Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would a check for $1/4 million keep you from going postal?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Philosoraptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 06:18 AM
Original message
Would a check for $1/4 million keep you from going postal?
I just heard a cspan caller suggest a great idea, he said the crooks in our government should give us all a check, (I came up with the amount), and 'then maybe that'd keep us from going postal on them'.

I think this is a very sound idea, they don't really want us making a big mess in the streets instead of Xmas shopping, and it'd be a hell of a lot cheaper than a 700 billion dollar bailout.

Whaddaya think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 06:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh Hell No
A check for every single taxpayer to the tune of a quarter million dollars? Are you nuts? We don't have the money, and if people start getting checks like that, it means it's time to get out your wheelbarrows, 'cause they've turned the presses on and aren't turning them off anytime soon. Hyperinflation is not where we need to go.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
2. Inflation City
I've heard this argument used before...and the rebuttal is that when you flood so much money into so many hands, you risk cheapening the currency. Just think of how our "living wage" has moved up over the years, but the quality of life hasn't. 20 years ago, 30k was decent money...today we're seeing people claim they can't cut it on 100k. It's all relative.

Also, a lot of credit is "funny money"...dollars one never will hold in their hands but figures thrown around to keep the wheels of the market or business going. The money only matters when its withdrawn from circulation or the market...when credit gets tight and people go to the sidelines. A one-time check, no matter how big, won't get that money in the commercial system that generates the real wealth.

Personally, I'll gladly take 250k...where do I sign???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PetrusMonsFormicarum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
3. Actual amount much less
I believe I read that the bailout divided among every American citizen works out to around $6000 apiece. Probably wouldn't make that much difference to most.

But I do want to see some dividend checks from the stock in banks that we all now own. And if not:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Believing Is Art Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
4. A quarter mil to everyone would not be cheaper than 700bil
Assuming the credit markets don't fail without some intervention from the govt, thus us actually being able to cash hypothetical checks, the resulting inflation would put us on Zimbabwe's unfortunate path.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
5. The caller is confusing 250,000 with 2500.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProdigalJunkMail Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
6. cheaper? i think not...
how many times is this math going to have to be done on this board?

$250,000 * 150,000,000 (VERY rough estimate for working adults...probably low) = $37,500,000,000,000 (that's $37.5Trillion)

I expect better from you...even at this early hour :-)

sP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Oct-15-08 07:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. If the Repukes were so concerned about the homeowners, then
why don't they let the banks fail, and let the borrowers who were going to lose their homes have their debt forgiven?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC