Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

President-Elect Obama's Animal Welfare Team - HSUS

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Annces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 03:03 PM
Original message
President-Elect Obama's Animal Welfare Team - HSUS
by Michael Markarian


1) Former Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack, the next Secretary of Agriculture


Tom Vilsack has a solid record on animal protection, and he was the top choice of HSUS and HSLF to lead the USDA, the agency that oversees our federal laws on animal welfare, humane slaughter and transport, horse protection, animal fighting, and others.

As governor of Iowa, Vilsack advocated for bills to toughen the state’s penalties for animal fighting, and now he will lead the agency charged with enforcing the federal law to break up dogfighting and cockfighting rings. He stood up to the puppy mill industry and vetoed a bill in 2006 that would have weakened protections for pets by reclassifying dogs as "farm products." He also exhibited tremendous fortitude and adherence to principle when he vetoed legislation in 2001 that would have allowed the sport hunting of mourning doves for the first time in decades.



2) U.S. Sen. Ken Salazar of Colorado, the next Secretary of the Interior


Ken Salazar was a surprise choice for Interior, and wasn’t one of the names pushed by animal advocates. His record on animal issues in the U.S. Senate has been mixed, scoring 0 on the Humane Scorecard for the 109th Congress, and 50 percent in the 110th Congress. He voted against legislation to ban horse slaughter in 2005, but in the current session he co-sponsored legislation to strengthen the penalties for animal fighting and signed onto a letter requesting increased funds for the adequate enforcement of animal welfare laws. He has received relatively high marks on environmental issues from the League of Conservation Voters, scoring 78 percent in the 109th Congress and 85 percent in the 110th Congress. But, again, as with animal advocates, Salazar was not on the list of preferred candidates for the environmental community. The President-elect passed over more strongly recommended candidates such as Reps. Raúl Grijalva and Jay Inslee.

As Interior chief, Salazar will oversee the enforcement of wildlife protection laws such as the Endangered Species Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and will have authority for wildlife management practices on millions of acres of federal lands in national parks, national wildlife refuges, and Bureau of Land Management properties. We look forward to working with him, too, and addressing the major wildlife policy issues such as protecting threatened polar bears and other species from the impacts of global warming, deploying immunocontraceptive technology to manage wild horses and burros humanely on the range, and addressing the animal welfare and public safety risks of the exotic pet trade.


3) Lisa Jackson, will head the Environmental Protection Agency.



Lisa Jackson led the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, and was a leading animal advocate in the state. She rejected attempts by the NRA, Safari Club, and other trophy hunting groups to initiate a hunting season on New Jersey’s small population of black bears, and she instead implemented a comprehensive program to solve bear conflicts with humane methods such as trash management and public education. We are pleased to have such an innovative leader at the helm of EPA, and we hope to work with her on continued efforts to prioritize the use of alternatives to animals in toxicity testing, to ensure strong penalties for pollution from factory farms and dismantle the Bush Administration’s corporate giveaway that exempts them from having to report their massive toxic emissions.


full article

http://hslf.typepad.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 03:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. Screw the enema activists.
We need people to protect the environment, not push fantasy rights for animals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
El Supremo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
2. Fuck HSUS.
They are in bed with PETA. They are animal rights advocates not animal welfare advocates. They want us to stop eating meat and stop ownership of animals.

i could care less what they have to say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 03:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Your attitude belongs with the Neanderthals

Wow. No compassion at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yep - those first two are not people who should be allowed anywhere near an animal.
They probably think the main function of the Dept of Interior is to make sure there are enough wild animals stocked in national forests for them to hunt and kill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bain_sidhe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-18-08 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. It's not about compassion
Edited on Thu Dec-18-08 05:25 PM by bain_sidhe
el Supremo is right:

Better Dead than Fed, PETA says:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/06/23/EDG11DC9BK1.DTL

A call for the director to resign, with more details.
http://www.nokillnow.com/PETAIngridNewkirkResign.htm

A blog post about PETA's "philosophy" - it's kinder to kill homeless animals than to adopt them out.
http://dogpolitics.typepad.com/my_weblog/2007/01/peta_is_dead_me.html

A quote from that post:

But all of this should come as no surprise, as one dedicated dog-loving reader put it - PETA's agenda - along with other so-called "animal protection" organizations - is the elimination of animals as pets altogether.

In their view - simply even owning a dog or a cat or a bunny is cruel.

The end-game for PETA is total animal liberation, including animal ownership. So while PETA and their pals go begging for money from al those pet owners to end "animal cruelty" - just keep in mind that PETA's vision of animal cruelty includes - pet ownership.



HSUS is on board with this, one of PETA's biggest supporters, in fact.

**edited for typo**
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 09:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC