Understanding the mentality of 'conservatives'.

I recently purchased John W. Dean's book called "Conservatives Without Conscience", and it is a must read for understanding why repigs, who call themselves 'conservatives' are actually not conservative at all. Right now, on Amazon, the book is at a very affordable price and I recommend it.
http://www.amazon.com/Conservatives-Without-Conscience-John-Dean/dp/B0013LTF2Y/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1223257297&sr=1-1

From Amazon.com
"In his seventh book, Dean, the former Nixon legal counsel whom the FBI has called the "master manipulator" of the Watergate coverup, weighs in with a rebuke to Christian fundamentalists and other right-wing hard-liners. A self-described Goldwater conservative (indeed, Goldwater had planned to collaborate on this book before his death), he rails against the influence of social conservatives and neoconservatives within his party.

Suffused with bitterness stemming from the controversies in which he has been embroiled, Dean's book paints a thin social science veneer over a litany of mostly ad hominem complaints. Purporting to show that social conservatives and neoconservatives are, on the whole, demonstrably authoritarian, bigoted, irrational and amoral, Conservatives Without Conscience offers helpful hints such as "Conservatives without conscience do not have horns and tails," and evinces a telling fascination with politicians' shady book deals.

Though there is clearly much to condemn in the policies and tactics Dean deplores, assailing everyone from French political theorist Joseph de Maistre to Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist to the chairman of Yale University's conservative association as "Double High" social- dominance-oriented authoritarians undermines his journalistic credibility. Dean's lurid accusations may be entertaining, but they add little to the reasoned debate that Washington so sorely lacks today. (July 11)"

the review that criticizes him is the standard form that they use with such phrases as;
"Suffused with bitterness, paints a thin social science veneer, ad hominem complaints, undermines his journalistic credibility," And of course the even present.... "add little to the reasoned debate."

They are like trying to tell an alcoholic that they are in fact, an alcoholic.

They are not 'conservatives', they are Social Dominist and Right-Wing Authoritarians.

Like Dean and Erlicman.
The story of Erlicman that I heard was that he went to prison and they put him in a federal prison with mostly Mexican immigrants and he wrote a book about it.
It was his really first encounter with the normal world and it made him think.