Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Eliot Spitzer: Bush Stopped States from Going After Predatory Lenders in 2003

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 06:28 PM
Original message
Eliot Spitzer: Bush Stopped States from Going After Predatory Lenders in 2003
This is old news, but it sure looks a lot different now. In February, just a month before the first big bailout (approx. $50 billion to JP Morgan and Bear Stearns) New York Governor Eliot Spitzer wrote this editorial in the Washington Post.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/13/AR2008021302783.html

Predatory Lenders' Partner in Crime
How the Bush Administration Stopped the States From Stepping In to Help Consumers

By Eliot Spitzer
Thursday, February 14, 2008; Page A25

Several years ago, state attorneys general and others involved in consumer protection began to notice a marked increase in a range of predatory lending practices by mortgage lenders. Some were misrepresenting the terms of loans, making loans without regard to consumers' ability to repay, making loans with deceptive "teaser" rates that later ballooned astronomically, packing loans with undisclosed charges and fees, or even paying illegal kickbacks. These and other practices, we noticed, were having a devastating effect on home buyers. In addition, the widespread nature of these practices, if left unchecked, threatened our financial markets.

snip

Predatory lending was widely understood to present a looming national crisis. This threat was so clear that as New York attorney general, I joined with colleagues in the other 49 states in attempting to fill the void left by the federal government. Individually, and together, state attorneys general of both parties brought litigation or entered into settlements with many subprime lenders that were engaged in predatory lending practices. Several state legislatures, including New York's, enacted laws aimed at curbing such practices.

snip

Not only did the Bush administration do nothing to protect consumers, it embarked on an aggressive and unprecedented campaign to prevent states from protecting their residents from the very problems to which the federal government was turning a blind eye.

snip

In 2003, during the height of the predatory lending crisis, the OCC invoked a clause from the 1863 National Bank Act to issue formal opinions preempting all state predatory lending laws, thereby rendering them inoperative. The OCC also promulgated new rules that prevented states from enforcing any of their own consumer protection laws against national banks. The federal government's actions were so egregious and so unprecedented that all 50 state attorneys general, and all 50 state banking superintendents, actively fought the new rules.


Please read the whole editorial. Then remember that the Mukasey Injustice Department publicly set Spitzer up on a Mann Act charge. This is a draconian law that is used in political cases. Like Jack Johnson, who was guilty of the crime of being a successful boxer while Black. Most clients of prostitutes receive a misdemeanor citation from local authorities. David Vitter is still in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. It looks to me likeB*sh was stalling the inevitable... He needed this
mess to happen AFTER election day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetroxie Donating Member (152 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #1
41. They don't care when it happens
The fix in in and they are planning to steal the election anyway, so it doesn't matter to them. It's all Disaster Capilalism and Shock Doctrine, and they will use this "crisis" to force bad stuff on the population.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascistgroovething Donating Member (11 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. You think that's bad... look at the roll call on the Phil Gramm bill that started this all:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Let's hope this story has some traction. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Eliot "Ness" Spitzer was our hope in NY
Thanks again for listening to your little head asshole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senaca Donating Member (173 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. How would you feel about Elliott Spitzer being a part of the
team that helps formulate regulation policy and penalties for this mess to bring to Congress? It seems like it would be a waste to have him sit this one out. Would it be impossible to have him a part of Obama's team when Obama becomes President? Would he be considered? Didn't JFK's dad do something similar for FDR? Maybe I'm not remembering my history right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:18 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Joe Kennedy helped form the SEC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philly_bob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
40. Have Spitzer as Inspector General of whatever psuedo-agency Paulson creates n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Thanks again for letting BushCo dickstract you.
What kind of idiots would rather have leaders who fuck the country rather than hookers?

Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 01:04 PM
Response to Reply #8
35. !
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
37. Well said!!!!!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
34. One day, I hope,
we will become more like the French, and get over our obsession with sex. Hell, is it possible to get elected in France without having a mistress? It is just sex, as long as nobody was forced to do it, who was harmed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. I hope for that also. No more adolescent behavior re: consenting sex/politicians
that really is none of our business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. K&5thR Nothing surprises me anymore.
Just pisses me off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
6. K & R Almost a Cassandra kind of prescient. Too many enemies in high places.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 06:59 PM
Response to Original message
9. If Bush/Cheney had any honor, even the slightest shred of honor,
Edited on Sun Sep-21-08 07:01 PM by SimpleTrend
they'd both resign effective immediately.

But you know how it goes, RESPONSIBILITY is for other people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bleever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
10. NSA surveillance at work.
Wiretaps, flagged "unusual" money transfers...it was all a pretty fishy story about how he was "caught" using prostitutes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
11. There was a reason Spitzer was targeted. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CitizenPatriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. thank you for posting this
Edited on Sun Sep-21-08 07:14 PM by CitizenPatriot
I've been prattling on about it ad nauseam and no one seemed to give a whit.

THEY KNEW.

The states petitioned to be heard and were BLOWNN off by R congress.

the OCC just "changed" the law - no hearing, no nothing. Sort of like...a signing statement.

It is enraging.

edited to add: Spitzer was set up days before he was set to release a scathing denouncement of these practices (I read this a long time ago and detail may be off) -- It had to do with the banks and the financial institutions. He was completely discredited they day before his article (book?) came out.

That pesky DoJ at work again....against our civil rights but all for the GOPPERS KORP of AmeriKa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 11:21 PM
Response to Reply #12
22. Wasn't there something also about civil rights issue in defrauding minorities
in Spitzer's investigation of loans?

Why were Bush and Co. allowed to target critics and obstruct justice in a criminal scheme to defraud home-buyers?

Similar to the Iran-contra law breaking episode, it was too big and would have brought down the whole government if it went to trial? So the media and secret army kills investigations and silences critics?

That was somewhat of an excuse for obstructing justice when we were competing with the Soviet Union and losing seemed a possibility. But this regime must be corrupt as hell to break laws and prevent justice, while pretending to be at war with an emotion as justification of emergency powers.

Hiding from justice by corrupting the justice department, these scoundrels think that they are above the law. In letting them get away with it, the rule of law is lost.

Impeach these rascals and send the world a message of justice. It is necessary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. This is going up on 3 other message boards. Thanks for this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
14. What a loss to us that he was targeted and couldn't keep it in his pants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
McCamy Taylor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. More a loss that we fell for the set up. Craig and Vitter are still in Congress.
Spitzer was hounded out of office by the corporate media upon the orders of their bosses who did not want him spilling the beans about the dirty, illegal games which they and the Bush administration had been up to.

Responsible independent journalists tried to tell the public the truth from day one. People like Greg Palast here:

http://www.gregpalast.com/elliot-spitzer-gets-nailed/

A note on “Prosecutorial Indiscretion.”

Back in the day when I was an investigator of racketeers for government, the federal prosecutor I was assisting was deciding whether to launch a case based on his negotiations for airtime with 60 Minutes. I’m not allowed to tell you the prosecutor’s name, but I want to mention he was recently seen shouting, “Florida is Rudi country! Florida is Rudi country!”

Not all crimes lead to federal bust or even public exposure. It’s up to something called “prosecutorial discretion.”

Funny thing, this ‘discretion.’ For example, Senator David Vitter, Republican of Louisiana, paid Washington DC prostitutes to put him in diapers (ewww!), yet the Senator was not exposed by the US prosecutors busting the pimp-ring that pampered him.
Naming and shaming and ruining Spitzer – rarely done in these cases - was made at the ‘discretion’ of Bush’s Justice Department.

Or maybe we should say, 'indiscretion.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. On the Bright Side ...
I have a good friend in NYS politics who tells me everyone's pretty happy with Paterson, or at least they were over the summer.

Spitzer was pissing Albany off a lot, giving all the plum rewards to down-staters when upstaters suffered all through the Pataki years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bread_and_roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. This non-politician NYer will tell you that Progressives are NOT happy with Patterson
who seems to have done a Jeckle and Hyde and sounds/acts more like a Republican these days. Most tellingly, he has refused to consider raising taxes on the wealthiest - even despite NYs fiscal "crisis." No, ordinary people, who see their property taxes going up minute by minute, fees going up, their health care (if they have it) held hostage to prevent any pay raises, etc., etc. same old story - WE can pay, but goddess forfend that the rich should have to pay anymore. The poor will lose services, some may well freeze to death this winter, but we can't ask the rich to pay fair taxes. Go figure.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
17. k
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
18. At our Political Video Forum there is a video about this. Political Assassination - Elliot Spitzer
Edited on Sun Sep-21-08 08:42 PM by OmmmSweetOmmm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
20. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
struggle4progress Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
21. So that's why the banks wanted to find an excuse to sicc the Feds on him
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4 t 4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-21-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. The Re-pukes set this up way back when...
now if your foreclosed on you may not be able to vote, oh what a surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Revlon10 Donating Member (139 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
24. Greg Palast Pointed this out back in March 08
Eliot's Mess
The $200 billion bail-out for predator banks and Spitzer charges are intimately linked

By Greg Palast
Reporting for Air America Radio’s Clout

March 14th, 2008


While New York Governor Eliot Spitzer was paying an ‘escort’ $4,300 in a hotel room in Washington, just down the road, George Bush’s new Federal Reserve Board Chairman, Ben Bernanke, was secretly handing over $200 billion in a tryst with mortgage bank industry speculators.

Both acts were wanton, wicked and lewd. But there’s a BIG difference. The Governor was using his own checkbook. Bush’s man Bernanke was using ours.

This week, Bernanke’s Fed, for the first time in its history, loaned a selected coterie of banks one-fifth of a trillion dollars to guarantee these banks’ mortgage-backed junk bonds. The deluge of public loot was an eye-popping windfall to the very banking predators who have brought two million families to the brink of foreclosure.

Up until Wednesday, there was one single, lonely politician who stood in the way of this creepy little assignation at the bankers’ bordello: Eliot Spitzer.

Who are they kidding? Spitzer’s lynching and the bankers’ enriching are intimately tied.

How? Follow the money.

The press has swallowed Wall Street’s line that millions of US families are about to lose their homes because they bought homes they couldn’t afford or took loans too big for their wallets. Ba-LON-ey. That’s blaming the victim.

Here’s what happened. Since the Bush regime came to power, a new species of loan became the norm, the ‘sub-prime’ mortgage and its variants including loans with teeny “introductory” interest rates. From out of nowhere, a company called ‘Countrywide’ became America’s top mortgage lender, accounting for one in five home loans, a large chunk of these ‘sub-prime.’

Here’s how it worked: The Grinning Family, with US average household income, gets a $200,000 mortgage at 4% for two years. Their $955 monthly payment is 25% of their income. No problem. Their banker promises them a new mortgage, again at the cheap rate, in two years. But in two years, the promise ain’t worth a can of spam and the Grinnings are told to scram - because their house is now worth less than the mortgage. Now, the mortgage hits 9% or $1,609 plus fees to recover the “discount” they had for two years. Suddenly, payments equal 42% to 50% of pre-tax income. The Grinnings move into their Toyota.

Now, what kind of American is ‘sub-prime.’ Guess. No peeking. Here’s a hint: 73% of HIGH INCOME Black and Hispanic borrowers were given sub-prime loans versus 17% of similar-income Whites. Dark-skinned borrowers aren’t stupid – they had no choice. They were ‘steered’ as it’s called in the mortgage sharking business.

‘Steering,’ sub-prime loans with usurious kickers, fake inducements to over-borrow, called ‘fraudulent conveyance’ or ‘predatory lending’ under US law, were almost completely forbidden in the olden days (Clinton Administration and earlier) by federal regulators and state laws as nothing more than fancy loan-sharking.

But when the Bush regime took over, Countrywide and its banking brethren were told to party hearty – it was OK now to steer’m, fake’m, charge’m and take’m.

But there was this annoying party-pooper. The Attorney General of New York, Eliot Spitzer, who sued these guys to a fare-thee-well. Or tried to.

Instead of regulating the banks that had run amok, Bush’s regulators went on the warpath against Spitzer and states attempting to stop predatory practices. Making an unprecedented use of the legal power of “federal pre-emption,” Bush-bots ordered the states to NOT enforce their consumer protection laws.

Indeed, the feds actually filed a lawsuit to block Spitzer’s investigation of ugly racial mortgage steering. Bush’s banking buddies were especially steamed that Spitzer hammered bank practices across the nation using New York State laws.

Spitzer not only took on Countrywide, he took on their predatory enablers in the investment banking community. Behind Countrywide was the Mother Shark, its funder and now owner, Bank of America. Others joined the sharkfest: Goldman Sachs, Merrill Lynch and Citigroup’s Citibank made mortgage usury their major profit centers. They did this through a bit of financial legerdemain called “securitization.”

What that means is that they took a bunch of junk mortgages, like the Grinning's, loans about to go down the toilet and re-packaged them into “tranches” of bonds which were stamped “AAA” - top grade - by bond rating agencies. These gold-painted turds were sold as sparkling safe investments to US school district pension funds and town governments in Finland (really).

When the housing bubble burst and the paint flaked off, investors were left with the poop and the bankers were left with bonuses. Countrywide’s top man, Angelo Mozilo, will ‘earn’ a $77 million buy-out bonus this year on top of the $656 million - over half a billion dollars – he pulled in from 1998 through 2007.

But there were rumblings that the party would soon be over. Angry regulators, burned investors and the weight of millions of homes about to be boarded up were causing the sharks to sink. Countrywide’s stock was down 50%, and Citigroup was off 38%, not pleasing to the Gulf sheiks who now control its biggest share blocks.

Then, on Wednesday of this week, the unthinkable happened. Carlyle Capital went bankrupt. Who? That’s Carlyle as in Carlyle Group. James Baker, Senior Counsel. Notable partners, former and past: George Bush, the Bin Laden family and more dictators, potentates, pirates and presidents than you can count.

The Fed had to act. Bernanke opened the vault and dumped $200 billion on the poor little suffering bankers. They got the public treasure – and got to keep the Grinning’s house. There was no ‘quid’ of a foreclosure moratorium for the ‘pro quo’ of public bailout. Not one family was saved – but not one banker was left behind.

Every mortgage sharking operation shot up in value. Mozilo’s Countrywide stock rose 17% in one day. The Citi sheiks saw their company’s stock rise $10 billion in an afternoon.

And that very same day the bail-out was decided – what a coinkydink! – the man called, ‘The Sheriff of Wall Street’ was cuffed. Spitzer was silenced.

Do I believe the banks called Justice and said, “Take him down today!” Naw, that’s not how the system works. But the big players knew that unless Spitzer was taken out, he would create enough ruckus to spoil the party. Headlines in the financial press – one was “Wall Street Declares War on Spitzer” - made clear to Bush’s enforcers at Justice who their number one target should be. And it wasn’t Bin Laden.

It was the night of February 13 when Spitzer made the bone-headed choice to order take-out in his Washington Hotel room. He had just finished signing these words for the Washington Post about predatory loans:

“Not only did the Bush administration do nothing to protect consumers, it embarked on an aggressive and unprecedented campaign to prevent states from protecting their residents from the very problems to which the federal government was turning a blind eye.”

Bush, Spitzer said right in the headline, was the “Predator Lenders’ Partner in Crime.” The President, said Spitzer, was a fugitive from justice. And Spitzer was in Washington to launch a campaign to take on the Bush regime and the biggest financial powers on the planet.

Spitzer wrote, “When history tells the story of the subprime lending crisis and recounts its devastating effects on the lives of so many innocent homeowners the Bush administration will not be judged favorably.”

But now, the Administration can rest assured that this love story – of Bush and his bankers - will not be told by history at all – now that the Sheriff of Wall Street has fallen on his own gun.

A note on “Prosecutorial Indiscretion.”

Back in the day when I was an investigator of racketeers for government, the federal prosecutor I was assisting was deciding whether to launch a case based on his negotiations for airtime with 60 Minutes. I’m not allowed to tell you the prosecutor’s name, but I want to mention he was recently seen shouting, “Florida is Rudi country! Florida is Rudi country!”

Not all crimes lead to federal bust or even public exposure. It’s up to something called “prosecutorial discretion.”

Funny thing, this ‘discretion.’ For example, Senator David Vitter, Republican of Louisiana, paid Washington DC prostitutes to put him in diapers (ewww!), yet the Senator was not exposed by the US prosecutors busting the pimp-ring that pampered him.
Naming and shaming and ruining Spitzer – rarely done in these cases - was made at the ‘discretion’ of Bush’s Justice Department.

Or maybe we should say, 'indiscretion.'

************
Greg Palast, former investigator of financial fraud, is the author of the New York Times bestsellers Armed Madhouse and The Best Democracy Money Can Buy.

Hear The Palast Report weekly on Air America Radio’s Clout.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
26. That explains why they went after Spitzer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Bingo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peekaloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
28. kick
i feel sick. :-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadinMo Donating Member (519 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 09:55 AM
Response to Original message
29. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
think Donating Member (316 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. Needs to be posted on as many forums as possible
Thanks to the thread starter for reminding me about this. I knew something had been written on this subject earlier this year but couldn't remember what it was. So many distractions in life.

People need to know what lead to the current financial crisis and this is as plain as it gets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 10:19 AM
Response to Original message
31. the OCC - see which Media outlets which now openly promote the bailout plan have the guts to mention
the OCC decision.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
32. Of Course bush & gang did!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
33. The financial 9/11 and the Department of Homeland Financial Security
Seen that movie before?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #33
42. And we've just gone from LIHOP to MIHOP. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
13 Hawks Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
38. Bush Bought the Election!
Bush essentially 'bought' the 2004 election with these loans
to people who couldn't afford it. Think about it. Millions of
people getting homes they couldn't afford. So they think,
"Hey, what a great country. What a great president. I'm
voting for him because I just got a dream house!" Pretty
clever. And sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr Hedley Bowes Donating Member (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
39. Let's call it the "Get out of jail free" Act of 2008
Edited on Mon Sep-22-08 02:19 PM by Mr Hedley Bowes
Glad to see this today. The Spitzer column of February 14 points to the smoking gun. The Paulson Act will do more to cover up criminal activity by the Bush Maladministration than solving any financial crisis. This is a 'Get out of jail free' card for perpetrators and those in government who ran cover for them.

We received offer after offer for mortgage loans in the mail between 2004 and 2006, one even from WaMu. How they thought we could qualify on our meager income is beyond me, so into the recycling they went. I thought I was being wise in not taking the bait. Now our family is going to get stuck with a $12,000 to $24,000 bill (PLUS INTEREST) to bail out the predatory lenders who tried to foist this garbage that we so politely declined.

I am outraged.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 05:18 PM
Response to Original message
43. So much for states rights
With Republicans, it was nothing more than a smokescreen to support segregation anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kurovski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
44. Bush stopped and started a lot of stuff, didn't he?
He's the king, baby! K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
45. Excellent find, McCamy.
Happy to rec
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
46. Thanks, how did you find that op-ed? NT
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-22-08 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
47. astounding.

i'd love to have a chat with Eliot and have him explain to me what's really going on right now.

as far as i'm concerned, everybody is just mentally paralized and cannot grasp the idea that we are being F*CKED right now.

i'm sure Eliot wouldn't have any illusions about Bushco's intentions.


no wonder he got politicaly "suicided". what a shame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC