Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Biden to be barred......

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 08:58 AM
Original message
Biden to be barred......
Edited on Tue Dec-09-08 09:53 AM by OwnedByFerrets
from Democratic Caucus Meetings.

Politico's Mike Allen is previewing an article set to appear in Sunday's Las Vegas Sun about Harry Reid's efforts to roll back the Vice President's expanded role under Dick Cheney by barring Joe Biden from Senate Democratic caucus meetings:

"The new Congress will reassert its constitutional independence from the White House by barring the vice president from joining in internal Senate deliberations, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said in an interview with The Sun. The move is intended to restore checks and balances to a system that tilted heavily toward the White House in the Bush presidency. By giving Vice President Dick Cheney regular access to Senate Republican caucuses, at times with White House advisers in tow, party unity became more important to many Republicans than upholding their responsibilities to provide legislative oversight of the executive, experts say. Asked if Vice-President Joe Biden will be allowed to attend Senate Democratic caucus meetings, Reid said: 'Absolutely not.'"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/12/06/biden-to-be-barred-from-d_n_148966.html


Edited to remove snarky remarks. SS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
GodlessBiker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
1. Because Reid can't bar Cheney from the Republican caucus. That's up to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
2. He talked big about the Senate intervening in Senate recount in MN
He won't do a damned thing. Spineless is right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:00 AM
Original message
I would assume Cheney attended the Republican caucus meetings,
not ours. If so, Reid couldn't have done anything about that. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Calm down. This has nothing to do with Reid or his spine...
Edited on Tue Dec-09-08 09:03 AM by babylonsister
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/12/biden-camp-says.html

snip//

But Biden spokesperson Elizabeth Alexander notes that Biden had "no intention" of going to the meetings anyway and there is no conflict at all between him and Reid.

"Vice President-elect Biden had no intention of continuing this practice started by Vice President Cheney of regularly attending internal legislative branch meetings," she told ABC News. "He firmly believes in restoring the Office of the vice president to its historical role. He and Sen. Reid see eye to eye on this."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elocs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #3
23. Why would anyone here at DU want to pass up the opportunity to call another Democrat "spineless"?
After all, it is simply constructive criticism. Besides, tidbits of Democrat is one of our favorite appetizers here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:27 AM
Response to Reply #23
33. I've been known to criticize Reid and Pelosi, but think it's a good
idea to do so only when they actually deserve it. This isn't one of those times.
And I get your drift; lots of that going on around here lately.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:00 AM
Response to Original message
4. Um..how would Reid have stopped Cheney from meeting with Republicans?
Exactly?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChairmanAgnostic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. that's fine. UNless and until the senate is tied.
that said, Reid is a spineless SOB. But someone who is worse runs the other 1/2 of congress. Pelosi does not belong there. Get rid of her already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:12 AM
Response to Reply #5
14. Even if it is 50/50, the VP, by the Constitution, still will break ties
- and will define the Democrats as the Majority party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:02 AM
Response to Original message
6. Because Reid is a Democrat
And does not get to decide who takes part in the Senate Republican caucuses! The Republican leadership makes that decision, and the last time I checked Senator Reid wasn't a member of the Republican leadership.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Reid is corrupt and his wife is still a lobbyist. Replace him. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:37 AM
Response to Reply #10
21. What for not having any say in a republican function?
:eyes:

Trust me, whomever we replace him with will become enemy #1 at DU so I see no difference with who the majority leader is.

And republican caucus can do whatever they want to do. Democrats have no control over that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #21
25. Oh my, you tolerate a multi-dimension message board by making simplistic assumptions.
Gee, it must be hard reckoning truth from fantasy? There's no ONE OPINION on a multi-dimensional message board. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
7. It's nothing bad. Biden had said that he wanted to restore the office of VP to its original intent
before Cheney made it essentially "co-president"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
8. Replace Reid and don't bar Biden.
Reid has been chicken-shit every time it counted with the Republican Ruled Senate. Replace this worthless man to go join his (nepotist benefiting) sons in Nevada. The whole corrupt family deserves each other. :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #8
22. Biden actually wants this too. VP is not a part of the legislative branch
seriously

Oh and according to CPAC they don't see him as much of a conservative

http://www.acuratings.org/2007all.htm#NV
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #22
27. Whoa! Is your favorite song also ...
"Everything She does is Magic" (The Police)? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFZ7-fgmQqk&feature=related

IMO, you're way too trusting of politicians. :(

Damn, now's not the time to kick back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #27
29. and what's your favorite song? "I'm an asshole"
:eyes:

forgive me for pointing out the clearly obvious. VP is NOT a part of the legislative branch. What Cheney did was not part of the Constitution but he went in there and manhandled republicans like Jim Jeffords to the point that Jeffords left the party.

Biden may go to the senate to help get Obama's legislation passed but I would hope to god he doesn't turn out to be a Cheney. I would love to have a VP that isn't a DICK, both figuratively and namewise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #29
31. No, I'm not attempting to convey a sense of hopelessness, but your "Politics of Disney"
thanks to the upcoming Obama administration are just a tad bit ... naive. :-)

We must guard against the all too often "useful idiots" mode that many within the Senate fall into when they wish to EMPOWER corporate interests over that of the Average American. The GOP led Senate "pulled out all the stops" to include Cheney sitting in on meetings.

WE NEED BIDEN to not be formally barred in order to even BEGIN to take back our democratic republic from the PLUTOCRACY that has hi-jacked our Congress.

Dammit, we have to always hold their feet to the fire. We have no chance with Republicans but even DEMOCRATIC LEADERS must be forced to do the right thing lest they covertly "give in" to corporate interests.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #31
36. Wow, nice assumptions - you provide that service for all DUers
I've been following politics long enough to know not to shove my head up my ass when making broadscale assumptions about other DUers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RB TexLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:03 AM
Response to Original message
9. Do you also think the republican leader decides who meets with the Democratic caucus?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flobee Donating Member (19 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
11. Good enough for repugs-good enough for dems too!
I say let the republican rule changes come back to bite em in the ass!
People need to get on the phone and Let reid know!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
12. So it should be. LBJ was barred from them as well when he was VP.
Good to see some rules coming back again in government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
meegbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:07 AM
Response to Original message
13. DUMP REID!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
15. What's the big deal? The Vice President has no business in a Senate meeting
However as a Democrat he may or may not have business at a Democrat's meeting. However The Democratic Caucus of the Senate is not a Meeting of Democrats with a focus on the Senate, its a meeting of the Senate with a focus on Democrats. So Biden, as of the moment of his resignation from the Senate, is out. No problem with that. We do have 3 branches of Government and Biden has must moved from one to the other. Just as you can't go back and sleep in a house you have sold, his days as part of the Senate and its meetings is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lyric Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #15
35. Exactly.
It's perfectly reasonable. Reid is simply making it clear that, just because the Republicans tried to fuzz the line between the Legislative and Executive branches, that doesn't mean that the Democrats intend to repeat that mistake. Unless and until there is a 50/50 tie that requires a VP vote to break it, the Vice-President has no business in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
16. Sarah said she'd rule the Senate if she was VP & make policy you betcha...
I agree he shouldn't be looking over everyones's shoulder but should be allowed to make some courtesy calls to promote the administrations adgenda/position. An uninformed VP is not an asset.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shifting_sands Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:27 AM
Response to Original message
17. oh please
Biden supports this action, this is the media trying to make something that isn't there. The Vice Presidents were never allowed to attend their party caucus, nor were President's until Cheney and every one was too afraid to tell him to get out or the Republicans didn't want to tell him to get out. This is an attempt to return the Vice President's office to a normal Constitutional position instead of Cheney "King of the Hill"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
18. Please explain how Reid is supposed to bar Cheney from the GOP caucus
That's a power I didn't know the majority leader had. Please enlighten us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
19. Reid has no control what the republican caucus does. And Biden was supportive of this
Wants to return the VP position back to the executive branch where it is suppose to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
20. Didn't LBJ go to the caucus when he was VP?
Edited on Tue Dec-09-08 09:37 AM by AngryAmish
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #20
26. I think he tried, but he was barred from attending
This isn't a big deal. I imagine that Biden and Reid discussed this announcement. He isn't barred now, just when he becomes VP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AngryAmish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. Oh, I agree it is not a big deal
More like senators protecting the senate. I just thought I read that in the master of the Senate book.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
24. Biden, Reid, and the Dem Senate are correct to bar Biden. Please, Please Dems - don't
follow the dirty, rotten policies of the Republicans.

Knowing that Cheney attended, it is easy to see how Snowe, Collins, and some others always ended up in lock step with R's.

Though I berated Landrieau, the Nelsons and others for voting with Republicans so many times and though I would hope for more Dem solidarity in the next admin and possibly some R support.

I can imagine how Cheney virtually gave them orders.

We have had rampaging disease in Congress under this administration.

It's time to revert to the our people's Constitution and throw out the Cheney - Federal Society version of the Constitution.

Stick with the design of the Founding Fathers for BALANCE OF POWERS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:06 AM
Response to Reply #24
30. Why do you think Jeffords left the party - it was from the treatment by Cheney.
Thanks for your great post!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. With their lack of FILIBUSTER, what makes you think that Reid may not have similar corporate
interests to that of Cheney?

I have no faith in REID, that's why I'm curious why he's in such a hurry to bar VP Biden.

Senator Reid (D-NV) needs to be ousted as Leader.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #32
37. I don't know, I'm just a dumb DUer - why don't you just tell me since I seem to not have a clue
Edited on Tue Dec-09-08 11:09 AM by LynneSin
then you can tell all the other DUers what they think and believe in since you're running for the official "I know everything and everyone else is just stupid" job here at DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
34. Setting up a wall between the Legislative and Eexecutive branches (again)? I LOVE THIS,
Thank you, Senator Reid and VP-elect Biden!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #34
39. Ok first, there is no wall. This wasn't something Reid was doing to Biden
Biden was in complete agreeance with this too. The VP is not the 'thug of the senate' - a role that Cheney took on during the early years of the Bush administration.

Biden is to provide a vote if there is a tiebreaker. Biden will also be there to help get Obama's agenda passed but not with a heavy hand like Cheney did. Remember, the reason why Jeffords left the republican party was because Cheney was putting the pressure on Jeffords to vote lockstep with the rest of the party.

And Biden does, in some ways, have a voice in the Democratic Caucus. They picked his former Chief-of-Staff Ted Kaufman to replace Biden in the senate. So in a way Biden will be there.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
38. You watch, Biden's gonna shoot him in the face with a quail gun
This is sooo procedural. I can understand Reid protecting his turf from the influence of the Executive Branch. I may like Biden more than Reid, but I certainly love the separation of powers more than any passing political affiliation I might hold.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
40. The only way to get congressional dems to stand up against "the man"...
... Is when "the man" is one of their own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC