Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OBAMA (Today): NO BLANK CHECK!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 02:04 PM
Original message
OBAMA (Today): NO BLANK CHECK!
From his speech today at Charlotte, North Carolina:

... the American people must be assured that the deal reflects the basic principles of transparency, fairness, and reform.

First, there must be no blank check when American taxpayers are on the hook for this much money.

Second, taxpayers shouldn’t be spending a dime to reward CEOs on Wall Street.

Third, taxpayers should be protected and should be able to recoup this investment.

Fourth, this plan has to help homeowners stay in their homes.

Fifth, this is a global crisis, and the United States must insist that other nations join us in helping secure the financial markets.

Sixth, we need to start putting in place the rules of the road I’ve been calling for for years to prevent this from ever happening again.

http://thepage.time.com/obamas-prepared-remarks-in-charlotte-north-carolina/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 02:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oskie Donating Member (66 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
63. Speak up against blank check. here's the numbers...call Congress now!
I just called Sen. Reid and Rep. Pelosi's office in DC : message -- NO BLANK CHECK for Paulson and this adminstration. NO trust in these people under any, dire or not, circumstances.

CALL them NOW-- show your support! Don't just sit there. Reid: 202.224.3542 Pelosi: 202.225.4965 Schumer:202.224.6542 Google for others.

Congress must HEAR from us and know we want Oversight & transparency, mortgage help for homeowners, no golden parachute/executive pay, & to include a stimulus package for average citizens. The assistant I spoke to said they pay attention to phone calls!! Send to all Dems...MAKE THE CALLS.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. 5th
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susu369 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yes!!!!!!!!!!!
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Finally!
I was so hoping he would say this...

Everyone - please stop reading this and call/email/fax your senators and representatives this afternoon. They are writing this now and will send it to Bush tomorrow. If you want to make your opinion heard about this - it is today or never.

Congress critter contact info - suggested verbiage from TPM, Robert Reich etc. here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x4051679
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
prayin4rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Indeed! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. No blank check is pretty vague...
Edited on Sun Sep-21-08 02:15 PM by cui bono
Is he going to fight to make it fair and not a transfer of power to the administration? I don't see that listed. No where did I see him address the fact that the administration will have total control of all of this, without being questioned, and with the advice of whatever outside companies they choose. Fuck that.

I swear, he better not fail this test. I will vote for him no matter what but will put zero efforts into his campaign if he votes for a bogus bailout plan. He lost me with combo of the FISA bill and not fighting back hard enough, then I got drawn back in with the conventions and McCain's sleazy tactics, but he damn well better walk the walk this time. Otherwise I will tune out again. And that isn't what I would prefer to do right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Perhaps this link will help
Robert Reich is his economic consultant and his article this morning outlines what 'no blank check' means.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x4051796
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Thanks. I'll list them (5 conditions) directly from Reich's piece:




My five nominees:

1. The government (i.e. taxpayers) gets an equity stake in every Wall Street financial company proportional to the amount of bad debt that company shoves onto the public. So when and if Wall Street shares rise, taxpayers are rewarded for accepting so much risk.

2. Wall Street executives and directors of Wall Street firms relinquish their current stock options and this year's other forms of compensation, and agree to future compensation linked to a rolling five-year average of firm profitability. Why should taxpayers feather their already amply-feathered nests?

3. All Wall Street executives immediately cease making campaign contributions to any candidate for public office in this election cycle or next, all Wall Street PACs be closed, and Wall Street lobbyists curtail their activities unless specifically asked for information by policymakers. Why should taxpayers finance Wall Street's outsized political power - especially when that power is being exercised to get favorable terms from taxpayers?

4. Wall Street firms agree to comply with new regulations over disclosure, capital requirements, conflicts of interest, and market manipulation. The regulations will emerge in ninety days from a bi-partisan working group, to be convened immediately. After all, inadequate regulation and lack of oversight got us into this mess.

5. Wall Street agrees to give bankruptcy judges the authority to modify the terms of primary mortgages, so homeowners have a fighting chance to keep their homes. Why should distressed homeowners lose their homes when Wall Streeters receive taxpayer money that helps them keep their fancy ones?



http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/09/21/what_wall_street_should_do_to/index.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. i love those
that's the ticket. sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Voice for Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #13
30. this is the first thing I have read that has made sense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
insleeforprez Donating Member (321 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #13
69. Those would be steps in the right direction
Especially the first one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. Those all sound very good.
Edited on Sun Sep-21-08 03:18 PM by cui bono
I'm still extremely concerned that I see no mention of not allowing the transfer of power from congress to the executive branch, of saying no to the no review. Has he made any statement about that anywhere? I'm still looking at stories so perhaps he has. If not he really needs to call them out on this and he needs all the other Dems to back him up on it.

Or would these terms negate that clause?

Usually I cannot stand to watch the Sunday morning shows, but I kind of wish I had recorded some of them. I'm wondering if anyone is out there talking about this to the public?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rosesaylavee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. The only thing I know to do today is call call call
my senators, my rep, faxed Dodd and hope that it gets thru to them that this is NOT ok. That as a taxpayer and a citizen I want to know what the fuck happened to cause this, what they are going to do to stop it, and who in the hell do they think we are to agree that a mere cabinet member creep can have unlimited executive power to spend our and our grandchildren's money.

Ideas on who and what to write here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=4051679&mesg_id=4051679
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #17
26. i caqught glimpses of a couple of them
and all i heard is that the sky is falling and this has to happen immediately. like you i believe the clauses that give paulson absolute power with no accountability or review just in my opinion cannot be allowed to remain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #17
29. I couldn't agree with you more. There is an online petition
which I just signed here: http://act.credoaction.com/campaign/no_blank_check/?r_by=911-1649119-iJHamrx&rc=paste

Here is some explicit language that should have been in it, or something similar, IMHO.


Sec. 8 Review. Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the acts of this act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administratve
agency. "

I call upon my elected officials to stop this from becoming law. This power shall not be given to the Secretary of Treasury. We are tasking you to defend our constitution, not throw away our rights.

If our democracy is to survive, you cannot cave to this measure. The Congress can continue to work with the executive branch to save our financial system, but you must work together to not give one person this power. It is against everything we stand for. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. SAY NO TO SECTION 8.

Please send this to as many people as possible and tell them to send it to as many people as possible before it is too late.



modified slightly from http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/09/21/what_wall_street_should_do_to/index.php


I added my own emphasis in the "extra message box" of the petition:



You must oppose any bill that

*Demands nothing from these firms in return.

*Holds the Treasury Secretary accountable to no one. (Section 8)

*Extends the most generous terms to Wall Street while offering nothing to Main Street.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rocky2007 Donating Member (156 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 09:55 PM
Response to Reply #17
40. I found this today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
37. I believe Obama best to stick with opposing the bailout, period....
Edited on Sun Sep-21-08 09:00 PM by guruoo
until Wall Street is so desperate that they come
begging for major reforms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 02:56 AM
Response to Reply #5
53. Right. If Obama does not stand up for the Constitution and the
separation of powers and for congressional control of the money on this, I may start looking at Bob Barr and Ron Paul. I don't agree with many aspects of their plans and I have never been interested in what they have to say. But standing up for the Constitution is so important to me, so fundamental -- especially separation of powers and the fundamental right to property that I don't think I can get out and vote for Obama unless he can fight for my rights on these issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
6. I am glad to hear him say this, but I''ll wait
to see the end result before I start whooping and hollering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
8. Note: "Plan has to help homeowners stay in their homes".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yuugal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #8
76. I've already lost my home
to the same crooks that want a bailout. So now I'm also supposed to put my kids in hock up to their ass to bail out the slumlords who own all these houses we now have to rent? We are bailing out the goddamn house flippers who jacked up the prices so high in the first place? We are going to bail out the liar loans? WTF is wrong with with Chuck Schumer and why can't he see people who had their houses stolen from them would like some help to.

Oh yeah, its because he is rich and needs to help his rich friends.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
11. YES!
It's a start.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. K&R !! /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UndertheOcean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
14. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
15. K & R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
16. As the bottom income tax rate on long-term capital gains becomes 0% this year!
The MAXIMUM income tax rate on long-term capital gains (the "investor class") is now 15% while the income tax rate on wages and salaries (i.e. the "working class") is 35%!

When you WORK for your income and get taxed up to 35% ... but have OTHER PEOPLE do the work and be taxed 0-15% ... then you know we're truly, deeply FUCKED UP.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
18. Word!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
20. Considering it's all Obama's fault, he BETTER have a plan to fix it.
he he
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
judasdisney Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
21. No blank check for telecoms! Fuck yeah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:22 PM
Response to Original message
22. Exactly right, K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
23. nice speech. can he make it happen? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
24. i just posted
a rant - but i had read on Yahoo something substantially different. i.e., obama wants to get this sewn up asap, and when he's president he might keep henry paulson on as treasury sec.

this is much better. but i still feel like i can't breathe to an extent. and i don't even have shit to lose. no home, no car note, no credit cards. my job is secure for at least a few more months. and i still am really distressed today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moriah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:37 PM
Response to Original message
27. Something I'd like to see is incentives to refi ARMs to fixed-rate.
A fixed-rate mortgage is something much easier to budget for, and perhaps an incentive to allow homeowners to refinance at a small discount from what the fixed rate is now or would have been when they originated their mortgage would be really cool.

Along with that would be to increase federal mortgage insurance coverage so people who, due to the devaluation of their homes, would face PMI if they refinanced, so they could get a cheaper rate.

And the last idea might not sound too popular, but currently it's possible for a person to live in a foreclosed home for months or years without paying a dime in mortgage or rent. I'd like to have plans so that, when a home went into foreclosure, a comprehensive budget analysis could be done, the mortgage-holder would be requested to pay what they can into an account -- when they moved or the foreclosure was finally complete and they HAD to move, give 50% of the amount in the account to use for a downpayment on their next mortgage if they do it within 1 year, and the rest paid to a fund to recoup some of the money we're spending on the bailout.

But I'm weird.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jamesatemple Donating Member (176 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #27
55. Hey! This "moriah" is no wind.
You've got some very interesting points in this post. Handling the interests of both mortgagees and mortgagors judiciously and fairly will call for some very informed thinking, followed by firm regulation. Thanks for your insight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dystopian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
28. KandR, Thank you!
This is what we've been waiting and wanting to hear and know....
And...I'm the only DUer with an entire post count of Ks and Rs:blush:



peace~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
31. That's my President!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
32. This bailout is a disgace.
This is a complete shameless rip-off. It's an enormous welfare HANDOUT for the rich in a country where we sneer at the idea of welfare for people who actually need it. Complete SCAM and racket. Privatize the gains, socialize the losses. Tony Soprano never had it so good. As Kucinich implored us, "Wake up, America!" This is a blatant fraud. We are being asked to fund the greed of the yacht class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ann_american2004 Donating Member (480 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. That should be on a sign...
Privatize the gains, socialize the losses? F*CK NO!!!

That is what we have already had to do with Iraq. Private companies have gotten all the spoils while we sacrifice our tax dollars and young men and women. NO MORE FOR ANYTHING!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:29 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. You bet! This scam is getting really old.
ENOUGH of this. Let's put these scammers out on their asses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
33. If any one of these f--kers is getting a golden parachute then..
they should call it off...I don't want my money spent on socialist priciples of propping up of companies by the repukes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
36. No fucking blank fucking checks!! Tired of this corporate welfare shit. nt
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:51 PM
Response to Original message
38. K & R'ed n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 09:29 PM
Response to Original message
39. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
IronLionZion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
41. I agree, now here is some reading for people to better understand the situation
I know this is a terrible time for a lot of people, but it's a great time to be in business school studying Finance and Economics. The stuff these companies think they can get away with just blows my mind. AIG are experts at insuring people, but for some reason thought they could insure companies and investments the same way. You can tell with scientific certainty how many people will die or get sick. AIG thought they could do that with business and investments. Now we all know that they were wrong. There were way too many bankruptcies.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bail_out_(finance)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_International_Group

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_crisis_of_2008

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_takeover_of_Fannie_Mae_and_Freddie_Mac


Chances are, you know someone who has AIG insurance, and you might be invested in them or their clients through your 401K. If this company collapsed, the earth would shake and a lot of good ordinary people's lives would be ruined. It would be a global catastrophe. The Federal Reserve bank got an 80% equity stake for this bailout. It's not a gift. YOU, American taxpayer, are now a shareholder in AIG. Responsible leadership can help this company(and it's clients) survive this. Believe me, NOT doing this would provide dire consequences. The last couple weeks have been nothing short of unbelievable. Nothing this big (AIG and Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac) has ever happened before in this country and hopefully will never happen again God willing. God help us.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
adamuu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
42. Error: You've already recommended that thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
43. Anybody who hasn't figured out we are being mugged at
Edited on Sun Sep-21-08 11:33 PM by ooglymoogly
gunpoint is a fool....and finally some sanity and backbone. We all have to fight tooth and nail to get this guy elected. Pull out all the stops with whatever money we don't have and whatever money we have...whatever it takes. We are at war with the corporate media and a bunch of thugs for our very survival.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
44. 100th rec
!!

Obama is unusual in past presidential candidates from the Senate in that he is actively using his seat to lead.

Where's the Frat Boy? He should be doing more than reciting his old prep school cheers in this situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
45. DAMN STRAIGHT
these bastards have stolen America blind for the past eight fucking years :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 12:04 AM
Response to Original message
46. May I recommend sending the statement in full to everyone on your E-mail list?


PLEASE pass this on to everyone on your address list



Statemend by Sen. Barack Obama regarding the financial crisis



http://thepage.time.com/obamas-prepared-remarks-in-charlotte-north-carolina/


Obama’s Prepared Remarks in Charlotte, North Carolina

Charlotte, North Carolina

Sunday, September 21, 2008

"The news of the day isn’t good.

The era of greed and irresponsibility on Wall Street and in Washington has led us to a perilous moment. They said they wanted to let the market run free but instead they let it run wild. And now we are facing a financial crisis as profound as any we have faced since the Great Depression

But here’s the truth:.


Regardless of how we got here, we’re here today. And the circumstances we face require decisive action because your jobs, your savings, and your economic security are now at risk.


We must work quickly in a bipartisan fashion to resolve this crisis to avert an even broader economic catastrophe. But Washington also has to recognize that economic recovery requires that we act, not just to address the crisis on Wall Street, but also the crisis on Main Street and around kitchen tables across America.

As of now, the Bush Administration has only offered a concept with a staggering price tag, not a plan. Even if the U.S. Treasury recovers some or most of its investment over time, this initial outlay of up to $700 billion is sobering. And in return for their support, the American people must be assured that the deal reflects the basic principles of transparency, fairness, and reform.

First, there must be no blank check when American taxpayers are on the hook for this much money.

Second, taxpayers shouldn’t be spending a dime to reward CEOs on Wall Street.

Third, taxpayers should be protected and should be able to recoup this investment.

Fourth, this plan has to help homeowners stay in their homes.

Fifth, this is a global crisis, and the United States must insist that other nations join us in helping secure the financial markets.

Sixth, we need to start putting in place the rules of the road I’ve been calling for for years to prevent this from ever happening again.

And finally, this plan can’t just be a plan for Wall Street, it has to be a plan for Main Street. We have to come together, as Democrats and Republicans, to pass a stimulus plan that will put money in the pockets of working families, save jobs, and prevent painful budget cuts and tax hikes in our states.

So I know these are difficult days. But here’s what I also know. I know we can steer ourselves out of this crisis. That’s who we are. That’s what we’ve always done as Americans. Our nation has faced difficult times before. And at each of those moments, we’ve risen to meet the challenge because we’ve never forgotten that fundamental truth – that here in America, our destiny is not written for us; it’s written by us.

But another thing I know is this – we can’t steer ourselves out of this crisis by heading in the same, disastrous direction. And that’s what this election is all about.

Because while I certainly don’t fault Senator McCain for all of the problems we’re facing right now, I do fault the economic philosophy he’s followed during his 26 years in Washington. It’s a philosophy that says it’s ok to turn a blind eye to practices that reward financial manipulation instead of sound business decisions. It’s a philosophy that says even common-sense regulations are unnecessary and unwise. It’s a philosophy that lets Washington lobbyists shred consumer protections and distort our economy so it works for the special interests instead of working people and our country.

We’re now seeing the disastrous consequences of this philosophy all around us – on Wall Street as well as Main Street. And yet Senator McCain, who candidly admitted not long ago that he doesn’t know as much about economics as he should, wants to keep going down the same, disastrous path.

He calls himself “fundamentally a deregulator,” when reckless deregulation and lack of oversight is a big part of the problem.

And here’s the really scary part. Now this “Great Deregulator” wants to turn his attention to health care.

He wrote in the current issue of a magazine – the current issue – that we need to open up health care to – quote – “more vigorous nationwide competition, as we have done over the last decade in banking.”

That’s right, John McCain says he wants to do for health care what Washington has done for banking.

Think about what that means.

Over the years, states have come up with common sense rules to make sure that insurance companies aren’t just looking out for their own profits, but for your health. And we cannot toss those rules out the window.

As anyone who has health care knows, the one thing we don’t need to do is give insurance companies an even freer hand over what they charge, who they cover, and what they’ll cover.

The radical idea that government has no role to play in protecting ordinary Americans has wreaked havoc on our economy. And we cannot let this dangerous philosophy spread to health care.

What we’ve seen over the last few days is nothing less than the final verdict on this failed philosophy. And I am running for President of the United States because the dreams of the American people must not be endangered any more.

The times are too serious. The stakes are too high. At this moment, in this election, we need real change – change that’s more than just a slogan, change that actually makes a difference in people’s lives. And that’s the kind of change I’ll bring to Washington when I’m President of the United States of America.

That’s the change the American people need.

Change means a tax code that doesn’t reward the lobbyists who wrote it, but the American workers and small businesses who deserve it. I will stop giving tax breaks to corporations that ship jobs overseas, and I will start giving them to companies that create good jobs right here in America. I will eliminate capital gains taxes for small businesses and start-ups – that’s how we’ll grow our economy and create the high-wage, high-tech jobs of tomorrow.

I will cut taxes – cut taxes – for 95% of all working families. My opponent doesn’t want you to know this, but under my plan, tax rates will actually be less than they were under Ronald Reagan. If you make less than $250,000 a year, you will not see your taxes increase one single dime. In fact, I offer three times the tax relief for middle-class families as Senator McCain does – because in an economy like this, the last thing we should do is raise taxes on the middle-class.

I will finally keep the promise of affordable, accessible health care for every single American. If you have health care, my plan will lower your premiums. If you don’t, you’ll be able to get the same kind of coverage that members of Congress give themselves. And I will stop insurance companies from discriminating against those who are sick and need care the most.

I will also create the jobs of the future by transforming our energy economy. We’ll tap our natural gas reserves, invest in clean coal technology, and find ways to safely harness nuclear power. I’ll help our auto companies re-tool, so that the fuel-efficient cars of the future are built right here in America. I’ll make it easier for the American people to afford these new cars. And I’ll invest 150 billion dollars over the next decade in affordable, renewable sources of energy – wind power and solar power and the next generation of biofuels; an investment that will lead to new industries and five million new jobs that pay well and can’t ever be outsourced

And now is the time to finally meet our moral obligation to provide every child a world-class education, because it will take nothing less to compete in the global economy. I’ll recruit an army of new teachers, and pay them higher salaries and give them more support. But in exchange, I will ask for higher standards and more accountability. And we will keep our promise to every young American – if you commit to serving your community or your country, we will make sure you can afford a college education.

This is the change we need – the kind of bottom up growth and innovation that will advance the American economy by advancing the dreams of all Americans.

Times are hard. I will not pretend that the change we need will come without cost – though I have presented how we can achieve these changes in a fiscally responsible way. I know that we’ll have to overcome our doubts and divisions and the determined opposition of powerful special interests before we can truly reform a broken economy and advance opportunity.

But I am running for President because we simply cannot afford four more years of an economic philosophy that works for Wall Street instead of Main Street, and ends up devastating both.

I don’t want to wake up in four years to find that more Americans fell out of the middle-class, and more families lost their savings. I don’t want to see that our country failed to invest in our ability to compete, our children’s future was mortgaged on another mountain of debt, and our financial markets failed to find a firmer footing.

At this defining moment, we have the chance to finally stand up and say: enough is enough!

We can do this because Americans have done this before. Time and again, we’ve battled back from adversity by recognizing that common stake that we have in each other’s success. That’s why our economy hasn’t just been the world’s greatest wealth generator – it’s bound America together, it’s created jobs, and it’s made the dream of opportunity a reality for generation after generation of Americans.

Now it falls to us. And I need you to make it happen. If you want the next four years looking just like the last eight, then I am not your candidate. But if you want real change – if you want an economy that rewards work, and that works for Main Street and Wall Street; if you want tax relief for the middle class and millions of new jobs; if you want health care you can afford and education that helps your kids compete; then I ask you to knock on some doors, make some calls, talk to your neighbors, and give me your vote on November 4th. And if you do, I promise you – we will win North Carolina, we will win this election, and we will change America together.


http://thepage.time.com/obamas-prepared-remarks-in-charlotte-north-carolina/




.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Miss Chybil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
47. I love Barack Obama. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmeraldCityGrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 12:18 AM
Response to Original message
48. He just won the election..People vote their pocketbooks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 12:25 AM
Response to Original message
49. OUR guy will come through for us!
:bounce:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
50. A serious leader for serious times
Thank you Senator Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 12:56 AM
Response to Original message
51. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 02:53 AM
Response to Original message
52. I would like to add that China should sell its junk to the Chinese
and pay its workers enough so that they can afford to buy all that poison junk they produce. We should invest in industry here so that we don't have to import Chinese junk.

And China (that is the Chinese government) should not be permitted to own interests in American companies through surrogate companies of the Chinese government. This global economy deal, this free trade thing, has led to this catastrophe. Free trade and the global economy do not work. End that fiasco now. Trade agreements should be negotiated for set periods of time, and each nation should be given the opportunity to negotiate and get in and out of agreements as needed to protect the rights of the citizens of their own nation.

Our current trade agreements have harmed us. Stop them now. Our money should not be invested in China, and their money should not be invested here. If they want to sell us their things, let them negotiate item by item.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoeDuck Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 04:41 AM
Response to Original message
54. I hope ...
I hope this isn't another one of those many instances when our party talks tough leading up to the vote where we give in to the power-mad Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zech Marquis The 2nd Donating Member (242 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 06:54 AM
Response to Original message
56. a giant kick!
why should these crooks get a blank check, when I myself, has been very responsible with my own money and yet it'll be me and all the other taxpayers paying THEM for their greed??? Hell no!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nradisic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
57. Amen!
Gobama! We the people...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
58. All I can say is we Dems have hitched our wagon to one hell of a horse this time
not a little one trick pony like the :puke: have

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geckosfeet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
59. Pretty much what I wrote to my congress critter this morning.
I also strongly feel that if we can find this kind of money to bail out investment bankers, we can find money for universal health care and education programs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cabbage08 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
60. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturalist Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
61. NO CHECK
This is what he said "Mr. Paulson is resisting efforts to limit the pay of executives whose firms participate in the program and plans to fight it "hard," according to a person familiar with the matter. He fears that provision would render the program moot, since many firms might choose not to participate." Can you believe this? I am more than xxxxx! I will not stand by and let this happen calmly. These thieves need to be in jail now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
62. The right plan at the right time.
Edited on Mon Sep-22-08 08:50 AM by Kajsa
The CEO's involved should forfeit their golden parachutes,
stock options and other cushy perks to help
in this bailout,also.

Why should they keep their wealth when others are losing
their homes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faygo Kid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
64. Exactly, No fucking way.
Not this time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happygoluckytoyou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
65. IN A RELATED STORY: McCain pulls blank check out of his ass
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
western mass Donating Member (718 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message
66. good cop, bad cop
Yet another example of how corporate democrats and repukes serve the same masters.

When Obama calls for NO BAILOUT, then we can talk. Otherwise, he's part of the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FloridaJudy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
67. All I have to say is


T'row da' bums out!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
99 Percent Sure Donating Member (355 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
68. There needs to be a freeze on foreclosures for a year. Obama
needs to be specific about that. There needs to be an(other) extension of Unemployment Benefits for 13-26 weeks. Corporations and banks, foreign and otherwise (e.g., UBS) that want to be included in this bail-out have to agree to be severely regulated by a council of taxpayer representatives, though not necessarily Congress critters or captains of industry, and must adhere to punitive measures whereby CEO salaries are tied to profits and, if they take any money from taxpayer bail-out plan, must distribute at least a portion of company profits during its recovery back to taxpayers. No way should Paulson be given total autonomy to distribute money to his multimillion dollar corporatist friends without accountability.

Actually, there shouldn't be a bail-out/buy-out of these bandits at. all. Let them fail. As Bernie Sanders of Vermont said, if the company is too big to fail, then it's too big to bail out.

Certainly, we shouldn't be bum-rushed into this, like we were the Patriot Act, like we were the Iraq Invasion. Taking a week to 2 weeks to map out a plan that first assists taxpayers who are in dire straits won't hurt We the People. If some of the companies go down in flames, then so be it.

Obama has two foxes in the hen house - Rubin and Summers - who are both responsible, along with Billy Jeff, for creating the massive modernization of the financial markets 10 years ago, ushering in total deregulation. As such, they shouldn't be advising anyone on how to manage this humongous robber baron crisis. Obama needs to return to the populist message he delivered in March at Cooper Union. This will assure a big victory for him in 6 weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arthritisR_US Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #68
71. excellent post!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arthritisR_US Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
70. Thank you Barack!!!! K & R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
72. No Blank Check!
K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pangaea Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
73. LEt the banks faile
and put the execs in jail.

anything else is democcratic capitulation.

americans will be fine... so what if a few rich people lose their portfolio....

focus on helping homeowners not banks..

folks this is a ruse..

we are being asked to really cut thru to the real facts...

let the banks fail.. we will never see this happen in history if we let them totally and completely implode
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graywarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
74. Beautiful!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhett o rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
75. Has Bushy's bailout/takeover legislation been introduced??? nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
77. Obama should Mock Palin: "Bush: Thanks, but No Thanks for this lousy bailout"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
78. It's time for a reality check...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 06:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC