Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democrats in Danger

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
earthside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 09:46 AM
Original message
Democrats in Danger
I'm listening to radio, I'm talking to neighbors, I'm talking to local business folks, I'm talking to Republicans and Democrats and unaffiliateds -- no one is in favor of the "Bush Cronyism Bailout Plan".

And, there is real, genuine anger about this, even with the 'compromises' that allegedly make the bailout more Main Street friendly.

How the backlash will come is anyone's guess, but if it looks like the Congressional Democrats are the prime movers of this plan (along with Bush, for god's sake) then there will be hell to pay.

Why are we hearing that a bill is just about ready and that there are the votes in Congress to pass it?

I'm stunned.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BayouBengal07 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
1. And if Obama inherits it
they could lay the blame squarely at our feet, even though they blamed the 9/11 on Clinton and attributed the economic prosperity of the 1990s to Reagan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 09:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think passing the bill may cause a worse reaction than doing nothing.
I think people want to see what the bill looks like.. if its still to similar to what Bush is asking, then I'm affraid that this will be really bad.. these congresscritters will need massive amts of security to protect them, and they may just lose their seats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halfstep Donating Member (58 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 09:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. Good point but........
it seems like mccain is going to try and play hero in getting this bill done...so if he is going to run on the "it took a maverick" to get it passed then it wont hurt dems....could help mccain though considering how dumb the sheople are!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. Why are you under the impression that the Dems are the prime movers?
Both Dems and Reps reacted negatively and it was the Dems (I think) who initially put in the safeguards and conditions.

I'm not sure either party is willing to do NOTHING. So, whatever they approve - or don't - will be pretty much bi-partisan, I think.

It's ridiculous to blame the Dems.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Barney Frank was out there saying the House plan will pass no problem
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Pelosi and Reid came out in favor almost immediately, had to pull back when a furor erupted. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #4
7.  "Bipartisan" = "they're BOTH to blame". Why would you think Dems WOULDN'T deserve blame?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 10:20 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Agree -- but the entire blame doesn't lie with the Dems was how I
should have stated it.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. It hurts more when someone you trusted screws you. It's human nature. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Agree. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. I think the Dems are trying to look like they're on the problem
But the perception is that everyone is moving too quickly on this. I want fucking details. At least let us know how and when you're going to fuck us so we can lube up a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
9. "Government CAUSED it" is the meme today from Republicans.
Further they are saying the answer is MORE deregulation, "Let the markets work and keep government out of it".


It is a risky proposition. Personally I think they should go with Shuemer's idea of $150 billion to start.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crazylikafox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #9
19. Almost choked on my coffee this AM when I saw that. Some idiot Pub congresscritter
Said Repubs won't vote for the plan until Dems admit that the cause of the problem is too much Gov. Regulation. WE all know that it was the opposite, NO regulation or oversight, in addition to corporate greed, caused the problem. They're trying to blame the whole thing on Fannie & Freddie. As I understand it, Fannie & Freddie didn't even buy the worst of the sub-prime and "creative" mortgage loans.

And people actually believe this shit. We need MORE deregulation?? Dems need to apologize for this? Do they really think Americans are this stupid????? Are they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
10. I've written and called my two Democratic Senators and threatened them that I will vote against
anybody that supports an administration-based plan. Keep calling and telling them that there is no need to rush through this 'bailout' because Bush is hysteric. We need to look at all alternate plans being proposed by economists around the country. We need to see some proof that credit is drying up. We need a list of whom the administration/Paulson wants to give money to. We need to stop this!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
11. "compromises that allegedly make the bailout more Main St
friendly" is just lip service to passify the ignorant masses. The news that this will pass is PROOF of this. One has to be willfully fucking ignorant not to see the obvious that our side is just as fucking bad on this issue though at least they make an attempt to talk the talk for show at hearings but nobody with half a brain is fooled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lifesbeautifulmagic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
12. Repukes win again, this time twice
Edited on Thu Sep-25-08 10:17 AM by brandnewlaptop
one, by diluting what should be the best dem election ever

and two, by shoveling even more money to their uber rich wall street friends and corp ceo's, what with their multi multi million salaries and bonus's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 10:26 AM
Response to Original message
15. Bad policy and bad politics.
Republicans can run against Democrats who vote for it as big spenders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 10:31 AM
Response to Original message
16. read this thread
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-25-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
18. I'm not. I expect the dems to bend over and give bush what he wants.
Just like they bend over to fund the Iraq war.
Just like they bent over for telecom immunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC