|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
ruggerson (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:25 PM Original message |
Should people who donated to Prop 8 be publicly exposed and humiliated? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
1. Are they ashamed of what they did? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MineralMan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
2. Not the point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cid_B (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 03:19 PM Response to Reply #2 |
162. So are police officer home addresses in some states |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TechBear_Seattle (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
3. If they donated enough, their names are already a matter of public record |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MNDemNY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
4. If they feel humiliated, that is their problem. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gollygee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
5. Wah wah to them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kid a (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:28 PM Response to Original message |
6. maybe invited to discussion and educated? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:31 PM Response to Original message |
7. Chalk me up for humiliation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodlessBiker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:33 PM Response to Original message |
8. Yes, they should be. No more Mr. Nice Gay. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
9. Why is this somehow different than the Christian "boycotts" we face all the time? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:34 PM Response to Original message |
10. They should be "exposed" ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:44 PM Response to Reply #10 |
20. If everyone knew what everyone else was doing, where would the privacy advocates be? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:15 PM Response to Reply #20 |
59. Some things are private. Some aren't. Funding in politics is not. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:50 PM Response to Reply #10 |
26. Personal right to privacy isn't same as secrecy in government -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:35 PM Response to Original message |
11. Yes! Absolutely. Their right is to free speech. Yours is, too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gristy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:37 PM Response to Original message |
12. Sounds like a logistical nightmare and could be expensive |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
13. Yep- the courage of your convictions and all that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:39 PM Response to Original message |
14. Private citizens should be allowed their privacy unless said donations are on the public record |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:42 PM Response to Reply #14 |
17. Any donation SHOULD be public record. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:46 PM Response to Reply #17 |
22. Seconded. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shadowknows69 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:48 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Wasn't sure about the anonymity rules |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:41 PM Response to Original message |
15. They were on God's side, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EFerrari (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
16. I wanted to track down the current managers of the Knights of Columbus. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libnnc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:42 PM Response to Original message |
18. They spend a ton of energy shaming me, I'd like to return the flavor. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:43 PM Response to Original message |
19. Why should anyone be humiliated for an opinion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:45 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. Shhh, don't act civilized. That's being devolved. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:54 PM Response to Reply #21 |
31. Civilized people don't try to strip others of equal rights. If simply exposing these |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:03 PM Response to Reply #31 |
39. There in lies the rub. Those who donated would be hard to humiliate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:06 PM Response to Reply #39 |
47. Humiliation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:09 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. So, you believe if they are not open to outreach you will be able to humiliate them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:09 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. Absolutely. It has ever been the case. Look at the history of civil rights struggles. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:15 PM Response to Reply #54 |
60. I respectfully disagree. N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:18 PM Response to Reply #60 |
64. Then you're in denial about the history of civil rights struggles. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:22 PM Response to Reply #64 |
67. As I said earlier, where are you going to start? I think at the top, lets humiliate the President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:24 PM Response to Reply #67 |
71. If equal civil rights were a real issue for you, you might be discussing real strategy |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:26 PM Response to Reply #71 |
76. What is snarky and disengenuous? I made a point you don't like? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:27 PM Response to Reply #76 |
79. You were, and are, disingenuous You'd have to care about an issue to discuss |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:28 PM Response to Reply #79 |
81. How am I not being sincere? Because I expressed an opinion? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:30 PM Response to Reply #81 |
84. A snarky and disingenuous opinion. That said, if you want to humiliate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:32 PM Response to Reply #84 |
87. Both said, publicly, they opposed same sex marriages. That is not snark, that is fact. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:34 PM Response to Reply #87 |
90. Did you read the OP? It's about humiliating (or not) those who suported Prop 8. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:35 PM Response to Reply #90 |
93. I guess I didn't understand what prop 8 was about. I thought it was about same sex marriage. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:36 PM Response to Reply #93 |
94. Obama and Biden both stated they OPPOSED Prop 8. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:38 PM Response to Reply #94 |
97. And they both said they opposed same sex marriages. Are you not getting that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:41 PM Response to Reply #97 |
103. No, I got that - but that's not the question. The question in this thead is about Prop8. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:42 PM Response to Reply #103 |
105. Evidently. If they are against same sex marriage but for same sex marriage then |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:44 PM Response to Reply #105 |
109. Since you are opposed to same sex marriage, I don't expect you to understand much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:46 PM Response to Reply #109 |
113. You're most welcome. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gollygee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:43 PM Response to Reply #97 |
107. It is possible to think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:45 PM Response to Reply #107 |
111. Both Obama and Biden said they believed this was a states rights issue. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gollygee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:45 PM Response to Reply #111 |
112. And they said they would have voted against it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:47 PM Response to Reply #112 |
115. So, which candidate did I vote for?! The ones opposed to same sex marriage or the ones |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:47 PM Response to Reply #115 |
117. Since I'm guessing you voted for McCain, you probably don't have to worry about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:49 PM Response to Reply #117 |
120. You would be wrong. Sorry, try again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 06:06 PM Response to Reply #120 |
163. OMFG!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:47 PM Response to Reply #111 |
116. And they said in their opinion it shouldn't be in the state Constitution. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiFascist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 07:09 PM Response to Reply #97 |
169. I think there is a subtle point you are both missing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:11 PM Response to Reply #31 |
55. Deleted message |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:13 PM Response to Reply #55 |
56. Yes, they are. Same as if they are opposed to equal civil rights for anyone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:14 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. So, when will we start humiliating the President Elect? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:17 PM Response to Reply #57 |
62. Who said anyone isn't allowed an opinion? People are entitled to wrong and even |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:21 PM Response to Reply #62 |
66. You did. You said we should humiliate anyone with an opinion opposite |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tallison (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:24 PM Original message |
They should be exposed. Whether they're humiliated by it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:25 PM Response to Original message |
73. That is what I said before. I don't think you can humiliate someone who truly believes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
closeupready (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:51 PM Response to Reply #73 |
123. If they believe it, then no worries - they can't be humiliated, they will just roll with it, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:55 PM Response to Reply #123 |
126. That would be the general idea. If you donate to something you believe in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:57 PM Response to Reply #126 |
129. Someone who supports Prop 8 is trying to give advice on how to defeat Prop 8? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:59 PM Response to Reply #129 |
132. Take it anyway you like. I'm simply giving an opinion. I'll bet there are more here who agree with |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 02:00 PM Response to Reply #132 |
134. So you're saying if I'd been sweet with you you'd change your mind and vote no on Prop8? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 02:04 PM Response to Reply #134 |
138. No, I'm saying I'm an open minded thinker. If you can show me the error of my ways |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 02:06 PM Response to Reply #138 |
143. The fact that a Prop 8 proponent thinks I'm doing something wrong is confirmation that I'm right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 02:07 PM Response to Reply #143 |
145. Ok, good luck with that. I truly wish you well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 02:08 PM Response to Reply #145 |
147. Yeah, I'll bet you do. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tallison (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:24 PM Response to Reply #66 |
69. Dupe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:25 PM Response to Reply #66 |
72. People can have an opinion, and others can respond. That's free speech. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:28 PM Response to Reply #72 |
80. There is a difference between 'response' and 'humiliation', don't you think? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:29 PM Response to Reply #80 |
82. Not really. No one can make someone feel humiliated except the person who feels it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:31 PM Response to Reply #82 |
85. That's what I've been saying. Those who have taken the step to donate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:33 PM Response to Reply #85 |
88. If they're not humiliated, why do they not want to be exposed? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:37 PM Response to Reply #88 |
95. Who would be oppressing whom? See the pendulum swings. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:38 PM Response to Reply #95 |
99. Like oppressing the KKK by exposing them? What a twisted sense of civil rights you have. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:39 PM Response to Reply #99 |
101. Educate me. Please. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:42 PM Response to Reply #101 |
104. People who oppose equal civil rights are oppressive. I support equal civil rights even |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:44 PM Response to Reply #104 |
108. I'm not from CA but I would have voted to support prop 8. How would you expose me? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:46 PM Response to Reply #108 |
114. You're like a Republican telling a Democrat what the Democrat's strategy should be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:47 PM Response to Reply #114 |
118. Huh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:48 PM Response to Reply #118 |
119. Since you oppose my civil rights, why would I take your word on what my strategy should be? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:51 PM Response to Reply #119 |
122. Oh, thanks for the clairification. No need to take my advice, it is worth what you paid for it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevinbgoode (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:54 PM Response to Reply #108 |
125. Why would I need your approval to marry? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:56 PM Response to Reply #125 |
128. You don't. Evidently you need my vote. Humiliation wins multitudes to the vote machine. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:58 PM Response to Reply #128 |
131. You've already stated you'd vote against equal civil rights. Are we supposed to believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 02:02 PM Response to Reply #131 |
137. Deleted message |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 02:04 PM Response to Reply #137 |
139. Again: If I'd been all sweet with you would that have changed your vote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 02:06 PM Response to Reply #139 |
144. See my response up thread. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 02:09 PM Response to Reply #144 |
149. So you're refusing to admit that no matter how nice I am with you you'd stll vote against my rights. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevinbgoode (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 03:13 PM Response to Reply #128 |
159. Actually I believe that is what the court case is all about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:56 PM Response to Reply #108 |
127. By the way, you are in violation of DU rules for use. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:57 PM Response to Reply #127 |
130. Oh, sorry. Thought I was expressing an opinion. Guess you will |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:59 PM Response to Reply #130 |
133. Expressing an opinion doesn't come with any guarantee against consequences. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 02:06 PM Response to Reply #133 |
142. I thought we were a community of 'thinkers' which comes with an opinion or two. Guess |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 02:07 PM Response to Reply #142 |
146. Would you expect to opine that you oppose interracial marriage and that would be OK here? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libnnc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 02:00 PM Response to Reply #130 |
135. rules are rules. It ain't your board. Buh-bye now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 02:04 PM Response to Reply #135 |
140. Ok, well it's been fun. Hope y'all enjoy group think. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libnnc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 02:08 PM Response to Reply #140 |
148. I oppose YOUR marriage, how do you like that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 02:11 PM Response to Reply #140 |
151. Group think, like believing in civil rights for everyone. Okay. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
libnnc (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 02:23 PM Response to Reply #151 |
153. Looks like fucktard go bye-bye |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 06:07 PM Response to Reply #153 |
164. So I go to a marriage rights march, and when I come back the homophobe is gone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gollygee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 08:22 PM Response to Reply #164 |
171. Good work! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:05 PM Original message |
Evidently you were correct. N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:51 PM Response to Reply #19 |
27. If they are humiliated by their own actions it's their decision. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:53 PM Response to Reply #19 |
29. Religion isn't "opinion" ..it's universal teaching/policy -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:58 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. Are you so certain everyone who voted for prop 8 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:03 PM Response to Reply #34 |
40. We are certain it had backing by large organized patriarchal religion .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:04 PM Response to Reply #40 |
42. And that is everyone. Ahhhh I see your point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:07 PM Response to Reply #42 |
48. NO -- Mormons pushed an anti-homosexual Prop religious voters were against --!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:09 PM Response to Reply #48 |
53. The evidence would suggest otherwise. N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 02:10 PM Response to Reply #53 |
150. Dude, you think its okay to STRIP PEOPLE of the their CIVIL RIGHTS, but it's not okay to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
defendandprotect (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 02:23 PM Response to Reply #53 |
154. The evidence is that this Prop was constructed to appeal to religious fanatics -- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:38 PM Response to Reply #34 |
98. CNN exit polls showed 91% of voters who "practiced no religion" voted no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:40 PM Response to Reply #98 |
102. And what part of 100% is 91%? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:45 PM Response to Reply #102 |
110. I dunno, the fucking OVERWHELMING MAJORITY, maybe? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:53 PM Response to Reply #110 |
124. If those numbers are in fact correct, you still had 9% who did not vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 02:20 PM Response to Reply #124 |
152. Please do yourself a favor and take a basic statistics class. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gollygee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 02:27 PM Response to Reply #124 |
157. So 9% had some other reason for being bigots |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:53 PM Response to Reply #19 |
30. The OP isn't about voters, it's about donors. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:59 PM Response to Reply #30 |
35. They are still donating to support their opinion, are they not? N/T |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:17 PM Response to Reply #35 |
63. And people are allowed to express theirs right back, are they not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:24 PM Response to Reply #63 |
70. Absolutely. I just dont think you should castigate someone for an opinion. I think |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:26 PM Response to Reply #70 |
77. If that's what you think people *should* do, go ahead and do it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:30 PM Response to Reply #77 |
83. I've obviously chosen my boundary. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:31 PM Response to Reply #83 |
86. Yes. Unfortunately, you have chosen a boundary that givs you an imagined authority |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:35 PM Response to Reply #86 |
91. Guess again. I have no authority. I've simply stated you will get farther |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:37 PM Response to Reply #91 |
96. Your uninformed opinion has been considered. When you're ready to make a real |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flstci (197 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:39 PM Response to Reply #96 |
100. I don't agree with same sex marriage. Are you sure you would want me to do 'the real work'? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:43 PM Response to Reply #100 |
106. As I said up above, you were being disingenuous. When someone opposed to equality |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kevinbgoode (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 02:00 PM Response to Reply #35 |
136. Their opinion on someone else's marriage? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:05 PM Response to Reply #19 |
43. The public can be made aware of the opinion somebody has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:08 PM Response to Reply #43 |
50. Precisely! If exposing what someone does makes that person feel shamed, it's their |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
donco6 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 06:42 PM Response to Reply #19 |
166. What's humiliating about it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkofos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:48 PM Response to Original message |
23. Money is not free speech. They should be exposed for the bigots they are. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:01 PM Response to Reply #23 |
37. Money IS free speech. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkofos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:07 PM Response to Reply #37 |
49. They were wrong then and you are wrong now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:09 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. Why do you think free speech and truth are wrong? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dkofos (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:25 PM Response to Reply #52 |
74. TSTGTMOMP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:50 PM Response to Reply #49 |
121. And how am I wrong? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mrreowwr_kittty (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:50 PM Response to Original message |
25. Political contributions are a matter of public record |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:52 PM Response to Original message |
28. They absolutely should be. This is a cornerstone of civil rights struggles across the world. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlancheSplanchnik (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
32. yes. Also, repub voters should be charged triple taxes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU GrovelBot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 12:54 PM Response to Original message |
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ## |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:00 PM Response to Original message |
36. Yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Spectral Music (349 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:02 PM Response to Original message |
38. The Prop 8 yes people were going to do the same to companies who were against the prop |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mari333 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:04 PM Response to Original message |
41. You can look up all Prop 8 contributors on here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:06 PM Response to Reply #41 |
46. Thank you... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
petronius (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:05 PM Response to Original message |
44. Political donations are considered a form of speech, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
richabk (99 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:06 PM Response to Original message |
45. Database of all Prop 8 donations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaJones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:15 PM Response to Original message |
58. only if they can be positively identified as real bigots. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gollygee (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:16 PM Response to Reply #58 |
61. Hah. You won't catch me this time. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:19 PM Response to Reply #58 |
65. Oh snap. You used "the B-word". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RC (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
68. What makes you think they aren't proud of donating to stop Prop 8? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaJones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:26 PM Response to Reply #68 |
75. same reason the KKK wears hoods. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 06:45 PM Response to Reply #75 |
167. lol |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
McCamy Taylor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:27 PM Response to Original message |
78. No, you should target their sons for conversion to the "gay agenda". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IndianaJones (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:35 PM Response to Reply #78 |
92. they aren't knee jerk anti-gay....they are deeply and thoughtfully hateful and bigoted. nt. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starry Messenger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 02:26 PM Response to Reply #78 |
156. They are already "scared". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
noamnety (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 01:33 PM Response to Original message |
89. This isn't an attack on their free speech. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunkerbuster1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 02:05 PM Response to Original message |
141. Only if it serves some practical purpose. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fleshdancer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 02:24 PM Response to Original message |
155. donating to prop 8 is more than just an opinion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starry Messenger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 02:34 PM Response to Original message |
158. I'm very glad the harsh light of media attention is coming to swing on these donations. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Karenina (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 03:17 PM Response to Reply #158 |
161. YES! Their mouths can elucidate why their money goes where! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 03:16 PM Response to Original message |
160. Humiliate the fucks!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hulklogan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
165. Yes yes yes humiliate them, publicly shame them, and turn your back to them when you see them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AntiFascist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 06:59 PM Response to Original message |
168. I would personally draw the line at creating a hardcopy of a list... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ColbertWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Nov-15-08 07:11 PM Response to Original message |
170. Absolutely. "Actions," I'd like to introduce you to "Consequences." k+r, n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon May 06th 2024, 08:51 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC