Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It's Official !!! California moves its Primary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
OHdem10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 12:58 PM
Original message
It's Official !!! California moves its Primary
up to Feb 5 2008. Arnold Schwarzenegger just officially
announced. This can mean Primaries are over and
our Candidate is known on Super Tuesday, Feb 5.

According to B Schneider, other large states
are considering the same action--NJ NY Fla
to name a few. As more states with large numbers
of delegates join the change--it becomes a National
Primary and each party's candidate is selected.

Addvantages---Larger States are given opportunity
to participate more actively in deciding who
our Candidate is.

Disadvantage depending on your opinion. Limits
Candidates. Only candidates with large amts of
Cash can particpate. 2ond and lower tier
candidates had just as well drop out. If there
is anyone considering entering and has money, money
money, they had better get in soon or it will be too
late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, reach deep and fund your choice because the candidate
with the money is going to buy the lion's share of the on-air time.

I hate it when we're manipulated by the monied forces rather than ideas within our own party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. I hate it when the monied forces become the ideas within our own party... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Yeah, that too.
:yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Adelante Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. So much for democracy
"Only candidates with large amts of
Cash can particpate. 2ond and lower tier
candidates had just as well drop out."

:(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
21. Welcome to the New, Improved Plutocracy!
If you thought it was bad before, well it's ALL about money now. This plays right into the hands of corporatists and plutocrats, the ruthless and the supergreedy. Yuk!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. this is not a good thing,
especially if other large states follow suite. This effectively knocks all the 2nd tier candidates out of the race - they just won't have the money to compete in the large media markets of states like California.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninja Jordan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 01:02 PM
Original message
Will Obama's California popularity lead him to victory?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. Money is going to kill our Democracy and any sense of fairness.
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaksavage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Too late
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hmmm...do we really want the people in the state who put Ahnold
in the Governor's mansion to decide who our candidates are going to be from this point forward?

Not so sure that's a great thing for the rest of America.

I want elections to become publicly funded. We need to get rid of these big bucks candidates who have their hands in thousands of special interest and lobbyist pockets.

We need people in office who AREN'T POLITICIANS. And the only way that's ever going to happen is to give the little guy with no money a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. Kansas just announced the results of their primary: Brownback won!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sapere aude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. Another disadvantage. We will not see lower tier candidates in debates and we will not
hear their ideas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
9. Good.
The problem with the drawn-out primary season is it does a lot of the Repukes' work for them,

After six months of mud, the R's already know how to go after our candidate.

I don't see the money thing as a disadvantage, because in the 2004 system we lost most of our candidates due to lack of funds. Running for president is expensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikelgb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. I like this.
I think the second tiers can have a chance IF they can dump all of their money in our basket... the delegates from our state could be enought to propel a strong finish in the later primaries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. What later primaries?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
matcom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Great. Now they are running for President of California
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
15. On the bright side. Better West Coast liberals tnan red state moderates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninja Jordan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. I don't really see that as a bright side.
More overtly liberal candidates are likelier to get hammered in a general election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I am so sick of Calif being the ATM
then have nothing to do with the nominations, or rather , less to do with them than say, SC., and other red states like IA. C'mon NY.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leopolds Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 03:29 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. ATM, huh? You feel you deserve political influence by virtue of money your wealthy neighbors spent.
Pot, meet kettle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. No . Population, amount of Dems
Let them spend some of the money here , Let them kiss some Calif ass for a change. We deserve the infuence as much as New Hampshire. Let them compete for the liberal vote. More people more votes more money So?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quinnox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
19. Finally
A western state will actually have influence on the candidate chosen? Amazing! They finally recognized there are plenty of Americans who live in the Western United States, not just the East. More progressive too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
22. So which candidate will promise to work to make it a federal crime
to post Grammy spoilers on the Internets? That could win over a lot of west coast voters, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC