Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

advise about maternity leave and CA law

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
samuraiguppy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 03:21 PM
Original message
advise about maternity leave and CA law
OK--this is not for me, but for a very good friend of mine.

She works for a company that is struggling and took off on maternity leave a few months ago to have a baby.

In July (while she was still on her maternity leave) her boss contacted her and informed her that she could not come back to work--her job was no longer needed. She hired a lawyer--her boss discovered that you cannot terminate a person's job while they are on maternity leave--and now she is scheduled to return to work on October 1.

But--they have changed a lot of things about her position--she will be coming back as a contractor instead of a regular employee--and she will be on a "probation" period (like a new employee--in spite of already having worked there for years).

Her fear is that her boss is setting the stage so that he can get rid of her after a discrete period of time.

We know that they have to have a job for her to return to--but how long is that protected? If they keep her for a month or two--can they then get rid of her with impunity? She is in California.

I am very worried for her--but coouldn't find anything relating to this situation on the web....so I thought I would see if any of the DUers had ever come across anything like this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. She should call that lawyer she hired,
and have the lawyer take care of it.

Asking for legal advice on a message board is never a good idea.

Good luck to your friend. And you're pretty sweet for trying to help her out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samuraiguppy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. well--we worked at the same place
(the place that laid me off recently) and we are really good friends. (just friends--her fiance also works there)

As horrible as that employer was to me--I just am stunned that they would try to do this to someone on maternity leave. But when I google it--I have found that this kind of stuff happens to a lot of people.

Sigh--why can't we be as civilized as the rest of the world?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. If by contractor it means she files a Form W-9 instead of a W-4, it
Edited on Thu Sep-18-08 04:03 PM by Cleita
means that she is essentially self-employed like a lawyer or accountant. I don't think the employer knows the law about this because it means she is doing more than just his job. Here is a link to the IRS explaining the difference between an employee and a contractor.

http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=99921,00.html

Here are the forms that the employer would give her for that status

http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=179114,00.html

I think this guy is setting her up to no longer require her services and he's actually in violation of the law if he is doing this. I suggest she contact the Labor Board. They have lawyers that can advise her and it's free.

Oops! Edited to correct second link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samuraiguppy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. you are right---
we are on the phone right now---

He is totally trying to circumvent the law on this...I hope they can nail him for it.

Isn't it amazing what people try? and what they actually get away with?

If she is a contractor--then they probably don't have to pay unemployment--that could be another reason why they went this way. What scum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC