|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
OwnedByFerrets (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 08:58 AM Original message |
Biden to be barred...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GodlessBiker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
1. Because Reid can't bar Cheney from the Republican caucus. That's up to them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
rateyes (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
2. He talked big about the Senate intervening in Senate recount in MN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 09:00 AM Original message |
I would assume Cheney attended the Republican caucus meetings, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
3. Calm down. This has nothing to do with Reid or his spine... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elocs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 09:46 AM Response to Reply #3 |
23. Why would anyone here at DU want to pass up the opportunity to call another Democrat "spineless"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 10:27 AM Response to Reply #23 |
33. I've been known to criticize Reid and Pelosi, but think it's a good |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tritsofme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
4. Um..how would Reid have stopped Cheney from meeting with Republicans? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChairmanAgnostic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 09:01 AM Response to Original message |
5. that's fine. UNless and until the senate is tied. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 09:12 AM Response to Reply #5 |
14. Even if it is 50/50, the VP, by the Constitution, still will break ties |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
atreides1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 09:02 AM Response to Original message |
6. Because Reid is a Democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 09:04 AM Response to Reply #6 |
10. Reid is corrupt and his wife is still a lobbyist. Replace him. eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 09:37 AM Response to Reply #10 |
21. What for not having any say in a republican function? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 09:49 AM Response to Reply #21 |
25. Oh my, you tolerate a multi-dimension message board by making simplistic assumptions. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SemiCharmedQuark (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 09:03 AM Response to Original message |
7. It's nothing bad. Biden had said that he wanted to restore the office of VP to its original intent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 09:03 AM Response to Original message |
8. Replace Reid and don't bar Biden. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 09:39 AM Response to Reply #8 |
22. Biden actually wants this too. VP is not a part of the legislative branch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 09:54 AM Response to Reply #22 |
27. Whoa! Is your favorite song also ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 10:05 AM Response to Reply #27 |
29. and what's your favorite song? "I'm an asshole" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 10:15 AM Response to Reply #29 |
31. No, I'm not attempting to convey a sense of hopelessness, but your "Politics of Disney" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 11:08 AM Response to Reply #31 |
36. Wow, nice assumptions - you provide that service for all DUers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RB TexLa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 09:03 AM Response to Original message |
9. Do you also think the republican leader decides who meets with the Democratic caucus? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
flobee (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 09:04 AM Response to Original message |
11. Good enough for repugs-good enough for dems too! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 09:07 AM Response to Original message |
12. So it should be. LBJ was barred from them as well when he was VP. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
meegbear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 09:07 AM Response to Original message |
13. DUMP REID!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 09:14 AM Response to Original message |
15. What's the big deal? The Vice President has no business in a Senate meeting |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lyric (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 10:44 AM Response to Reply #15 |
35. Exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Historic NY (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 09:25 AM Response to Original message |
16. Sarah said she'd rule the Senate if she was VP & make policy you betcha... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shifting_sands (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 09:27 AM Response to Original message |
17. oh please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 09:34 AM Response to Original message |
18. Please explain how Reid is supposed to bar Cheney from the GOP caucus |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 09:35 AM Response to Original message |
19. Reid has no control what the republican caucus does. And Biden was supportive of this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 09:37 AM Response to Original message |
20. Didn't LBJ go to the caucus when he was VP? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MiniMe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 09:51 AM Response to Reply #20 |
26. I think he tried, but he was barred from attending |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 09:54 AM Response to Reply #26 |
28. Oh, I agree it is not a big deal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 09:48 AM Response to Original message |
24. Biden, Reid, and the Dem Senate are correct to bar Biden. Please, Please Dems - don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 10:06 AM Response to Reply #24 |
30. Why do you think Jeffords left the party - it was from the treatment by Cheney. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ShortnFiery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 10:18 AM Response to Reply #30 |
32. With their lack of FILIBUSTER, what makes you think that Reid may not have similar corporate |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 11:09 AM Response to Reply #32 |
37. I don't know, I'm just a dumb DUer - why don't you just tell me since I seem to not have a clue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blondeatlast (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 10:39 AM Response to Original message |
34. Setting up a wall between the Legislative and Eexecutive branches (again)? I LOVE THIS, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynneSin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 11:12 AM Response to Reply #34 |
39. Ok first, there is no wall. This wasn't something Reid was doing to Biden |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 11:11 AM Response to Original message |
38. You watch, Biden's gonna shoot him in the face with a quail gun |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lumberjack_jeff (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Dec-09-08 11:14 AM Response to Original message |
40. The only way to get congressional dems to stand up against "the man"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sun May 05th 2024, 01:50 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC