Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We'll FIX IT LATER !?!?!?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:24 PM
Original message
We'll FIX IT LATER !?!?!?
Would you buy a $700 Billion dollar used car from these people?


Didn't they promise that the Iraq War would be paid for by the sale of Iraqi Oil?
I don't recall a single mention of paying back the taxpayers when that Oil Companies were given no bid contracts for Iraqi Oil.

Didn't they say that there were protections written into the Authorization to Use Force in Iraq?
I don't remember them holding Bush accountable when these "protections" were laughed at.
I don't remember anyone saying anything at all.

Didn't they say that there were problems with The Patriot Act, but we NEEDED a bill immediately, and they would go back and FIX IT later?
No body went back and fixed it later.


Now they are saying "Give us $700Billion of your children's money to throw at Wall Street, and we'll fix it later?

We certainly need to do something, but this problem didn't magically occur suddenly last Friday night.
No one can say "Who could have foreseen this?"
The alarms have been ringing for years while our Representatives sailed Merrily along playing the Great Ponzie Scam and making profits.
NOW, they demand an emergency immediate BailOut that does NOTHING to fix the system that caused it.

Forgive me if I'm having trouble trusting you.

Fix the boat before trying to bail it out, or you're wasting your time and our children's money!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't want this Congress to try to fix anything
including a parking ticket. They'd screw it up totally.

I do want them to pass a small portion of the bailout, just enough to keep the banks solvent until January.

By then, we should have a better Congress and the Democrats will have had a couple of months to sit back and plan what they need to do to fix this collapsing GOP economy.

You know, like obliterate Reaganism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SnoopDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. I was just thinking about this same issue...
If this 'bailout' bill does not prevent what caused this 'crisis', it will be a never ending cash flow for these crooks...

And, what about the people who let all these bad mortgages originate? Where are our Democratic hearing going after those who CAUSED these bad mortgages?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. BushCo is saying, "Hurry up, trust us!" and blaming minorities AGAIN.
Pelosi and Reid are right behind them. AGAIN.

What, me worry? :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Today it is the Senate playing "Trust Us".
The $700Billion dollar spending bill originating in the Senate (?!?!) today is being ram-rodded by Senator Schumer (Dem, Wall Street).

I couldn't find a good picture of him, so I went with Pelosi, Reid, and their good friend Paulson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Of course -- who else? Schumer, Dodd. Biden would be right there
with them and so would Obama but they have another gig.

We don't own this country, we just pay for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #12
34. All of whom have received a gazillion dollars from the banks and financial services industry,
but I am sure there is no connection between the two.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #34
36. Until we have publicly funded elections . . .
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. I have been waiting for that all my adult life.
It doesn't seem like it will ever happen.

America will not be free until we have publicly funded elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jflood1016 Donating Member (39 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. The bailout is a necessary evil.
We must open up the credit markets, so the economy doesn't collapse. It is huge amount of money, but the negative consequences of inaction will be far greater.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. The BAILOUT didn't work in 31 and it won't work now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rockymountaindem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
53. What bailout in 1931?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. "the negative consequences of inaction will be far greater"
And you know this HOW?

By listening to the same people who caused the problem or profited from it?

Will giving $700BIllion to Wall Street solve the problem, or will we be spending MORE Billions of our children's money in a couple of months?

This has ALL the signs of another quick Smash & Grab that will enrich a few, and cause deep problems for the people who actually have to pay the bill.

I agree. There is a SERIOUS problem in America. It has been festering since Reagan was president.
$700Billion may prop up the old system for a few weeks, but does nothing to solve the problem....and our children get to pay the $700Billion bill.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jflood1016 Donating Member (39 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. The Bush propsal was terrible.
However, the net result was a kick in the pants to Congress to get them to act. They were to afraid to do anything for fear of loosing a stupid election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
31. The Fed could do that at any time, the authority already exists.
This corporate welfare scare is to protect investor (campaign contributors) assets and has nothing to do with the economy.

Same as it ever was.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #31
48. Thanks for pointing that out so I didn't have to again
Edited on Wed Oct-01-08 05:08 PM by Hydra
All of the screamers have forgotten/don't know that the Fed can lend at 0% in a true crisis to prevent a liquidity freeze.

All of this hysteria is Wall St. holding a gun to our head and saying "Give us some more."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #48
54. YW. Have you noticed that whenever this is pointed out they never answer? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
33. NO! ... and welcome to DU. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fla nocount Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 08:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
62. Are you drinking the red one or the blue one, sweetened or non? n/t
Edited on Thu Oct-02-08 08:21 AM by fla nocount
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContinentalOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. This whole thing is insane. If this bailout passes, I predict that in a couple of years...
some of the same DUers who are in favor of it now will be back, railing against it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. They will be back by Jan 09 saying WTF
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContinentalOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
25. Yeah, and they'll be pretending like it's Obama's fault and like they never supported it. -nt-
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. Indeed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #25
35. I've bookmarked most of the bailout supporters I've seen. =) n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #35
49. Can I borrow your list later?
They'll still lie about it(They always do), but the newbies won't be taken in when they say they were always against this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Fix the boat before trying to bail it out."
A true voice of sanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. Basically, you abd other want to sink the boat
with everyone on it because of your disdain for "fat cats" has blinded you to the fact (ofr perhaps caring about the fact) that you and tens of millions of others will be hurting much more than they will if we don't act deciively now- rather than 6-10 months later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. That's a false dilemma. We can act decisively AND responsibly
and soon, if not NOW. Giving the crook at Treasury more or less of a blank check with no plan is not responsible unless you trust him?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. It's not a blank check
and there's oversight.

James Galbraith opposed the initial Paulson plan, but like Krugman, is on boad with this one- with of course, reservations and suggestions- which many of us have.

How Much Will It Cost and Will It Come Soon Enough?

Could the current bailout bill have been better? Yes


There is no question that the current bailout bill represents an enormous improvement over the original Treasury proposal. Unlike the original proposal, this bill protects the public interest with requirements for disclosure and audit, for reporting to Congress both on procedures and results, and with protections against arbitrage, conflict of interest, and fraud, with provisions requiring the secretary of the treasury to try to minimize foreclosures, to acquire warrants, and with limitations on executive compensation, especially golden parachutes.

More: http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=how_much_will_it_cost_and_will_it_come_soon_enough

Bottom line: there's a reason why Obama is supporting this, even though its not popularly recieved by the base- and he gave those reasons to us in Reno yesterday.

I'm on board ith his- because he understands what's driving some people to ignore the consequences of failing to get this passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. Obama supported the first one and didn't want bankruptcy protections in it.
Edited on Wed Oct-01-08 03:11 PM by sfexpat2000
He's running for office and he's no measure of what is good for us right now.

An enormous improvement over a POS is still too close to a POS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 07:57 AM
Response to Reply #20
59. they all have their reasons for voting against our wishes.
what else is new? obama had reasons for his fisa vote, but it was still a bad vote. perhaps the difference here is you trust obama, pelosi, reid, bush, and cheney, and i don't. fuck "reservations". fix it right, now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Basically Bush wants to bankrupt Obama.
A little time for planning AND fixing would have gone a long way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #14
24. I guess that's not how Obama sees it
not acting may may well bankrupt many posters on these threads. No question that if credit markets aren't restored, there are going to be major business failures and double digit unemployment.

No one like fat cats- and they'll be called into account- as Obama has said. Right now, what we need to do is take care of main street.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Obama's major source of funding is.....WALL STREET.

Financial industry big houses have contributed almost twice in funds to Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama in comparison to his Republican rival John McCain.

For both candidates, Wall Street's investment and banking sectors have become among their portliest cash cows...

"No matter who wins in November, Wall Street will have a friend in the White House," said Massie Ritsch of the Center for Responsive Politics, which crunched the data for The Daily News.

http://www.newstrackindia.com/newsdetails/4517




Barack Obama rakes in millions from law firms serving the interests of Wall Street, including the financial institutions that gave us the subprime lending crisis.

http://www.blackagendareport.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=613&Itemid=1


Sorry if I feel Obama may be slightly biased in his support of the BailOut.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #28
32. So Obama's in Wall Streets's pockets- and doesn't care about main street?
LOL.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #28
37. Yep. They all belong to someone, though.
It's not like Obama is some kind of anomaly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jonnyblitz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #28
42. yup, Obama has received almost DOUBLE what McCain has
from his Wall Street benefactors. I have seen this brought up elsewhere over the past week, Democracy Now, or somewhere actually left wing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #42
45. Which is giving a lot of us some extreme cognitive dissonance..
Edited on Wed Oct-01-08 04:29 PM by chill_wind
the Wall Street money part.... but McCain loves the Pentagon, war and the Bush Junta business as usual and he takes his share of corporate/special interests billions from everybody--

A McCain/Palin admin and Supreme Court is too totally grim to even think about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PsN2Wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
15. Going back further
Environmental and labor concerns would be addressed after NAFTA was passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #15
26. That's a good one.
They were going to fix NAFTA later.
I can still see their smiling faces as they reassured us that LABOR and Environmental concers would ALL be adressed, but we need to pass NAFTA NOW.

Never happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
16. Agree K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
17. they cannot be trusted
i'm with you. i don't trust them at all. i'm at work but i have Cspan on and it seems that they're just getting up one after the other and spinning shit. i don't know what this latest version of the bill looks like. i don't even know where to find out. but what i bet is, once i see it, i will see that STILL paulson has absolute power over a tremendous amount of taxpayer money, more than one person should ever be able to control. so i'll keep calling and writing as long as it's not decided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spike from MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
18. They also said the same thing about the
Military Commissions Act. That passed in Sept. of 2006. Good thing the Dems went right in and fixed that after they took the majority in both houses. Oh wait...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yy4me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
19. It is our money, I want paper to back up my portion. Something
like SHARES to be cashed in on some future date. Something that makes these idiots do the job right because it will have to be paid pack without excuses. It may take a while but I'll leave them to my grandchildren when I re-do my will. One way or the other, payback has to come and I'm sick of just paying out with no accountability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2speak Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
21. But the engine is knocking
that's OK well put a tankful in for you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
23. Reid looks like someone just beat the shit out of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #23
39. His job is likely shortening his life.
Edited on Wed Oct-01-08 03:49 PM by sfexpat2000
Did you see him on CSPAN or?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. IMO.... this bailout is "The Bush Doctrine" of Preemption.
there are many other options being presented...step back...take a breath...don't panic...we can fix it if level heads prevail....without giving away the farm..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. My family business is losing money every day this goes on
and I agree with you. We can do better than this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happydreams Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #39
57. I've never thought he was alive anyway.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
43. They were going to fix the Patriot Act too, and the Military Commission Act...
And everything else. But the repubes won't let it come up for a vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brentspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
44. Isn't that what they said about FISA?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 04:24 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. Anyone who has ever been hurried by the Torture President
needs to wake the f up. Anyone who has ever witnessed the Democrats going along with him needs to be kicked in the remote.

Something does need to be done. But we hurry at our own peril. And I don't give a damn what Obama says. He's a candidate, not yet the Pope last time I heard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #46
50. Yes! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #46
60. double yes.
besides, i don't much care what the pope says, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
47. It will pay for itself!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 07:59 AM
Response to Reply #47
61. whew, that's a relief to hear! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
51. Yup...
I just can't even think about it anymore. Too depressing. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
52. Mighty Big Pearls Hanging around Nancy's Neck
I wonder who paid for it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fla nocount Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #52
63. Mr. Pelosi's partner, T. Boone Pickens. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
carlyhippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
55. yep, they will fix it later with all our social security and our kids and their kids too
get ready to work until the day you die, folks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blues90 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-01-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
56. You're right . I also see one more visual think that burns me
Not one of those faces in that photo along with many others have far more money than they need and have nothing to lose when everything falls apart.

It's easy for them to stand there with their games but not for many , many others. They have done nothing and only care about their political career positions.

Freaky how suddenly here we are with the Iraq occupation all forgotten and the death and robbery and illegal war all for gotten.

All the focus is shifted like magic onto the economy meltdown when it existed all along and we sit here looking at the elections too.

Nothing else seems to matter. The car ad's and all the consumer crap ad's continue to run along as if NOTHING at all matters and nothing at all has changed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tomp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
58. you believed a politician?!?!
wow, are you naive. you must be thinking in the old god guy/bad guy paradigm. try bad guy/slightly, slightly, slightly less bad guy. you won't feel any better, but you'll be right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:29 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC