Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Ted-AK) Stevens Ready To Take Stand in His Own Defense

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-08 08:23 AM
Original message
(Ted-AK) Stevens Ready To Take Stand in His Own Defense
Stevens Ready To Take Stand in His Own Defense
By Kathleen Hunter, CQ Staff


Sen. Ted Stevens is poised to take the stand to dispute — in his own words — charges that he knowingly concealed more than $250,000 worth of gifts that should have been disclosed over a period of seven years on financial disclosure forms that all senators must complete annually.

Stevens, an icon in Alaska politics who is the Senate’s longest-serving Republican, has insisted since his July 29 indictment that he is innocent of any wrongdoing. The senator, who allegedly accepted unreported gifts from former VECO Corp. chief executive Bill Allen and others, is the first sitting senator in 27 years to stand trial in federal court.

Prosecutors contend that VECO covered many of the costs associated with a 2000-01 renovation to Stevens’ Girdwood, Alaska home — as well as other home improvements that constitute much of the amount Stevens is accused of concealing.

The 84 year-old lawmaker, who once proclaimed himself to be “a mean, miserable SOB,” is known to have a combative and often gruff personality, but also can be charming and controlled when necessary, abilities that could influence how the jury views his testimony.

U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan has said jurors likely are to begin their deliberations early next week. Stevens wants to clear his name before Election Day, when he faces an uphill battle against Anchorage Major Mark Begich in his bid for a seventh full term.

more...

http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?parm1=5&docID=news-000002975201
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Oct-16-08 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. Federal court. no cameras. damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC