Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What's The Difference Between Welfare And Slavery? - Video

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:39 AM
Original message
What's The Difference Between Welfare And Slavery? - Video
http://crooksandliars.com/david-neiwert/wingnut-revisionism-oh-ole-time-slav

Jim Quinn yesterday on The War Room with Quinn & Rose:

"You know, I was thinking about this. You know, if you were a slave in the old South, what did you get as a slave? You got free room and board, you got free money, and you got rewarded for having children because that was just, you know, tomorrow's slave. So, you got a free house, you got free money, and you got rewarded for having children. Can I ask a question? How's that different from welfare? You get a free house, you get free food, and you get rewarded for having children. Oh, wait a minute, hold on a second. There is a difference: The slave had to work for it."

We still have a long way to go
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. jaw-dropping. . astounding.... what the fuck year is this?. . . .n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Madam Mossfern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. Obviously that person doesn't know about the Welfare to Work program
Edited on Sat Nov-08-08 11:50 AM by Madam Mossfern
All welfare recipients must either attend a job training program, school, or volunteer for 35 hours a week in order to receive their full benefits. If they do not comply, they lose their benefits.

The only issues is the quality of the programs (which are government sponsored). Yes, there are still lots of wrinkles to be ironed out, but by no means is the OP statement even close to the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. or the fact that it is not just blacks on welfare...
i.e. Joe the plumber
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
4. WAIT Wait wait
Slaves got paid? Did I sleep through my high school and college US History classes? Slaves in America got free money? WTF?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flstci Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Paid, yes. Free money, no. N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. OK, Clearly I'm ignorant of this.
During what period were slaves paid wages, how much did they earn, and why are they called slaves if they were actually indentured servants?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demwing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. So, I'm still waiting for a response
I'm dubious that slaves, not indentured servants, were paid wages in the United States, not in ancient Rome, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flstci Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. demwing are these good enough for you?
If not run a search on these names;

Moses Grandy, Venture Smith, Richard Allen, Aaron Siddles

See if that gives you what you are looking for. If not let me know and I'll try to find the history of one of the slaves we studied in our history class. I can't remember the name but given enough time I'm sure I could find it. It was very interesting.

I don't know if I'll be able to find this thread later so if you want more info pm me or something. I'm still pretty new to these boards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flstci Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Here's a little info and I'll see if I can find more.
But it was far more in the master’s interest to motivate his slaves by positive means. Far more important than whipping in managing the slaves was figuring out how to motivate. No plantation owner wanted slaves who were sullen, discontented, and hostile, who did just enough to get by. They wanted devoted, hard-working, responsible men who identified their fortunes with the fortunes of their masters. Such attitudes cannot be beaten into slaves. They had to be elicited.<22>

To achieve the desired response the planters developed a wide-ranging system of rewards. Some rewards were directed toward improving short-run performance (prizes for the individual or the gang with the best picking record on a given day or week). The prizes were such items as clothing, tobacco, whiskey, and very often cash. When slaves worked during times normally set aside for rest, they received extra pay — usually in cash.<23> Occasionally planters even devised elaborate schemes for profit sharing with their slaves.

All this evidence points to the fact that slaves lived at various levels of income. The average pecuniary income received by a prime field hand was roughly fifteen percent greater than the income he would have received for his labor as a free agricultural worker. Some slaves saved their money and were quite wealthy after the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flstci Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. Some slaves were also allowed to work outside of their
hours for other people for wages. They used those wages to purchase their freedom. It is hard to find the information I'm looking for but this is what I learned in my college history class.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flstci Donating Member (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Little bit more found
Many slaves purchased their freedom from their masters or occasionally from slave traders. In 1839 almost half (42%) of the free blacks in Cincinnati, Ohio, had "purchased themselves" from their masters.1 Often this required negotiating a price with the master and working at a wage trade for years to amass enough funds, as we read in Elizabeth Keckley's narrative. (Such a plan could fail, however, as we read in the narrative of Moses Grandy who bought himself three times before ultimate freedom.) John Meachum, after buying his own freedom, purchased about twenty other enslaved African Americans who ultimately purchased their freedom from him. We will read these accounts and those of Moses Grandy, Venture Smith, Richard Allen, Aaron Siddles, and others. In contrast, we read several accounts of African Americans who were freed by their masters as a reward; we do not know how often this occurred. (For free blacks' letters to their former masters, see Theme IV: IDENTITY: #3, Slave to Free). (xx pages.)



I'll post more when I find what I'm looking for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Actually it's true..to a certain degree.
Slaves were hired out to other plantation owners, certain industries, and as house-servants to individuals. The owners of the slaves were paid for their work but the slaves, sometimes, got a cut. In some instances, slaves were allowed to find their own work and earn wages as long as the owner was paid a percentage. This was mostly the case with "skilled" slaves. Carpenters, blacksmiths, etc. They were even allowed to find their own lodgings. Often, they were able to find their own jobs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
8. And, of course, if they didn't like it they could quit...Oh, wait.
This is the same ridiculous argument that slaveholders used in ante-bellum days. That the slaves were happy, well fed, well cared for, and wept when "ol' massa" went to his heavenly reward.

And, after the war the same people were truly amazed when the "grateful" slaves walked off the plantation and/or demanded wages for their labor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
10. And the reason "we still have a long way to go"?
Because we, as "progressives", haven't been effective in countering all this crap.

WHEN does any Air America program talk about poverty, homelessness?

WHEN does ANY "progressive" outlet actually give facts and figures about the lack of low-income housing?

It's why I finally gave up listening... I'm left out of the equation.

:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maryf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-08-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Here's a link...
Hey Bobbie, heres a link from a friend regarding just how little housing there is today, people also have to consider how difficult it really is to get services, not such a piece of cake...

http://blog.povertylaw.org/2008/09/the-return-of-one-for-one-replacement-for-demolished-public-housing-units/#more-73
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC