Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Current draft

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 12:44 AM
Original message
Current draft
Edited on Wed Oct-01-08 01:24 AM by nadinbrzezinski
this is from the summary, easier to understand, and these are the GIFTS to the RIGHT

Section 132. Authority to Suspend Mark-to-Market Accounting.
Restates the Securities and Exchange Commission’s authority to suspend the application
of Statement Number 157 of the Financial Accounting Standards Board if the SEC
determines that it is in the public interest and protects investors.
Section 133. Study on Mark-to-Market Accounting.
Requires the SEC, in consultation with the Federal Reserve and the Treasury, to conduct
a study on mark-to-market accounting standards as provided in FAS 157, including its
effects on balance sheets, impact on the quality of financial information, and other
matters, and to report to Congress within 90 days on its findings.

From WIKI

In accounting, mark to market is the act of assigning a value to a position held in a financial instrument based on the current market price for the instrument or similar instruments. For example, the final value of a futures contract that expires in 9 months will not be known until it expires. If it is marked to market, for accounting purposes it is assigned the value that it would fetch in the open market currently.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_to_market


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hah - best typo EVAH!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. I agree that most shit that the RW wants is completely daft
Edited on Wed Oct-01-08 12:59 AM by kenny blankenship
but that's the penalty for not passing it the first time. They hold the country hostage and demand some sort of genuflection to their discredited ideology. Asking for reviews of the valuation model is not crazy but trying to jam deregulation and tax cuts into this bill is completely daft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl gone mad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
3. It's completely daft.
Finally we can agree on something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC