Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chicago Parking Meters Privatized- Rates Will Quadruple

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Orwellian_Ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:23 AM
Original message
Chicago Parking Meters Privatized- Rates Will Quadruple
It's official: Chicago parking meters will be private, pricier
City Council approves deal 40-5

By Dan Mihalopoulos and Hal Dardick
December 5, 2008

City Hall could spend more than half of its $1.2 billion check within a few years, but a private company that agreed to pay that huge sum to lease Chicago's parking meters now will get to collect the cash for the next 75 years.

Although the 36,000 meters generate almost $20 million a year in net income—and rates are set to rise sharply next month—Mayor Richard Daley contends the city is better served in these tough economic times by taking the money upfront.

Under a deal approved Thursday by a 40-5 City Council vote, the cost to park at two-thirds of the meters in Chicago will quadruple next month. Neighborhood spots that cost a quarter an hour will cost $1 an hour and will increase to $2 an hour by 2013. The top meter rates in the Loop will go from $3 an hour to $6.50 within five years.

<snip>

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-parking-meter-05dec05,0,4162264.story


For City Hall, privatizing parking meters was all about money. The 75-year deal gives Chicago a $1.16 billion payment up front, generated largely by the private operator's ability to jack up parking prices. By 2013, the cost of parking at a meter in the Loop will more than double. The price at a meter in outlying neighborhoods will increase eight-fold.

The city expects to use $325 million of that windfall to cover budget deficits from 2009 until 2012, including $150 million for 2009. The city already plans to lay off 635 employees and cut back on major services; without this cash, the cuts could be worse.

Analysts frown on using one-time cash windfalls to cover operating expenses, and usually we would agree. But these are extraordinary times.

Our one major criticism of the city's parking meter privatization deal is that City Hall should have earmarked some of this money to the CTA, given that some drivers now will no doubt switch to public transportation.

The city might also have been wise to direct a portion of the funds to specific streets and business districts likely to be hardest hit by higher meter rates. Other municipalities that have raised parking rates, such as Redwood City, Calif., have funneled extra revenue to the affected business districts, to improve public services and amenities.

<snip>

http://www.suntimes.com/news/commentary/1317667,CST-EDT-edit07.article
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. Parking meters are another form of one-armed bandits and the House ALWAYS wins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalFighter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
2. Daley is a dumbass.
In my opinion it demonstrates Daley's incompetence is managing the finances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. Stupid, just stupid
Privatizing the commons is Fascist.


Well - I guess more people will be taking mass transit now. That's the silver lining....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftHander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. Profitized.....nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xloadiex Donating Member (118 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. Daley is selling off the city
and will not get one more vote from me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC