Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Coleman Camp Still Denying There Are Missing Ballots

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-09-08 10:34 AM
Original message
Coleman Camp Still Denying There Are Missing Ballots
http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/12/coleman_campaign_still_denying.php

Coleman Campaign Still Denying There Are Missing Ballots
By Eric Kleefeld - December 9, 2008, 9:35AM



The never-ending Minnesota recount has taken a turn into the truly surreal: The Coleman campaign is still denying that those 133 missing ballots exist at all, even though city officials have pinpointed the exact envelope the ballots were in!

"The decision by a senior member of the secretary of state's office, as well as the secretary of state himself, to insist there are missing ballots when there are any number of other plausible scenarios is disappointing," Coleman spokesman Luke Friedrich told the Star Tribune, adding that officials should not be "just accepting the political spin of the Franken campaign."

Actually, we do know that the ballots exist -- Minneapolis officials have explained that this precinct placed their votes in envelopes numbered "1 of 5," "2 of 5," etc., but the "1" envelope is gone and the city officials have given up on finding it after an exhaustive search. The rub here is that if the loss of the envelope is not somehow compensated for in this deep-blue precinct, Al Franken would lose a net 46 votes -- quite possibly enough to flip the result to Coleman.

This latest legal mess is only just beginning. As we reported on Friday, the state has the option of defaulting bak to the Election Night count for this particular precinct, effectively undoing the loss. The Coleman campaign seems to be gearing up to oppose such a move, and the state should probably be preparing for a lawsuit over this issue no matter which call they mak
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC