Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Secret Service must hand over Abramoff logs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 01:25 PM
Original message
Secret Service must hand over Abramoff logs
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/secret-service-must-hand-over-abramoff-logs-2008-10-02.html

Secret Service must hand over Abramoff logs
By Susan Crabtree
Posted: 10/02/08 01:24 PM


The Secret Service has 18 days to hand over White House visitor logs detailing disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff’s visits, according to Judicial Watch, a public interest legal group.

Judicial Watch on Thursday announced that the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia earlier in the week ruled against the Secret Service motion to dismiss the group’s open-records requests. The court’s Tuesday decision ordered the agency to finish processing the requests and provide all non-exempt records within 20 days of the court order.

The court ruled that the Secret Service violated the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by not thoroughly searching White House visitor records that could contain information about Abramoff’s visits. The Secret Service had argued that these additional visitor records, called “Sensitive Security Records,” were so secret that the agency could neither confirm nor deny their existence.

It has been three years since Judicial Watch filed a FOIA request with the Secret Service seeking all White House visitor logs from Jan. 1, 2001, to the present time. After the Secret Service failed to respond, Judicial Watch filed lawsuits on Feb. 22, 2006, and April 25, 2006. The Secret Service’s response to a previous court order was incomplete, so Judicial Watch continued to press its legal case.

"The court has obviously had enough of the gamesmanship by the Secret Service," Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a statement. "We're very pleased with the court's ruling. This is a tremendous victory for transparency in government. In this case, we hope the Bush administration stops trying to evade FOIA law."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Tee hee!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Someone needs to ask McTroll about Abramoff. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yep. He's skirted that topic nicely, hasn't he. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Yep. 'Jack Abramoff: John McCain’s other Lobbyist problem'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. If the Obama campaign is serious about the "four more years" idea
this is the fastest way to get there. No degrees of separation between McBomb, Rove, Abramoff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John7714 Donating Member (26 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. That Strange Odd - QUEER - (That's the word) Jeff Gannon's logs should be made available also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Huh? What does his sexuality have to do with wh logs? That's right, nothing. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L. Coyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
8. Judge orders more searches for Abramoff visits
Judge orders more searches for Abramoff visits
2 hours ago - http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jqNPqvQT05DQyiW1KlCSU0XQpPBgD93IGEDO0


WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge has rejected the Bush administration's attempt to shield records that may shed light on the White House visits of now imprisoned lobbyist Jack Abramoff.

In several orders this week, U.S. District Judge Royce C. Lamberth sided with watchdog groups Judicial Watch and Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics, which are suing the Secret Service and Department of Homeland Security for access to the logs.

The administration in 2006 agreed to produce all responsive records about the visits "without redactions or claims of exemption." But it soon argued that the contents of certain "Sensitive Security Records," which are created in the course of conducting more extensive background checks on particular White House visitors, cannot be publicly revealed even though they could show some of Abramoff's visits.

Lamberth disagreed this week, saying those security records are not exempt under the federal Freedom of Information Act on the grounds that the information could promote criminal activity. ............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. K&R
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-02-08 09:43 PM
Response to Original message
10. It's a good start.
What do we have to do to get the logs for the Cheney Energy meetings?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC