Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The dumbest thing a voting-machine maker ever did

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 12:50 AM
Original message
The dumbest thing a voting-machine maker ever did
<Hacking a voting machine usually involves getting inside and swapping out a chip or two, so you would think they would make them really hard to open up. Sure enough, it you look at a Diebold (now called Premier Election Solutions) AccuVote-TS machine, there's a locked cover keeping everything secure. The only problem is that even election officials lose their keys occasionally, so Diebold sells new ones to "Diebold account holders" through their online store.

Now this is where it gets really dumb. Right there on the order page is a picture of the keys (since removed), showing exactly what they look like. Dumber still, it turns out that every AccuVote-TS machine uses the exact same key, and dumbest of all, it's essentially the same as many of the keys used for hotel mini bars and office file cabinets. A group studying voting machine security at Princeton University found that with three blank keys, a file, and a small vice, they could easily make two working keys by copying the key pattern from the Diebold website.>

http://dvice.com/archives/2008/10/voting_machines.php

Updates at Brad Blog: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=4066



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TygrBright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
1. Now why would you think that was 'dumb' on their part?
Sort of depends on what they're really trying to accomplish, doesn't it?

disputatiously,
Bright
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 01:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Ah, good point
Actually wasn't my words!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. Few hacks need to open a machine. Just a connection will do.
And that can be a wireless connection as well.

The key is mostly to make you look at something other than the stupidity of computerized voting as opposed to the less egregious computerized counting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
plaintiff Donating Member (418 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
4. Small vise...large vice.
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-25-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC