Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

if at all possible don't give birth to your baby in the city of L.A.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 11:53 AM
Original message
if at all possible don't give birth to your baby in the city of L.A.


http://counterpunch.com/stclair12262008.html


Born Under a Bad Sky
Cancerous Air


This is what it has come to: the air in LA is so toxic that a child born in the city of angels will inhale more cancer-causing pollutants in the first two weeks of life than the EPA (not known for understating risks) considers safe for a lifetime.

This risk never goes away. It comes with the first breaths a child takes. Being born in urban California now means that life expectancy is reduced, chances of getting cancer are elevated. All this before you’ve inflicted any damage on yourself through smoking, drinking booze, eating fast food, or watching CNN.

-snip-

In Los Angeles the air is so clotted with ten cancer-causing chemicals that residents there face a cancer risk 1,005 times the level considered “safe” by the EPA. And the most vulnerable to those risks are children, especially poor and working-class children.

-snip-

This has to do with the physiology of children. They inhale more air than adults relative to their body weight. Thus, they are exposed to higher concentrations of cancer-causing chemicals.

-snip-

For example, in San Francisco the average infant will exceed the EPA’s lifetime exposure to toxic air pollutants in 19 days. In LA, it takes only twelve days. By the time the average LA-born girl reaches her eighteenth birthday, she will have breathed enough toxic air to place her 344 times over what the EPA considers an acceptable lifetime exposure to these contaminants.

“The potential risk that a child rapidly accumulates in California for simply breathing will not go away when the child is older, even if the air is cleaner when the child reaches adulthood,” the report warns. “Remarkably, if the carcinogens in California air were cleaned up to EPA’s level immediately, a child born in California would still exceed the lifetime acceptable cancer risk by age four and an adult moving to California would exceed it in seven years.”
-snip-
-----------------------------------

that infant's 1st breath starting its life is most important!

where you give birth matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Alexander Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Don't do it in Phoenix, either. The pollution is almost as bad.
It practically never rains here, so the smog just collects in the valley.

The slight improvement in air quality is offset by a pathetic public education system (among the worst in the country - and it shows), the lack of culture, high rates of crime, meth abuse, car theft and nothing in the way of good jobs. So if your kid doesn't get asthma here, he or she will not get a good education or find any decent work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lies and propaganda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. lack of culture.. no doubt
I lived in Phoenix for the last 8 years trying to make a living as an artist. hahahhahah. Moved to NorCal and in a year have tripled what I have made in one in the desert. Come on out if you need a break ;0
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. Endorsed, and please expand that to the entire state of California
We have too many people here already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-27-08 12:33 PM
Response to Original message
3. I always thought smog was the culprit
In many cities the air near the measuring stations is worse than indoor air in a bar. You have to hunt to get the numbers in order to compare them, but they're out there. One of these days they'll discover chaff from various crops is worse than cigarette smoke too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC