Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Some (NATO) Convoys May Be Paying Off Taliban

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 08:38 AM
Original message
Some (NATO) Convoys May Be Paying Off Taliban
Source: Military.com

More than 300 supply-laden vehicles winding their way from Pakistan to U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan were destroyed in Taliban attacks just this month.

But not every convoy is being attacked, and a report by The Times of London claims that's because the Taliban has cut itself in for a piece of the action.

The Times is reporting that the multinational companies with the coalition contracts are subcontracting the work to local trucking companies which, in turn, hire Afghan security companies as escorts.

A number of these companies have begun paying Taliban forces for protection, according to the report. That meaning that millions of dollars is ending up in the hands of the Taliban, who are using it to fund their own operations against U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan.

“We estimate that approximately 25 per cent of the money we pay for security to get the fuel in goes into the pockets of the Taliban,” one fuel importer is quoted by the Times as saying.

The paper said the payments were confirmed by several fuel importers, trucking and security company owners, though none agreed to be named because of risk to their own companies and lives, it said.

more: http://www.military.com/news/article/some-convoys-may-be-paying-off-taliban.html?col=1186032310810
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Works for heroin, cocaine and other illegal imports too.
Helluva business plan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 08:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. I swear you can't make this shit up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Funding both sides of an unwunnable war.
Amazing, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. "What's amazing is that I'm THE DECIDER. Smirk." - Commander AWOL (R)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 08:56 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Criminal is more like it
and yes it is amazing. Yesterday I heard a goood man on my television telling me is so many words, to hang in there he was working on it. I just love him too. Soon to be President Obama that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 09:05 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. That is one thing I can't get my mind around.
I know that Obama has been speaking with South Asian experts for 2 years or more. He must understand what happens to occupiers and military actions there. Adding 2 or 3 brigades will add nothing more than more targets. I just don't get how he can think heading down this same road is going to do anyone any good.

Unless he has some 'super secret' plan to produce a bin Laden body and get the hell out, it is doomed to fail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 09:15 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Any war such as what we're doing there is doomed to failure
Killing people is never right. War is the exact opposite of what is needed to deal with terrorism.

We won't have troops over there much longer. I trust him on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. Hmmm ...isn't it a federal crime to fund any terrorist organization?
In that case I am a criminal because I pay taxes to a terrorist government and country ....the USA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
9. Ok, I don't pretend to be a military genius but
Edited on Fri Dec-12-08 09:21 AM by shadowknows69
When you have to bribe your enemy to allow you to get the supplies through to keep fighting them, haven't you pretty much been handed your ass at that point. I don't know which is weirder that we're bribing them or that they're taking it instead of just continuing to blow our shit up? When exactly did we enter the Twilight Zone (TM) again do you figure? Reagan?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. The Taliban makes some serious money letting some of them through.
That is why they don't blow them all up. They know they can outlast us, so letting some through and making millions on escorting them is a win/win for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. I know the logic behind it, but I have to write it so I can actually read it and believe it
And I still don't believe we're going to throw more gas and wood on this conflagration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC