Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New American Troops Going to Kabul, to Prevent it From Falling to Taliban

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 02:34 PM
Original message
New American Troops Going to Kabul, to Prevent it From Falling to Taliban
Source: ToledoBlade.com

(snip)

It remains the case that the United States has a commitment there. It is also likely that if the Taliban, which controls as much as 75 percent of the country, come back into power, Afghanistan will become once again the host of al-Qaeda and other terrorist elements. Lashkar-e-Taiba in Pakistan, for example, may come looking for a new home if the Pakistanis are smart.

At the same time, there are a number of important developments in Afghanistan that could change Obama administration calculations in terms of planning, if they are taken into account. For example, Afghan President Hamid Karzai is now sufficiently sure of himself to tell the United States and NATO that after seven years of war in his country, it is time for them either to complete it or leave.

The role of United States and other foreign forces in Afghanistan is also different from what it was in 2001, when Americans fought alongside Northern Alliance Afghans to chase the Taliban and al-Qaeda out and try to catch Osama bin Laden and Taliban leader Mullah Omar. Both remain at large.

Now the new American troops slated to be introduced to Afghanistan will be placed in Kabul, the capital, to try to prevent it from falling to the Taliban. Mr. Karzai's idea is that if the foreign forces were gone, he would be in a better position to cut a deal with the Taliban, perhaps saving his skin in the process.

Put another way, it is likely that he and other far-sighted Afghans see the United States and NATO presence in Afghanistan to have an expiration date and believe that they will depart the country eventually, as did the British, the Soviet Union, and Alexander the Great.

A realistic look at the situation in Afghanistan leaves Mr. Obama a tough row to hoe. After his campaign promise he cannot simply have the United States walk away from Afghanistan after the inauguration. Yet it is unlikely that he can imagine a much heavier U.S. troop commitment than exists now.

A phased departure negotiated with Mr. Karzai is probably the best bet, with the Afghan president in a strong enough position now not to let the Taliban rule the roost after the United States leaves. America can retain the option of wreaking serious destruction from the air if things go too wrong after its ground troops depart.

http://toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20081212/OPINION02/812120336
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. Vietnam, Take two: n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Unfortunately.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-12-08 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. terrible
75% of Afghanistan is at the hand of Taliban, another bushie fuckup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC