Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"We'll proceed with subpoenas on Thursday" Schumer just said, live

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:00 PM
Original message
"We'll proceed with subpoenas on Thursday" Schumer just said, live
Edited on Tue Mar-20-07 02:01 PM by Atman
In response to the WH's ridiculous offer. He said he'd be meeting with Conyers and Leahy and then a reporter asked for clarification, but of course, MSNBC had to cut away before he responded for -- I am NOT making this up -- "The big story today, a twelve year old boy found after being lost in the woods." I'm series. 100%.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
grasswire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. was this BEFORE they announced the "deal"?
Or after?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. After
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Just now...AFTER
In response to "the deal."

/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. Where is confirmation
that "deal" is done?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wicket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. w00t!
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zanne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
29. Could this go to the Supreme Court?
If there is a standoff, is there any remedy on our part? Any legal minds out there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. CNN has about tweny seconds about the email release and
all the rest. And about ten minutes about Anna Nicole and the DNA test, the judge smoking a joint, and all the rest of the stuff. As usual.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. the GOP/Media Establishment is in full swing -- Karl's Facs machine must be humming
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jannyk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. Schumer wants 'oaths and transcripts"! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:03 PM
Response to Original message
7. Here we go!
:bounce: BRING IT ON! I am SO ready for this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. Sounds like a stand off !!
Can Pigboy and Harriette be arrested for not appearing once served with a subpoena?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. how far will it go?
Do you think that the dems will fight for this one or cave?
I hope that they push them to the wall and make them testify under oath, on tv, live, with transcripts, and a sign language interpretter.
Give em hell, dems
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I think they will fight. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
14. Fight
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
9. Bad day at Black Rock for the Rove & Miers ROFL
I just emailed my thanks in advance to Sen. Leahy for accepting nothing less than sworn testimony from these two a**holes. (said it nicer though)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
12. Ted Olson's probably firing up the SCOTUS ...
as we speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
13. what WH ridiculous offer? I missed something. tell me. tell me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Atman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. WH "offered" to let Miers and Rove be "interviewed" not under oath, behind...
...closed doors, with no transcripts.

Yeah, right.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. heard that one before.... 9/11 hearings? Thanks. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
17. CNN just said the committee rejected bush's offer for interview
or rove and miers. One thing. miers does not work for the white house any longer. She is a private citizen. What right does bush have to reject her testifying. And since rove is a federal employee whose salary is paid by the taxpayers how could bush deny that also.

Now if they were elected there might be some question as to whether they can or not. But I don't think federal employees have the right to reject testimony under oath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antonialee839 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Any lawyer types out there who can tell us if
Edited on Tue Mar-20-07 02:27 PM by antonialee839
they will be compelled to testify because of the precedent set during the Whitewater mess? Under oath, I mean.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. As far as I can tell, yes, since Clinton testified under oath.
If any other lawyer type has anything to add, please do. I assume that rule would apply to Cabinet members and other high officials.

So pulling a Nixon (invoking executive privilege) won't wash anymore, because of what the Repukes did in their Clinton witchhunt! It's coming back to bite 'em in the arse! :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
loudsue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. I thought miers was still w/ bush. Did she leave her employer?
I missed something. Hard to keep up here.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #20
25. She left a few months ago.
Wanted to spend more time with her family, ya know.

;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #17
24. not sure what the law is, but these people WORK FOR US, and they have NO RIGHT NOT to be required to
testify in any investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
druidity33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #17
28. Isn't Meiers
*ush's personal attorney? She might try and claim privilege on that account...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Manifestor_of_Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
22. Rock On, Chuck!!!
:yourock: :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:46 PM
Response to Original message
26. What show cut Schumer off? Let's bombard MSNBC for cowardice!
If people getting up in arms and blasting sponsors of that superbowl peep-show of Janet Jackson's boob can generate a publicity uproar, maybe we can do the same.

An INSTANT of REAL News and you people drowned it in a "feel good story" about a little boy being found.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. CNN is talking about it, saying there won't be transcripts or under oath.
OK 20 seconds of news on an issue of great importance to everyone, then it's time to bring out Buzz Aldrin walking on the Grand Canyon bridge to nowhere.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zenlitened Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 07:19 PM
Response to Original message
30. "If Karl Rove plans to tell the truth, he has nothing to fear from being under oath."
... “After telling a bunch of different stories about why they fired the U.S. attorneys, the Bush administration is not entitled to the benefit of the doubt,” said Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, the majority leader. “Congress and the American people deserve a straight answer. If Karl Rove plans to tell the truth, he has nothing to fear from being under oath like any other witness.”

Senator Patrick J. Leahy, the Vermont Democrat who heads the Senate Judiciary Committee, was just as emphatic. ... “I don’t accept his offer. It is not constructive and it is not helpful to be telling the Senate how to do our investigation, or to prejudge its outcome.”

“Testimony should be on the record and under oath,” Mr. Leahy said, repeating a demand that he first made on network television over the weekend. “That’s the formula for true accountability.”

(snip)

Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York and a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, also reacted coldly to the White House offer. Mr. Schumer said Mr. Fielding was proposing in effect that Mr. Rove and Ms. Miers be available for “conversations” with lawmakers.

“That’s fine,” Mr. Schumer said. “Let’s have a conversation under oath, with a transcript.”

Link:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/20/washington/20cnd-attorney.html?_r=1&hp&oref=slogin


:dem:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
texpatriot2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
31. WHAT ARE THEY HIDING? It is still an appropriate question. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC