Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

LAPD neglects rape cases (7,217 and counting)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 05:00 PM
Original message
LAPD neglects rape cases (7,217 and counting)
http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/?last_story=/mwt/broadsheet/2008/10/21/rape_kits/


Tuesday, Oct. 21, 2008 12:40 PDT
LAPD neglects rape cases

A woman submits to an invasive DNA test after being raped. The very last thing she wants to do after the attack is to have nearly every orifice swabbed and her insides probed in a pelvic exam -- but, hell, she'll do anything to catch her attacker. Now, picture her rape kit sitting on a shelf in the city's forensics lab. For several years, as her attacker roams free, the kit remains there, untouched and untested, until the case is no longer prosecutable.

That story is all too common, according to the Los Angeles Times. A city audit found that Los Angeles police officials failed to test DNA kits for 217 sexual assault cases within the legal time limit for prosecution. The statute of limitations is 10 years. That's right: 217 rape kits were left untested for more than a decade.

What's more, the audit found that the city has a current backlog of 7,000 untested kits, and has failed to notify victims if their evidence kits are not tested within two years, as required by state law. City controller Laura Chick, whose office led the audit, said: "It is beyond disturbing that the thousands of victims who have undergone the invasive ordeal of {submitting to} these tests do not even know that their evidence is still untested."

The LAPD acknowledges the lapse, but suggests "that some of those cases had been prosecuted using other evidence," according to the Times. Yeah, pssh, who needs DNA evidence for a rape conviction?

Thankfully, the Times balances its journalistic take-down with an editorial attack. It points out that Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and police chief William J. Bratton have focused on beefing up the police presence on the streets, without reasonably strengthening the investigatory infrastructure. In other words: "Inattention to rape evidence may be undermining the whole point of a larger department.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's because they're out frisking minorities more than white people
Even though they find drugs and other contraband on white people more.

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-aclu21-2008oct21,0,4850652.story
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. "Ya step out for a donut...
and the next thing ya know, 10 years have flown by...."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Oct-21-08 05:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. They seem to have plenty of money available for their fancy helicopters,
and nice new police cars, and nice new multimillion-dollar police stations and such. But no money for a couple of lab techs to run DNA samples on rape cases.

I liked Bratton up until now. I am gonna have to rethink my opinion of him considerably.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 02:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC