|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Newsjock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-28-08 08:52 PM Original message |
Poll question: Pure and simple: Do you support the proposed bailout? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpgray (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-28-08 08:55 PM Response to Original message |
1. I don't feel I understand the issue well enough, despite trying for several days |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blonndee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-28-08 08:57 PM Response to Original message |
2. I don't know. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RoyGBiv (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-28-08 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
3. Yes ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-28-08 09:13 PM Response to Original message |
4. Kick (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lostnotforgotten (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-28-08 09:15 PM Response to Original message |
5. No - See A Rational Plan From Thom Hartmann |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
neverforget (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-28-08 09:16 PM Response to Original message |
6. No. This will not be the only bailout as we are just at the beginning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
New Dawn (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-28-08 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
7. No bailouts for billionaires. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MercutioATC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-28-08 09:27 PM Response to Original message |
8. No, but for a different reason than most. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-28-08 09:29 PM Response to Original message |
9. No. There are alternatives. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jonnyblitz (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-28-08 09:34 PM Response to Original message |
10. NO. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Booster (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-28-08 09:38 PM Response to Original message |
11. With this bailout I guess we get a lot of homes that have been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-28-08 10:33 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. No, we DON'T get any homes. We just get a "promise" that we might get paid back someday, if the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FreakinDJ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-28-08 09:50 PM Response to Original message |
12. Repeatedly Bailing Out our economy means its Structuraly Flawed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Annoyinglysmart (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-28-08 10:05 PM Response to Original message |
13. I'm not convinced it was needed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Sep-28-08 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
14. Another kick. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
scarletwoman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 01:34 AM Response to Original message |
16. Kicking again for a bigger sample. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tama (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 04:35 AM Response to Reply #16 |
17. so far |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThePowerofWill (462 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 06:47 AM Response to Original message |
18. No. /nt/ |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Newsjock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 08:53 AM Response to Original message |
19. Kick for the morning crowd |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bdamomma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 08:58 AM Response to Original message |
20. the whole plan sounds very risky to me. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bean fidhleir (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Sep-29-08 09:05 AM Response to Original message |
21. No. We should protect the innocent from harm (those who were forced to take the risks without |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 06:11 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC