Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I am not a fan of Rahm Emanuel, however, on Charlie Rose last night

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
solara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:38 PM
Original message
I am not a fan of Rahm Emanuel, however, on Charlie Rose last night
Emmanuel made a lot of sense. He said ( paraphrasing) that he was more interested in WHY the 8 Prosecutors were fired.. what were they doing? Why them particularly out of the 93 ?

Rather than just focusing on Gonzales... he wants to investigate the common denominator of the fired prosecutors. He said it appears that very one of them were building cases against highly-placed Republicans for corruption or refusing to spend time and money to go after Democrats who had done nothing. He believes that Congress should not allow themselves to be completely sidetracked by whether Gonzales should resign or be fired. He agreed that it is very important for Gonzales to be held accountable and face the consequences of his irresponsible and possibly criminal behavior, but equally or even more important is to discover the facts regarding the underlying CAUSE of the Gonzales scandal.

It would not surprise me if Domenici and Wilson, who are just two of the 'players' involved, feel a sense of growing optimism now because the spotlight shines so brightly on Gonzales. And why not? They can do what Hastert and others have done all along.. just crawl back under the Republick Party rock and lay low until the freeding frenzy blows over. That would be business as usual for Congress BJ'07 ( Before January '07)

Let the Gonzoid spin in the wind as long as possible.. the longer he retains his position the more we are going to find out about the obstruction and co-opting of the JoD for political purposes.



INVESTIGATE IMPEACH INDICT INCARCERATE :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
solara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Rahm was on Colbert? lol nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
gratuitous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Rahm's a mixed bag
Sometimes he's on and does his Democratic best, and I'm pleased he's out there as a spokesman. Other times, he's a DLC-spouting mealymouth taking that nice, easy, primrose-laden path to Hell.

And though the point has been made in a lot of places (particularly Talking Points Memo, which is putting down the last payment today and now officially owns this story), it's good to have it out in more venues that the Gonzales 8 were fired for being (1) too interested in prosecuting real Republican corruption; or (B) not interested enough in trumping up voter fraud cases where no evidence existed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
solara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Agreed. The more light shed on this the better nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I agree.
It can be a source of frustration: the guy is definitely capable of doing outstanding work. Other times, he seems too close to the neoliberal camp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC