Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

CBS (Andrew Cohen): Fitzgerald performance revelation not included in DOJ doc-dump - leaked to WP

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 11:10 AM
Original message
CBS (Andrew Cohen): Fitzgerald performance revelation not included in DOJ doc-dump - leaked to WP

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2007/03/20/couricandco/entry2587154.shtml

At Justice: Making A List, Checking It Twice
Posted by Andrew Cohen

<snip>

Second, this information about Fitzgerald was not included in the thousands of pages of material released late last night by the Justice Department in response to Congressional requests. Instead its contents were leaked to the Post by an anonymous source. So the question they’ll be asking around Washington today, and perhaps for quite some time, is this: what else has the Justice Department and the White House chosen on executive privilege grounds to refrain from releasing to the legislative branch and, by extension, to us? You are going to hear that question like a mantra over the next few days.

That’s why the ballyhooed disclosures of the material last night is not likely to do much to quell the furor over the dismissal of those prosecutors. To paraphrase former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Congress despite the new material still doesn’t know what it doesn’t know about the firings—but it does know that it doesn’t know all it needs to know. In Washington, that’s a recipe for a lot of whining, a lot of posturing, and at least a few more pitched battles to come. As for Fitzgerald? All I can think of is Woody Allen’s famous line: “I’d never join a club that would allow a person like me to be a member.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mr_hat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. Groucho's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. That was Groucho's line
But other than that, awesome article. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 11:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Yes, but it still irks me that he didn't fact-check the quote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
3. I can hear the shredders whirling from here. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThoughtCriminal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. Probably tip of the iceberg
That was sloppy - did they think nobody would notice?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 11:26 AM
Response to Original message
5. Off to the Greatest Page
Can't wait to see what happens next...

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
6. Do we know exactly what the document request sent to the DOJ
said? I haven't seen it, but I can tell you, I've received MANY of this type of request in the past, and they are ALWAYS very broad in their requests. Most, if not all, said "Copies of ALL printed, written, or recorded information relevant, but not exclusive to XXXXX."

Unless this request was limited to "emails",it looks to me like the DOJ has been non-copliant!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. oh they sent documents all right. very few emails. mostly 8 or 10 copies of
documents that are already available.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turn CO Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 08:11 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. and they send copies of each part of the email string and count it
over and over as separate "docs". Jeepers!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terri S Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
7. I knew it!
It was all too convenient..too easy.. 3000 pages and AFTER that he-who-shall-not-be-named calls gonzo and gives his full support. I kept thinking.. all those pages, some kind of snow job going on..overwhelm them with garbage and take care of the incriminating stuff.. it just sounded too damn helpful .. very unlike this bunch. Something's up .. or I'm just too damn cynical anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
verse18 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. This is getting juicer and juicer by the day.
(rubbing hands together, smiling gleefully)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
10. a selective leak of what they are not telling you....WH Counsel doing his job?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 01:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. So Karl Rove wanted Fitzgerald fired. I wonder why???????????????????????
(what a bunch of criminals)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. WAPO article here:
Edited on Tue Mar-20-07 01:58 PM by emulatorloo
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/032007K.shtml

Fitzgerald Ranked During Leak Case
By Dan Eggen and John Solomon
The Washington Post

Tuesday 20 March 2007

Justice Department fired two with same rating.

U.S. Attorney Patrick J. Fitzgerald was ranked among prosecutors who had "not distinguished themselves" on a Justice Department chart sent to the White House in March 2005, when he was in the midst of leading the CIA leak investigation that resulted in the perjury conviction of a vice presidential aide, administration officials said yesterday.

The ranking placed Fitzgerald below "strong U.S. Attorneys ... who exhibited loyalty" to the administration but above "weak U.S. Attorneys who ... chafed against Administration initiatives, etc.," according to Justice documents.

The chart was the first step in an effort to identify U.S. attorneys who should be removed. Two prosecutors who received the same ranking as Fitzgerald were later fired, documents show.

Fitzgerald's ranking adds another dimension to the prosecutor firings, which began as a White House proposal to remove all 93 U.S. attorneys after the 2004 elections and evolved into the coordinated dismissal of eight last year, a move that has infuriated lawmakers and led to calls for Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales to resign.


more at link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC