Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did anyone else catch Bush's freudian slip on CNN about 3 minutes ago?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread		 This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
go west young man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 11:12 AM
Original message
Did anyone else catch Bush's freudian slip on CNN about 3 minutes ago?
He said that lawmakers are in agreement that "something suspic" then quickly says "substantial" must be done. If anyone ever wanted proof this is all bullshit that freudian slip is it. I hope someone has that shit Tivoed and can post it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. good catch... a most definite tell
IMO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. specific,
he was going to say specific, then changed it to substantial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
go west young man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It sounded like suspi not spec.
Granted Bush does have screwed up pronounciation but I heard suspi not spec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 11:27 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I guess conspiracy theories
is easier than trying to understand the complexities of the financial crisis we're facing. Enjoy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DavidDvorkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
5. Sometimes a slip of the tongue is just a slip of the tongue
As Freud might have said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diogenes2 Donating Member (344 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
6. I didn't hear it, but I still go...
with "suspicious".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
livelongandprosper Donating Member (417 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-26-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. Don't read too much into this. Bush actually believes
suspic is a word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC