Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RNC strategery re communications secrecy...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 08:06 PM
Original message
RNC strategery re communications secrecy...
Edited on Wed Mar-14-07 08:27 PM by hootinholler
The executive branch was doing it with Abramoff, and now we find out that at least the DOJ was doing it too!

WTF am I talking about? The pattern of using RNC registered or other private email servers thereby keeping the traffic out of the white house or other government email systems, on which the email would be logged and part of official record.

This is despicable and evidence of a conspiracy to subvert open government.

I think it sa the RNC who provided blackberry service to staffers to communicate with old Jack's staff, and now ere the gwb43.com emails.

The thing is, these emails by definition are not privledged documents in any way. No executive privledge exists. The traffic should be subpeonaed immediately!

-Hoot

edit to fix title, you'll have to see it on the greatest page to see how stupid it was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. Is there proof of this? and is there a record of the emails that can be forced out?
I believe thay are this corrupt, I just want them caught and prosecuted.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes there is
The docs that were released yesterday show that the extension after the @ in some of the emails was gwb43.com instead of a dot gov addy. Yep, taking more and more of it off the server.

Makes you wonder just what they say when they stay to those addy's and use their blackberry instead of a WH server, doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I so want these corrupt cretins OUT of my government... Please.....
I am so sick of * and his misadministration TOTALLY blowing past every "lowest point possible" only to find yet another LOW....

there is no emoticon that can adequately express my nausea over the depths to which that bush has dragged my once great country....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 08:25 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I think someone should find out!
Real crimes were committed here, at least obstruction and then there's the extortion.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 08:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. But wait, there's more
According to Talking Points Memo the repubes seem to be using coded language in these emails to disguise the actual meaning of what they are saying. They've apparently developed their very own criminal argot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Can you spell RICO?
I can. All the elements for a RICO conviction exist, this is just more pudding for the poof.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. We don't need more subpoenas
We need arrest warrants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. We need a freakin prosecutor!
How about we take the 8 USAs and form a comittee of prosecutors. Lam can chair it.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. Sons a bitches!
My hair on the back of my neck is raised! Spit'n mad!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I hear ya brother
We need to get the word out. It was a real DUH moment when it occurred to me and I haven't seen this meme out there.

Seems kinda important to me. I hope that democrats aren't doing it too.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Why would dems do this? They are not into a secret government.
I'm with you though, they BETTER not be doing this!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Consider the DLC
If any democtatic staff or officias are doing this, it would be one of that bunch.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
13. bedtime kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Lunch kick, cause it seems important to me. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC