Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CNN is promoting their coverage of another vote recount.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 12:55 PM
Original message
CNN is promoting their coverage of another vote recount.
Edited on Sun Oct-19-08 01:20 PM by Texas Explorer
Seems as if CNN is preparing itself for covering another fiasco of the type seen in 2000. I guess they know something we don't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. So am I.
I don't believe for one minute that this election will not be stolen.

Notice we're not hearing the name "Diebold" at all? That makes me very nervous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gore1FL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. 1999?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. You're right. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 01:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. How do you recount a registration?
This is bs and yeah, they're signalling something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. No recount, at first.
I'm guessing a concerted effort AT THE POLLING STATIONS to challenge individual voters' registrations. In some states, a winning challenge either knocks the voter out or pushes the challenged voter onto a paper provisional ballot.

Each absentee ballot will face huge challenges as well if they are counted, and they are more likely to be counted if there are fewer regular votes tallied because of a winning challenge to voter registrations.

Once all voter registration and absentee ballot challenges are dealt with, then there could be a recount if the tally is sufficiently close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The overall plan is to suppress the vote, not each individual ballot.
If you tie up a precinct with a challenge, five people go home.

Imho, they'll zero in on one or two states and the games will follow there. Likely Ohio and another one that has a Republican Sec of State -- like CO or MI. PA or WV are also good candidates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 02:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Perhaps.
Ohio has a dem as sec of state now, I believe. There was a general house cleaning there in 2006 after the 2004 debacle.

Michigan is a possibility. The Republicans there include a huge, religious conservative bloc from the western side of the state fueled by money from the founders of Scamway (also known as Amway) to hire all kinds of help.

The question is whether any Republicans will venture into precincts in Detroit and some of the other half-dead industrial cities to challenge registrations. I don't think that the Republicans have anyone but Prince's Blackwater (Prince's sister is married to a scamway heir), and I think that they're tied up elsewhere.

Florida might be a better candidate than Ohio. More Republicans in office and a history of vote suppression.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Yes, OH has a great Dem. But MI and CO are RIPE for the picking.
Florida may not be a good pick this time because the public will rebel immediately.

There has been a lot of vote suppression activity in PA. We'll have to watch carefully over the next two weeks. :(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I still think Florida.
It's a much better set-up for funny business. In fact the system was set up to facilitate funny business. I don't think that the Pubbies will care if folks are up in arms, perhaps literally, if they think that they can keep Obama out.

I'm not kidding about the fear that suburbanites have of going into inner city areas in Michigan to challenge for McCain. I'm from the state, and I simply can't see it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. Ohio, certainly - then
Virginia or Pennsylvania which ever has the bigger electoral package.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. MI had machine "problems" the night of the primary that went unreported
except by KO. They have a Republican Sec of State who is a snake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. I can see voting machine shenanigans in MI before I can see
McCain supporters in polling places in Dem areas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #13
14.  I think you're right about that. They'd never go into a situation
they aren't sure they can control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. That's true. They are a bunch of control freaks.
And I don't think that they can control Kalamazoo, let alone Detroit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amandabeech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Oct-19-08 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. The attack on ACORN is the predicate to Republican challenges during the voting process
and once the ballots have been counted.

People here at DU expect a landslide victory for Obama over Mc Lame/caribou barbie. However, my recollection is that in recent elections, the polls start to tighten toward the end.

On Thursday, Drudge (I know, I know) showed a poll, Gallup, I think (I'm beat) that had McLame only down by 2. It's probably an outlier, but still you have to be careful.

It is possible that a couple of traditional battleground states could be extremely tight, and that every vote there will be scrutinized very carefully.

Of course, who knows what will happen with the economy between now and election day, and I think that it will be "the economy stupid" that will tip this election.

I'm hoping, however, that Obama wins in a landslide of both the popular and electoral college votes. This is the most tense election that I remember, and I started following things before '68. In '68, people talked more about the election and there was less "in your face" among ordinary people. This time, people stopped talking back in February or March. Holding things in can result in bad explosions later on. I really do not want to see any spasms of violence from either side here. It's the last thing that the country needs. From my vantage point, however, I can't rule something like that out, and believe me, I wish that I could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC