|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Newsjock (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 10:32 PM Original message |
Reporter detained, interrogated at debate for 'volatile Wi-Fi signals' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 10:35 PM Response to Original message |
1. "Volatile wi-fi signals" = subversive emails. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HillbillyBob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-24-08 06:26 AM Response to Reply #1 |
11. I represent that remark, I have no problem with proper authority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
justaregularperson (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-24-08 11:37 PM Response to Reply #11 |
21. "Proper authority" would be IT and isolating the laptop, not secret service grilling? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kansasblue (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 10:38 PM Response to Original message |
2. I wonder if it's related to communication to the debaters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leveymg (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-24-08 03:45 AM Response to Reply #2 |
10. That was my first thought, too. Or, it was interfering with Sec Svc communications |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Eric J in MN (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 10:40 PM Response to Original message |
3. Never heard of anything like this before. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 10:43 PM Response to Original message |
4. Absolutely fucking insane! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Canuckistanian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
5. Well that's a new one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 10:55 PM Response to Original message |
6. Secret Service are some of the most stupidest people employed!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TygrBright (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 11:44 PM Response to Reply #6 |
8. uh, no. They're not. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Shanti Mama (625 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-24-08 07:16 AM Response to Reply #8 |
13. Bravo! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-24-08 04:30 PM Response to Reply #8 |
18. They fucking better be! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalFighter (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-24-08 04:45 PM Response to Reply #8 |
19. Then explain their action against the reporter!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dgibby (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Oct-23-08 11:21 PM Response to Original message |
7. Who was the original IT guy and why would anybody let a stranger tinker with his computer? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindPilot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-24-08 07:41 AM Response to Reply #7 |
15. Most likely the IT guy would just confirm the IP and MAC addresses |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-24-08 12:08 AM Response to Original message |
9. worrisome. i'm running it by my i.s. friend. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MindPilot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-24-08 07:00 AM Response to Original message |
12. In the IT world "volatile" usually refers to something easily changed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-24-08 07:33 AM Response to Original message |
14. There is nothing at all that "tinkering' could have done to produce RF signals |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no limit (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-24-08 12:20 PM Response to Original message |
16. Umm...if your lap top is a security threat then they had a right to do what they did |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
justaregularperson (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-24-08 11:33 PM Response to Reply #16 |
20. Excuse me... I challenge that thought. How is this a "security threat" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
justaregularperson (153 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-24-08 11:52 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Kick |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mike_c (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Oct-24-08 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
17. self delete.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 03:25 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC