Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

More comes to light: Bush hiring done by inexperienced kids with connections -- and 'tude

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 12:33 PM
Original message
More comes to light: Bush hiring done by inexperienced kids with connections -- and 'tude
NYT op-ed: Generation No
By THOMAS A. SCHWEICH
Published: December 11, 2008

St. Louis

“You know you have arrived when you get interviewed by the 29-year-old instead of the 22-year-old,” the 57-year-old foreign service officer said to me with a laugh. It was late 2005, and this three-time ambassador had just been interviewed for a top post at the Department of State. Her interviewer was part of a large corps of 20-somethings — some were in their early 30s — who ran the Office of Presidential Personnel. Many of them were sons or daughters of supporters of President George W. Bush. Others had connections through congressmen. With few exceptions, they had one thing in common: very little experience and a very big attitude.

Another top foreign service officer called me after his interview to be ambassador to a volatile African country. “The problem was,” he told me, “the kid interviewing me could not pronounce the name of the country I was being interviewed for. It made for an awkward interview until he just started saying ‘the country we are considering you for.’”...

My own experience is typical. I had three jobs in the Bush administration: ambassador for counternarcotics and justice reform in Afghanistan, deputy assistant secretary of state for international law enforcement affairs and chief of staff of the United States mission to the United Nations. For two of these jobs, my appointment was preceded by an effort by a 20-something in personnel to place an unqualified friend in the job....

In the worst cases, the “kids” — as many of us called them — would search for a candidate and eventually conclude, like Dick Cheney when he was the head of George W. Bush’s vice presidential search team, that they were the best candidates for the jobs.

The problems that resulted occasionally made the news. There was small bit of outrage in 2005 when a 30-something personnel employee picked herself to head the new Immigration and Customs Enforcement division of the Department of Homeland Security. (Her tenure included the publication of a photograph online of her standing next to an employee, who was costumed in blackface and a prisoner’s uniform, during a Halloween party that she hosted.) Similarly, the inexperience of Monica Goodling, the former liaison to the White House at the Justice Department, contributed to the politics-based hiring of career lawyers and helped create a demoralizing scandal from which the department still has not fully recovered.

But there were many other such stories that stayed below the radar screen....

(Thomas A. Schweich teaches law at Washington University in St. Louis.)

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/12/opinion/12schweich.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dangerously Amused Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. I am shocked, shocked I tell you,


...to learn that there were 20 year old kids running the country for the last eight years. But that would certainly explain the current state of affairs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leftist Agitator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 04:06 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. "...that would certainly explain the current state of affairs"
Edited on Sat Dec-13-08 04:13 AM by skypuddle
You know what? Screw you!

We 20-somethings aren't all a bunch of incompetant, dangerously stupid, totally unqualified assholes...That's just the Republican ones!

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dangerously Amused Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 04:17 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. You know what?


Fuck you back. That's why I specified the ones "running the country for the last eight years." Those would be REPUBLICANS.

You know what else? Even the brightest twenty-somethings aren't qualified (don't have the job/life experience) to run the country, politics notwithstanding.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leftist Agitator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 04:26 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Joe Biden disagrees.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
2. Now we know how "heck of a job brownie" got his job. Disgraceful. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
3. On the plus side, many of the outside jobs these kids are also unqualified to do...
have been destroyed in the blowback from the maladministration... not to mention, they're all going to put "worked for the * administration" on their resumes. Yeah, that should work out well for them. Republic business owners in the private sector are all about the entitlements and will, no doubt, be handing out $150K+ jobs to former Bushies like candy on Halloween.

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. I went to college with one of them.
Our alum rag did a story a few years back about how he was high up in the DHS. *shudder* Sure, he's bright, no doubt, but the idea of him being that high up and controlling DHS made me feel a bit squicked out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
young_at_heart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. And yet, 22% of Americans still support Bush's policies???
I guess there will always be a "base", but this story is beyond the pale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
arcadian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. Reminds me of the scene in "The Killing Fields"
After the Kymer Rouge took over and put children in charge of reeducation camps. Very similar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ColbertWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 04:18 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. HMM. Good point. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. And now Obama's team must ferret out all these hires and fast! rec'd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-13-08 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
12. Oh hell
Another one of those end-of-term news dumps from the Times, when it's too late to do anything about it. Everybody's trying to buttress their "credibility" by kicking Bush as he goes out the door.

No mention of how the Iraq CPA was stuffed with zero-experience ideologue pups, holding the power of disbursement over billions of dollars in a war-flattened country. And remember the punk given charge of NASA's web servers, who got shuffled to another job after he decreed all references to evolution be deleted from their websites? This shit has been SOP for Bushco since day one.

And of course, these revelations are just prologue for the real thrust of the story -- giving Obama notice that he'd better not think he can away with doing the same:
In fairness to the Bush administration, for which I retain a great deal of admiration, putting young campaign workers and connected college graduates into White House personnel positions is nothing new. And some of them, like Stuart Holliday and Dina Powell, who ran President Bush’s personnel office for a while, were true professionals.

But if our new president wants to make an important change to how government works, he should fill the personnel office — and the liaison offices to the White House at the various executive branch departments — with a combination of veteran government employees and human resources experts. That’s the way to ensure that the best people get the jobs that will shape our country for the next four years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 03:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC