Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Analysis: Census data shows 8 states could lose House seats

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
MazeRat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 01:01 PM
Original message
Analysis: Census data shows 8 states could lose House seats
Eight states — most in the Northeast and Midwest — would lose seats in Congress in 2010, based on an analysis of Census estimates of 2008 state populations released today.

Iowa, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania each would lose a seat, according to an analysis by Election Data Services, Inc.

Five states — Arizona, Florida, Georgia, Nevada, and Utah — would each gain one seat. Texas would be the big winner, adding three seats.
http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/census/2008-12-22-census-congress-analysis_N.htm


Why are we seeing this population shift ? Personally I suspect, as with all systems, there are many factors at work. Bottom line, having seen how the districts were gerrymandered here in Texas to favor republicans, I suspect we will see more in these other states as well.

Peace,
MZr7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. people are moving to the south for WORK
It's not gerrymandering -- it's economic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. Have you ever tried living in Massachusetts?
It's cold up there, man! In addition, most places are heated with oil, so keeping the pipes unfrozen is an extremely expensive proposition.

A lot of snowbirds who moved south permanently are finding the AC bills are worse, but at least they don't have to shovel heat.

Just realize that the people who are leaving are largely Democrats, so the population shift is also going to be a cultural shift in the states that see net population gains.

It's why NC went barely blue this time.

Gerrymandering will be able to do only so much, diluting urban populations with stuck in the mud, conservative rural ones. While local elections will remain putrid, national ones are likely to shift in states with net population gain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellstone dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. I was counting on losing Minnesota's sixth district
I want to lose Michelle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
4. Pa, Oh, & Mi losses are due to lack of available jobs. La due to
many people simply not returning after Katrina. I don't know about the North Eastern States, but I would guess it has at least something to do with many people retiring and moving south.

I know Pa. lost 1 seat in the last census too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elifino Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. Looks like job availability, companies moving to low tax states.
I read this somewhere sometime ago, sorry do not remember the source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-22-08 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. Seems like lots of people have been moving here
these last 25, 30 years or so but we lost one the last time best I remember. Oklahoma

Maybe the smart ones figured if we can send two dickheads like inhofe and coburn to the senate we don't need the representation so they cut our number by one. My apologies to everyone for my states foisting these two upon you all.

Actually I think its our optical scan vote counting and the extremely high cost of recounts to be at work here :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC