged some of the pipelines in the Gulf of Mexico, federal officials said Sunday.” Lars Herbst, regional director for the Minerals Management Service, said at least 10 production platforms have been destroyed by the storm, and possibly many more. Herbst said, “It’s too early to say if close to Katrina- and Rita-type damage.” In his advocacy for more offshore oil drilling, John McCain has falsely claimed Hurricanes Katrina and Rita did not “cause significant spillage” and that the platforms “very successfully” survived the impact of the storms. In fact, as the Wonk Room’s Brad Johnson has demonstrated, those hurricanes caused hundreds of oil spills resulting in significant environmental damage. (My emphasis)

http://thinkprogress.org/2008/09/14/hurricane-ike-destroys-oil-platforms-in-gulf-of-mexico/




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:03 AM
Response to Original message
28. Does Pelosi, and do the rest of the Democratic "leaders,"
have any idea how they undermine voters' commitment to voting for Democrats every time they "compromise" with the opposition?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #28
31. Apparently not, you would think drilling would have been taken off of the table.
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 08:23 AM by EV_Ares
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. If not, it's because
they choose not to. It's not like they haven't had the opportunity to pay attention. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 08:16 AM
Response to Original message
30. Thanks for....... absolutely nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Self Delete--wrong spot
Edited on Wed Sep-17-08 12:08 PM by tjwash
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
34. So this coastal drilling bill is going to stop us from invading countries and then shipping oil...
...halfway across the world then?

I realize it was politically expedient to "beat the GOP" to the drilling punch(the polls suggesting roughly 70% of people were for drilling and all), but FUCK. All these nitwits are doing is stalling the inevitable transfer to a less environmentally damaging sources of energy. We are also going to further damage our already dirty planet and increase the probability of another disastrous oil spill.

Interesting to see if it gets vetoed by Bush though...the bill also includes the elimination of $18b in tax breaks for big oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
35. PELOSI IS A WHORE
And a cheap, weak whore at that. Worthless piece of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC