Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Putnam Investments Closes $12B Money-Market Fund

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
cal04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 03:48 PM
Original message
Putnam Investments Closes $12B Money-Market Fund
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/18/AR2008091801792.html?hpid=topnews

Putnam Investments has closed a $12.3 billion money-market fund to limit losses to its investors, the large mutual fund company said today. The highly unusual announcement is the latest sign that tremendous financial pressures are now threatening even some of the safest kinds of investments.

The Prime Money Market Fund was open only to institutional investors. Putnam said in a statement that its board decided to close the fund last night after receiving a large number of redemption requests. The company said it could honor those requests only by selling assets at a loss, reducing the value of the remaining shares.

Putnam said it decided instead to liquidate the fund and spread any losses evenly among all the investors. "We wanted to treat all shareholders equally," said spokeswoman Laura McNamara. She said it was "premature" to discuss how much of a loss, if any, shareholders will incur.

The Putnam action is likely to increase concern among investors about the safety of investments in money-market funds, traditionally viewed as basically comparable to bank accounts. Investors pulled an estimated $80 billion from money-market funds yesterday, according to Crane Data, which tracks the industry. That in turn limits the capital available to banks and other companies that regularly borrow from money-market funds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-18-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. You know,
Edited on Thu Sep-18-08 03:57 PM by Mme. Defarge
I was probably in that fund at one time when my 401(k) with a former employer moved from Vanguard to Putnam. It would have been the default account. Which makes me wonder if many of the people who will get hurt by this are lower wage employees who have simply allowed their contributions to remain in this investment option.

:hurts:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC