Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DC Likely to Gain Voting Member of Congress

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 06:56 PM
Original message
DC Likely to Gain Voting Member of Congress
Eleanor Holmes Norton's schedule is likely going to become a lot more crowded in the next year.

With Barack Obama's election, along with Democratic gains in the Senate, Norton -- the District of Columbia's non-voting delegate to the House of Representatives -- is poised to become a full-fledged Representative, giving DC a voting member of Congress for the first time in the nation's history.

Senate Democrats have added at least seven members to their caucus this year, with two races yet to be decided. While a filibuster-proof 60-vote majority remains elusive, the gains should be enough to move forward a DC voting-rights bill, among other measures that are supported by moderate Republicans, the Washington Post notes Monday.

Under a measure that passed the House by a wide margin last year, Norton would receive a vote in the House on behalf of the District's nearly 600,000 residents. The bill also would give Utah an additional House member, bringing the total in the House to 437.

more: http://rawstory.com/news/2008/DC_likely_to_gain_voting_member_1201.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 06:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. oh no Utah
one more fukin Mormon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberalboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 07:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. about time!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glimmer of Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 07:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah for DC. Utah?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GentryDixon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 07:14 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. As much as Utah hates the thought of a Democratic seat for DC
they know they will gain another Republican, Church marching sheep for their state. I live in Utah. I know there is no such thing as separation of Church and State. The Church reviews the bills before final vote by the Legislature. Since the majority of the representatives are Mormon this probably doesn't put a great burden on the Church. I wouldn't be surprised if they didn't have a direct hand in the authoring of the bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. As I understand it, Utah just lost out to NC for an additional seat at the 2000 reapportionment
by a matter of a few thousand people.

Also, it is nearly as reliably repuke as DC is Dem, so this idea was floated as a politically palatable compromise, i.e., each party gets one of the new seats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 07:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. This would be unconstitutional. Adding a voting Rep. to DC will require a Constitutional amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 07:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Why? Because it is not a "state"?
Virginia is a Commonwealth. Why can't a District have a vote?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Romulox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 07:42 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. "Representatives shall be apportioned among the several states according to their respective numbers
..."

14th Amendment, US Constitution, Sec. 2.

Viriginia is both a commonwealth and a US State.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Posteritatis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
7. If the populations mandate it, I say hooray to both of them
Representation's a good thing, and I'm not about to oppose it because it might lead to someone I dislike being elected. That's their game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Well said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rvablue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-01-08 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's about time.....I've always found this to be ridiculous that so many
Americans have no representation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC