Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

British Beach *Boinkers* in Dubai Get a $500 Fine

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 12:22 AM
Original message
British Beach *Boinkers* in Dubai Get a $500 Fine
Dubai: A British couple allegedly caught indulging in sexual activity on the beach - and later got a three-month suspended jail term - had submitted a written undertaking that they'll get married pending church approval from London.

Judges of the Dubai Court of Appeal on Tuesday suspended the three-month jail term against 34-year-old British male visitor and his 36-year-old compatriot female because they were convinced that the couple will not repeat their crime ever again.

Presiding Judge Mohammad Abdul Aziz Hafez confirmed in the verdict sheet that the couple was incriminated in sexual activity on the beachside and committing public indecency.

The court rejected the convicts', 34-year-old V.A. and 36-year-old M.P. denial of indulging in sexual activity in public and committing public indecency, and deemed it as a sheer attempt to avoid justice.

According to articles 83 and 84 of the Federal Penal Code, Presiding Judge Hafez treated the couple leniently by suspending the jail term and confirming that they will pay a fine of Dh1,000 (for consuming liquor) before they get deported... http://www.gulfnews.com/nation/Police_and_The_Courts/10262495.html


Seems pretty fair for folks who allegedly resisted arrest, were drunk in public and fornicating in full-view on a family beach.

Someone always seems to report the horror stories of the Middle-East without follow-up... Anyway, that's what happened in this story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
1. that's a hard one to swallow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. LOL
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 12:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. I would have expected a stiffer penalty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-26-08 01:10 AM
Response to Original message
4. Public indecency?
I wouldn't think it would be the sexual activity, but their pasty white nakedness blinding unsuspecting people who weren't quick enough to avert their eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC